Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:56:52.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Egnatius the Epicurean: The Banalization of Philosophy in Catullus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2022

James Uden Open the ORCID record for James Uden [Opens in a new window]
James Uden*
Affiliation:
Boston University Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article offers a new examination of the place of philosophy in Catullus’ Carmina. It focuses on Egnatius, the ‘smiling Spaniard’ of poems 37 and 39, and argues that Catullus’ attacks on this character make use of many standard invective tropes against Epicureans in the late Republic. More than merely an opportunity to show off his whitened teeth, Egnatius’ smile may well have been proof of his philosophical detachment and ataraxia. Yet Catullus maliciously misrepresents this mark of Epicurean virtue as a social gaffe, and an unflattering reminder of Egnatius’ provincial origins. I then reinterpret poems 37, 38, and 39 as a poetic series unified by the ‘banalization’ of philosophical ideas. Ultimately, Catullus creates his own singular voice – the arbiter of style and taste – by representing aspects of other people's behaviour as trite and ordinary. To banalize is an act of power, and it is a weapon that Catullus wields to articulate a sense of difference from other poets and thinkers in his intellectual world.

Keywords

CatullusEgnatiusEpicureanismRoman philosophyinvectivebanality in literature
Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 55 , 2021 , pp. 94 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Australasian Society for Classical Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrighetti, G. (1960), Epicuro: Opere. Turin.Google Scholar
Baehrens, E. (1885), Catulli Veronensis Liber, Vol. 2. Lepizig.Google Scholar
Baker, S. (1960), ‘Catullus 38’, CPh 55, 37–68.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2014), Laughter in Ancient Rome: on Joking, Tickling, and Cracking Up. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bishop, J. D. (1971), ‘Catullus 85: Structure, Hellenistic Parallels, and the Topos’, Latomus 30, 633–42.Google Scholar
Booth, A. (1985), ‘Une de Capillatis … Egnati’, Echos du monde classique 29, 111–20.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (trans. Nice, R.). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Burkard, T. (2006), ‘Zu Catulls 38. Gedicht. Ein Interpretationsvorschlag’, Hermes 134, 181–94.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. (2008), ‘Sigmatic Ecthlipsis in Lucretius’, Hermes 136, 188–205.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. (2004), ‘Unbearding Morality: Appearance and Persuasion in Pro Caelio’, CJ 100, 61–72.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (2009), ‘The Athenian Garden’, in Warren, J. (ed) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge, 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (2013), The Fragments of the Roman Historians. Vol 1: Introduction, Oxford.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1993), The Fragmentary Latin Poets, Oxford.Google Scholar
Curchin, L. A. (2004), The Romanization of Central Spain: Complexity, Diversity and Change in a Provincial Hinterland. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWitt, N. W. (1936), ‘Epicurean Contubernium’, TAPhA 67, 55–63.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1993), The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1889), A Commentary on Catullus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2009), ‘Catullus and the Roman Paradox Epigram’, MD 61, 29–39.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1984), ‘Lucretius’ Cure for Love in the De Rerum Natura’, CW 78, 73–86.Google Scholar
Fordyce, C. J. (ed.) (1961), Catullus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gale, M. (1994), Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. (1976), ‘Commedia e filosofia in età ellenistica: Batone’, Vichiana 5, 206–42.Google Scholar
Giesecke, A. L. (2000), Atoms, Ataraxy, and Allusion: Cross-Generic Imitation of the De Rerum Natura in Early Augustan Poetry. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2015), ‘Among Friends: Cicero and the Epicureans’, PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Godwin, J. (1999), Catullus: The Shorter Poems. Warminster.Google Scholar
Godwin, J. (2018), ‘The Ironic Epicurean in Poems 23, 114, 115’, Paideia 73, 837–51.Google Scholar
Goetz, G. (1885), ‘Glossographische Kleinigkeiten’, RhM 40, 324–8.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (2012), The Invention and Gendering of Epicurus. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. (1993), The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Granarolo, J. (1967), L’œuvre de Catulle: Aspects religieux, éthiques et stylistiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1995), ‘Philosophical Badinage in Cicero's Letters to his Friends’, in Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher. Oxford, 325–46.Google Scholar
Grosse, R. (1959), Fontes Hispaniae antiquae, Vol. 8. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (2007). Fragments of Roman Poetry: c. 60 BC – AD 20. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2001), ‘The Date of De Rerum Natura’, CQ 51, 150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1999), ‘Catullus, C. 37 and the Theme of Magna Bella’, Helios 26, 85–96.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1985), ‘Democritus and the Origins of Moral Psychology’, AJPh 106, 1–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Kazantzidis, G. (2021), Lucretius on Disease: The Poetics of Morbidity in De Rerum Natura. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. T. (2000), ‘Egnatius’ Dentral Fricatives (Catullus 39.20)’, CPh 95, 338–48.Google Scholar
