Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:59:01.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Man in the Background: The Search for Maecenas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2020

Ronald T. Ridley*
Affiliation:
The University of [email protected]

Abstract

Since the late sixteenth century parts of the ‘imperial frieze’ of the Ara Pacis have been known. The most striking figure in the background of the southern frieze is that long thought to be a portrait of Maecenas, the Etruscan prince and literary patron of the Augustan era. This article attempts three things: to discover

  1. 1. Where and how this identification originated,

  2. 2. What evidence there now is for that identification, and

  3. 3. What alternative identifications can be offered.

The bibliography is substantial, the trail is complicated and highly paradoxical, and fantasy has often played a large role. The ‘evidence’ in play for centuries has sometimes evaporated into thin air. The identities proposed are, in fact, numerous. Not of least interest is the hidden or mistaken identity, in turn, of crucial modern scholars. A method is proposed at last for evaluating the identifications of this background portrait, including obvious comparison with other background figures. This analysis emphasizes how much is still not known about the most famous piece of Augustan art. An attempt is nevertheless made in the last analysis, to support what can be offered, in the light of current understanding, as the most plausible identification.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amelung, W. (1897), Führer durch die Antiken in Florenz. Munich.Google Scholar
André, J. M. (1967), Mécène. Essai de biographie spirituelle. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreae, B. (1978), Roman Art. London.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. (2005/6), ‘Die Bildnisse des Gaius Cilnius Maecenas in Arezzo und an der Ara Pacis’, MDAI(R) 112, 121–61.Google Scholar
Avallone, R. (1962), Mecenate. Naples.Google Scholar
Barbein, A. (1975), ‘Die Ara Pacis Augustae’, JÖAI 90, 242–66.Google Scholar
Baudelot de Dairval, C. C. (1717), ‘Lettre sur le prétendu Solon des pierres gravées’, MMAI 3, 268–73, and printed separately.Google Scholar
Bernoulli, J. J. (1882), Römische Ikonographie. 2 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bianchi, E. (1994), Ara Pacis Augustae. Rome.Google Scholar
Billows, R. (1993), ‘The Religious Procession on the Ara Pacis’, JRA 6, 8092.Google Scholar
Bonanno, A. (1976), Roman Relief Portraiture to Septimius Severus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bracci, D. (1786), Commentaria de antiquis sculptoribus qui sua nomina inciderunt in gemmis et cammeis. 2 vols. Florence.Google Scholar
Budde, L. (1957), Der Friedensaltar des Augustus. Hannover.Google Scholar
Cafiero, M. (1989), Ara Pacis Augustae. Rome.Google Scholar
Charbonneaux, J. (1948), L'art du siècle d'Auguste. Paris.Google Scholar
Chabouillet, J. (1858), Catalogue général et raisonné des camées et pierres gravées de la Bibliothèque Impériale. Paris.Google Scholar
Conlin, D. (1997), The Artists of the Ara Pacis. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Domaszewski, A. (1903), ‘Die Familie des Augustus’, JÖAI, 5766.Google Scholar
Deswarte-Rosa, S. (1991), ‘Le Cardinal Giovanni Ricci de Montepulciano’, in A. Chastel and P. Morel (eds.) La Villa Médicis: 2, Études. Rome, 111–69.Google Scholar
Ducati, P. (1920), L'arte classica. Torino.Google Scholar
Ducati, P. (1939), L'arte classica. 3rd ed. Torino.Google Scholar
Dütschke, H. (1880), Über ein römischen Relief mit Darstellung der Familie des Augustus. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Earl, D. (1968), The Age of Augustus. London.Google Scholar
Foresta, S. (2002), ‘I fregi con processione dell'Ara Pacis Augustae’, BCAR 103, 4366.Google Scholar
Frova, A. (1961), L'arte di Roma e del mondo romano. Torino.Google Scholar
Furtwängler, A. (1888), ‘Studien über die Gemmen mit künstlerischen Inschriften’, JDAI 3, 297–8.Google Scholar
Furtwängler, A. (1900), Die antiken Gemmen. 3 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gardthausen, V. (1896), Augustus und seine Zeit. 3 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gardthausen, V. (1907), Der Altar des Kaiserfriedens. Lepizig.Google Scholar
Goette, H. (1985), ‘Zum Bildnis des Cicero’, MDAI(R) 92, 291318.Google Scholar
Gori, A. (1731–1743), Museum Florentinum. 3 vols. Florence.Google Scholar
Grummond, N. (ed.) (1996), Encyclopedia of the History of Classical Archaeology. 2 vols. Westport.Google Scholar
Hanell, K. (1960), ‘Das Opfer des Augustus an der Ara Pacis’, ORom 2, 33123.Google Scholar
Hannestad, N. (1986), Roman Art and Imperial Policy. Jutland.Google Scholar
Hannestad, N. (1994), Tradition in Late Antique Sculpture. Aarhus.Google Scholar
Helbig, W. (1912–1913), Führer durch die öffentlichen Sammlungen klassischer Altertümer in Rom. 3rd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Holloway, R. (1984), ‘Who's Who on the Ara Pacis?’, in Bonacasa, N. (ed.), Alessandria e il mondo ellenistico-romano. 3 vols. Rome, 625–8.Google Scholar
