Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T05:18:14.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Thoughts about the Fasti of James George Frazer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

Emma Gee
Emma Gee*
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The abridged version of The Golden Bough has in the 1990s alone been reissued in several paperback editions. This would have pleased its author, with his penchant for successive editions and modifications of his own works. Sir James Frazer is still being read, at least in epitome, despite the fact that his anthropological work is apparently considered something of a dinosaur. At the same time, bemused Classics undergraduates are still getting their first contact with Ovid’s Fasti through Frazer’s Loeb translation of 1931, and doing battle with his 1929 commentary as the only one available in English on Ovid’s calendar-poem in its entirety.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 32 , November 1998 , pp. 64 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, R., Frazer, J.G., His Life and Work (Cambridge 1987).Google Scholar
Ackerman, R., ‘Sir James G. Frazer and A.E. Housman: a Relationship in Letters’, GRBS 15 (1974)339–364.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (ed.), P. Ovidi Nasonis Fastorum Liber III, with introduction and commentary (Oxford 1921).Google Scholar
Bailey, C., ‘Ovid’s Fasti’ (Review of Frazer’s 1929 ed.), CR 44 (1930)235–240.Google Scholar
Beard, M., ‘Frazer, Leach and Virgil: The Popularity (and Unpopularity) of The Golden Bough’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 34 (1992) 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, A.B., ‘The Golden Bough and the Rex Nemorensis’, CR n.s. 16 (1902) 365–380.Google Scholar
Delz, J., ‘Kritische Bemerkungen zu Tibull, Ovid und Martial’, Mus. Helv. 28 (1971) 49–59.Google Scholar
Downie, R. A., James George Frazer (London 1940).Google Scholar
Fowler, W. Warde, The Roman Festivals of the Period of the Republic (London 1899).Google Scholar
Fowler, W. Warde, The Religious Experience of the Roman People, from the Earliest Times to the Age of Augustus (London 1911).Google Scholar
Fraser, R. (ed.), Sir James Frazer and the Literary imagination (London 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, R., The Making of The Golden Bough (London 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, J.G., Lectures on the Early History of the Kingship (London 1905).Google Scholar
Frazer, J.G., The Golden Bough, 3rd ed., 12 Volumes (London1911–1915).Google Scholar
Frazer, J.G., The Golden Bough, abridged ed. (London 1922).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, J.G. (ed.), Pubiii Ovidii Nasonis, Fastorum Libri Sex, with translation and commentary, 5 volumes (London 1929).Google Scholar
Frazer, J.G., (ed.), Ovid: Fasti (Harvard and London 1931); 2nd ed. 1989, revised by Goold, G.P..Google Scholar
Marett, R. (ed.), Anthropology and the Classics (Oxford 1908).Google Scholar
Merkel, R. (ed.), P. Ovidii Nasonis Fastorum Libri Sex (Berlin 1841).Google Scholar
Phillips, C.R., ‘Roman Religion and Literary Studies of Ovid’s Fasti’, Arethusa 25 (1992)55–80.Google Scholar
Rose, H.J., Obituary of Sir James George Frazer, in CR 55 (1941)57–59.Google Scholar
Rose, H.J., ‘Publii Ovidii Nasonis Fastorum Libri Sex: The Fasti of Ovid’ (Review of Frazer’s 1929 ed.), JRS 19 (1929) 235–239.Google Scholar
Scullard, H.H., Festivals and Ceremonies of the Roman Republic (London 1981).Google Scholar
Smith, J.Z., Map is not Territory: Studies in the History of Religions [Studies in Judaism in Late Antiquity 23] (Leiden 1978).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tylor, E.B., ‘On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions, Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent’, Journal of the Anthropological Institute 18 (1889) 245–274.Google Scholar
Tylor, E.B., Primitive Culture (London 1871).Google Scholar