Konstan, D., Clay, D., Glad, C. E., Thom, J. C., and Ware, J. (1998), Philodemus: On Frank Criticism. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Kowerski, L. M. (2008), ‘Sadder than Simonidean Tears: Cornificius and Simonides in Catullus 38’, CW 101, 139–57.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, L. (2014), ‘The Rise of Sabinus: Sexual Satire in Catalepton 10’, CJ 110, 191–212.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2001), ‘Arbitria Vrbanitatis: Language, Style, and Characterization in Catullus cc. 39 and 37’, ClAnt 20, 239–72.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (2018), ‘Gender, Geography, and Genre: Catullus’ Constructions of Lesbia in Space and Time’, in Fitzgerald, W. and Spentzou, E. (eds.), The Production of Space in Latin Literature. Oxford, 119–46.Google Scholar
MacLaren, M. (1961), ‘Tennyson's Epicurean Lotos-Eaters’, CJ 56, 259–67.Google Scholar
Majumdar, S. (2013), Prose of the World: Modernism and the Banality of Empire. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcovich, M. (1982), ‘Catullus 13 and Philodemus 23’, QUCC 40, 131–8.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. (2015), Review of Beard (2014), BMCR 2015.10.22.Google Scholar
Nappa, C. (2001), Aspects of Catullus’ Social Fiction. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Németh, B. (1998), ‘Risus ineptus (Cat. 37 bzw 39): ein Diptychon’, AAntHung. 38, 215–21.Google Scholar
Neudling, C. N. (1955), A Prosopography to Catullus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nikolaev, A. (2015), ‘The Origin of Latin prōsāpia’, Glotta 91, 226–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Rudd, N. (2004), A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book III, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994), The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, Princeton.Google Scholar
O'Bryhim, S. (2018), ‘Egnatius as Dux Gregis (Catullus 37 and 39)’, CPh 113, 352–60.Google Scholar
O'Hearn, L. (2021), ‘Being Beatus in Catullus’ Poems 9, 10, 22 and 23’, CQ 70, 691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, S. D. (2007), Broken Laughter: Select Fragments of Greek Comedy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, H. (2015), The Oxford Latin Syntax. Vol. 1: The Simple Clause. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polt, C. B. (2021), Catullus and Roman Comedy: Theatricality and Personal Drama in the Late Republic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postgate, J. P. (1889), Gai Valeri Catulli Carmina. London.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1978), ‘The Identity Problems of Q. Cornificius’, CQ 28, 188–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, E. (1985), Intellectual Life in the Late Republic. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Ricks, C. (ed.) (1969), The Poems of Tennyson. London & Harlow.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2006), Dining Posture in Ancient Rome: Bodies, Values, and Status. Princeton.Google Scholar
Sallmann, K. (1962), ‘Studien zum philosophischen Naturbegriff der Römer mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Lukrez’, ABG 7, 140–284.Google Scholar
Schafer, J. K. (2020), Catullus through his Books: Dramas of Composition. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2009), ‘Republican Virtues’, in Balot, R. K. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Chichester, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scourfield, J. H. D. (2013), ‘Towards a Genre of Consolation’, in Baltussen, H. (ed.), Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and its Afterlife. Swansea, 1–36.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1989), ‘Philosophical Allegiance in the Greco-Roman World’, in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.) Philosophia togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford, 97–119.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1990), Lucretius on Death and Anxiety: Poetry and Philosophy in de Rerum Natura. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seider, A. M. (2016), ‘Catullan Myths: Gender, Mourning, and the Death of a Brother’, ClAnt 35, 279–314.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. O. (2014), ‘Socration or Philodemus? Catullus 47 and Prosopographical Excess’, CJ 109, 385–405.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (1997), The Epigrams of Philodemus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. (2003), Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65–116. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. (2007), ‘Authorial Arrangement of the Collection: Debate Past and Present’, in Skinner, M. B. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. F. (1993), Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription. Naples.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1937), ‘Who was Decidius Saxa?’, JRS 27, 127–37.Google Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. (ed.) (1984), Catull: eine Interpretation. Erster Teil: die kleinen Gedichte (1–60). Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Támas, Á. (2016), ‘Erroneous Gazes: Lucretian Poetics in Catullus 64’, JRS 106, 1–20.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (ed.) (1997), Catullus. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uden, J. (2006), ‘Embracing the Young Man in Love: Catullus 75 and the Comic Adulescens’, Antichthon 40, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, K. (forthcoming), ‘Philosophy’, in Gibson, R. K. and Whitton, C. L. (eds.), The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Watson, L. (2009), ‘Catullus and the Brothel-Creepers: Carmen 37’, Antichthon 43, 123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, L. (2012), ‘Catullus, Inurbanitas and the Transpadenes’, in Morelli, A. M. (ed.), Lepos e mores: Una giornata su Catullo. Cassino, 151–69.Google Scholar
Williams, C. A. (2010), Roman Homosexuality, 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1985), Catullus and his World: A Reappraisal. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wray, D. (2001), Catullus and the Poetics of Roman Manhood. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yona, S. (2018), Epicurean Ethics in Horace: The Psychology of Satire. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanker, P. (1996), The Mask of Socrates: The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2016), ‘Philosophy is in the Streets’, in Williams, G. D. and Volk, K. (eds.), Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford, 50–62.Google Scholar