Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:09:34.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rome, Carthage, and Numidia: Diplomatic Favouritism before the Third Punic War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2018

Colin Bailey
Colin Bailey*
Affiliation:
MacEwan [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines Rome’s diplomatic relations with Carthage and Numidia in the period between the Second and Third Punic Wars. Polybius’ suggestion that Rome consistently decided against Carthage in territorial disputes with Numidia in the aftermath of the Second Punic War (Polyb. 31.21.5-6) has often been taken up in explanations of the origins of the Third Punic War. Many ancient and modern accounts accept the implication of a policy of hostility against Carthage, assuming that Rome permitted and even encouraged Masinissa to infringe upon and seize Carthaginian territory. This paper, however, argues that the results of Roman arbitration between Carthage and Numidia do not show a consistent policy intended to undermine Carthage. Rather, Rome sought to maintain the territorial division which was imposed at the end of the Second Punic War throughout the inter-war period; several of its decisions were actually in favour of Carthage. The Third Punic War should not be seen as a culmination of a half-century of Roman hostility towards Carthage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 52 , 2018 , pp. 43 - 71
Copyright
© The Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to express my thanks to the reviewers at Antichthon for their suggestions and comments on this article as well as to Dr. T. Deline for comments on earlier drafts. Any remaining mistakes are, of course, my own.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Astin, A. E. (1978), Cato the Censor. London.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1958), Foreign Clientelae (264-70 b.c.) . London.Google Scholar
Bagnall, N. (1990), The Punic Wars. London.Google Scholar
Baronowski, D. W. (1995), ‘Polybius on the Causes of the Third Punic War’, CPh 90, 16-31.Google Scholar
Baronowski, D. W. (2011), Polybius and Roman Imperialism. London.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K. (2007), A History of the Roman Republic. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Burton, P. J. (2011), Friendship and Empire: Roman Diplomacy and Imperialism in the Middle Republic (353-146 bc). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Caven, B. (1980), The Punic Wars. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M. (2006), Mediterranean Anarchy, Interstate War, and the Rise of Rome. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M. (2008), Rome Enters the Greek East: From Anarchy to Hierarchy in the Hellenistic Mediterranean, 230-170 bc . Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, A. (2000), The Fall of Carthage. London.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1976), ‘Rome and the Seleucids in the Aftermath of Pydna’, Chiron 6, 73-95.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1984), The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1979), War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327-370 bc . Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoyos, D. (2015a), Mastering the West: Rome and Carthage at War. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoyos, D. (2015b), ‘Carthage after 201 b.c.: African Prosperity and Roman Protection’, Classicum 41, 25-32.Google Scholar
Kahrstedt, U. (1913), Geschichte der Karthager von 218-146, vol. 3. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kunze, C. (2011), ‘Carthage and Numidia, 201-149 bc, in D. Hoyos (ed.), A Companion to the Punic Wars. 395-411. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Kadra-Hadjadji, H. (2013), Massinissa le Grand Africain. Paris.Google Scholar
Lazenby, J. F. (1998), Hannibal’s War: A Military History of the Second Punic War. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Le Bohec, Y. (2011), ‘The “Third Punic War”: The Siege of Carthage (148-146 bc)’, in D. Hoyos (ed.), A Companion to the Punic Wars. 430-445. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Picard, C. (1983), ‘Carthage après Zama’, Semitica 33, 41-50.Google Scholar
Raven, S. (2012), Rome in Africa. 3rd edn. London.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. (1976), Declaring War in the Roman Republic in the Period of Transmarine Expansion. Brussels.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. (2015), ‘Appian, Polybius, and the Romans’ War with Antiochus the Great: A Study in Appian’s Sources and Methods’, in K. Welch (ed.), Appian’s Roman History: Empire and Civil War. 65-124. Swansea.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. (2012), Rome and the Mediterranean, 290-146 bc: The Imperial Republic. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Saumagne, C. (1966), La Numidie et Rome: Masinissa et Jugurtha. Essai. Paris.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1967), A Historical Commentary on Polybius. vol. 2: Commentary on Books 7-18. Oxford.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (1965), ‘Massinissa’, JRS 55, 149-160.Google Scholar