Jones, H. S. (1903–1904), ‘Ara Pacis Augustae’, Journal of the British and American Archaeological Society of Rome 3, 251–8.Google Scholar
Jones, H. S. (1926), Catalogue of the Ancient Sculptures Preserved in the Municipal Collections of Rome: The Sculptures of the Palazzo dei Conservatori. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kleiner, D. (1978), ‘The Great Frieze of the Ara Pacis’, MEFRA 90, 753–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiner, D. (1982), Roman Sculpture. New Haven.Google Scholar
Koeppel, G. (1987), ‘Die historischen Reliefs der römischen Kaiserzeit, V. Ara Pacis Augustae, 1’, BJ 187, 101–57.Google Scholar
Köhler, H. K. E. (1851), Gesammelte Schriften, III: Abhandlung über die geschnittenen Steine mit den Namen der Künstler. St Petersburg.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. (1983), Ara Pacis Augustae: in occasione del restauro della fronte orientale. Rome.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. (2002), ‘Silenzio e compianto dei morti nella processione dell'Ara Pacis’, in Damaskos, D. (ed.), Αρχαία ɛλληνική γλυπτική. Aφιέρωμα στη μνήμη του γλύπτη Στέλιου Τριάντη. Athens, 269313.Google Scholar
Le Doze, P. (2014), Mécène, ombres et flamboyances. Paris.Google Scholar
Löwy, E. (1926), ‘Bemerkungen zur Ara Pacis’, JÖAI 23, 5361.Google Scholar
Lugli, G. (1935), ‘In attesa dello scavo dell'Ara Pacis’, Capitolium 11, 1740.Google Scholar
Mariette, P. J. (1750), Traité des pierres gravées. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Milani, L. (1891), ‘Le recenti scoperte di antichità in Verona’, MDAI(R) 6, 285301.Google Scholar
Mlasowsky, A. (2010), Ara Pacis Augustae: ein Staatsmonument des Augustus auf dem Marsfeld. Mainz.Google Scholar
Monaco, G. (1934), ‘L'iconografia imperiale nell'Ara Pacis Augustae’, BCAR 62, 1740.Google Scholar
Moretti, G. (1948), Ara Pacis Augustae. Rome.Google Scholar
Mountford, P. (2019), Maecenas. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orsini, F. (1570), Imagines et elogia virorum illustrium. Florence.Google Scholar
Paribeni, R. (1932), Ara Pacis Augustae. Rome.Google Scholar
Petersen, E. A. H. (1902), Ara Pacis Augustae. Vienna.Google Scholar
Petersen, E. A. H. (1906), ‘Die Ara Pacis Augustae’, JOAI 9, 298315.Google Scholar
Pollini, J. (1986), ‘Ahenobarbi, Appuleii, and Some Others on the Ara Pacis’, AJA 90, 453–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponti, E. (1938), Ara Pacis Augustae: Origine–Storia–Significato. Rome.Google Scholar
Rehak, P. (2001), ‘The Fourth Flamen of the Ara Pacis’, JRA 15, 285–8.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. (1895), Pierres gravées des collections de Marlborough et d'Orléans. Paris.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. (1909–1912), Répertoire de reliefs grecs et romains. 3 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Richmond, I. A. (1949), Roman Art and Archaeology. London.Google Scholar
Richter, G. (1971), Engraved Gems of the Romans. London.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. (2005), ‘The Absent Pontifex Maximus’, Historia 54, 275300.Google Scholar
Rose, C. B. (1990), ‘“Princes” and Barbarians on the Ara Pacis’, AJA 94, 453–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossini, O. (2012), Ara Pacis. Milan.Google Scholar
Ryberg, I. S. (1949), ‘The Procession of the Ara Pacis’, MAAR 19, 79101.Google Scholar
Settis, S. (1988), ‘Die Ara Pacis’, in Settis, S. (ed.), Kaiser Augustus and die verlorene Republik. Berlin, 400–26.Google Scholar
Sieveking, J. (1907), ‘Zur Ara Pacis Augustae’, JÖAI 10, 175–90.Google Scholar
Simon, E. (1967), Ara Pacis Augustae. New York.Google Scholar
Simon, E. (2012), Ara Pacis Augustae. 2nd ed. Dettelbach.Google Scholar
Smentek, K. (2014), Mariette and the Science of the Connoisseur in Eighteenth-Century Europe. London.Google Scholar
Strong, E. (1907), Roman Sculpture from Augustus to Constantine. London.Google Scholar
Studniczka, F. (1909), ‘Zur Ara Pacis’, AbhLeip 27, 901–44.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1984), ‘Neglected Children on the Ara Pacis’, AJA 88, 583–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syme, R. (1986), The Augustan Aristocracy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Torelli, M. (1982), Typology and Structure of Roman Historical Reliefs. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Toynbee, J. (1953), ‘The Ara Pacis Reconsidered and Historical Art in Roman Italy’, PBA 39, 6795.Google Scholar
Visconti, E. Q. (1818), Iconografia romana. 3 vols. Milan.Google Scholar
Visconti, E. Q. (1837), Un busto colossale in marmo di Gaio Cilnio Mecenate. Paris.Google Scholar
Wickhoff, F. (1900), Roman Art: Some of its Principles and their Application to Early Christian Painting, trans. Strong, Eugenie. London.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J. (1760), Description des pierres gravées du feu Baron Stosch. Florence.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J. (2006), History of the Art of Antiquity, trans. Mallgrave, H.. Los Angeles = (1764) Geschichte der Kunst des Altertums. Dresden.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1988), The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar