Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T13:20:46.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Either … or’ versus ‘both … and’: A Dramatic Device in Sophocles*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

D. A. Hester
D. A. Hester*
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the prologue of the Women of Trachis, Deianeira is telling Hyllus of an oracle concerning her husband, Heracles, which is about to be fulfilled. The relevant passage (lines 76-85 of the OCT) is:

As Deianeira states it, a critical issue is about to be decided. Hitherto she has had an absentee husband; Heracles has visited her but rarely, spending most of his time abroad in various exploits – humanitarian, military, and sexual. But the gods (to be exact, the oracle of Zeus at Dodona) have decreed that this half-marriage will not continue. Either her husband will die, in which case she has no interest in surviving him, or his labours will come to an end and he will live in peace, which she interprets as a life of domestic bliss with her. She sends their son, Hyllus, to help him; later she will act more drastically and send a robe dyed in what she believes is a love-charm to rekindle his love for her, but is in fact a deadly poison. By the time he is brought back in his mortal agony, she will have killed herself, and his only feeling for her will be regret that her suicide has deprived him of taking vengeance on her. Such will be the consequences of her interpretation of the oracle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 13 , 1979 , pp. 12 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Note I have listed only recent discussions of the specific relevant passages, and have ignored standard works on Sophocles in general. A fuller bibliography will be found in my forthcoming book Problems in the Interpretation of Sophocles.

A WOMEN OF TRACHIS

Dickerson, J.W., The structure and interpretation of S.’s ‘T.’ (diss. Princeton 1972),esp. 137–40, 358–63,443–9.Google Scholar
Kane, R.L., Hoia an genoito (diss. Princeton 1969), 21–87.Google Scholar
Kapsomenos, S.G.S., ’s ‘T.’ und ihr Vorbild (Athens 1963), esp. 107–14.Google Scholar
Kitto, H.D.F., Poiesis (Sather C.L. 36 [1966]), esp. 188–99.Google Scholar
Krol, C., Der Tiefer Gehalt der T.’des S. (diss. Giessen 1971), esp. 4–27.Google Scholar
Schwinge, E.R., Die Stellung der Trach. im Werk des S. (Göttingen 1962) (also diss. Hamburg 1960) (on dating).Google Scholar

B ANTIGONE

Alexanderson, B., Eranos 64 (1966), 89–92.Google Scholar
Benardete, S., Interpretation 4 (1975), 187–96.Google Scholar
Coleman, R., PCPhS n.s. 18 (1972), 9–10.Google Scholar
Else, G.F., Heidelb. Akad. der Wiss. Phil-Hist. Klasse Abh. 1976. 1. 43–9.Google Scholar
Gardiner, C.P., The dramatic character and function of the Sophoclean Chorus (diss. Princeton 1974), 135–6.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., An introduction to metaphysics, trans. Manheim, R. (New Haven 1959), 146–65.Google Scholar
Hester, D.A., Mnemosyne 24 (1971), 26–7 and 41–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesky, A., Festschrift W. Schadewaldt (Stuttgart 1970), 79–91.Google Scholar
McDevitt, A.S., Ramus 1 (1972), 152–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, G., Hermes 89 (1961), 399–406.Google Scholar
O’Brien, J., CJ 71 (1975–6), 138–51.Google Scholar
Pastrana Riol, A.Helmantica 18 (1967), 241–72 and 20 (1969), 193–265.Google Scholar
Ronnet, G., REG 80 (1967), 100–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, E., Philologus 91 (1936), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schottlaender, R., Altertum 13 (1967), 142–6.Google Scholar
Schwinge, E.R., Gymnasium 78 (1971), 304–7.Google Scholar
Versényi, L.Man’s Measure (Albany 1974), 208–13.Google Scholar

C OEDIPUS REX

Becker, C.Studien zum Sophokleischen Chor (diss. Frankfurt 1950), 34–44.Google Scholar
Errandonea, E.Textos y Estudios (La Plata 1952), reprinted in Sófocles (Madrid 1958), 17–60 andHermes 81 (1953), 129–45.Google Scholar
Gardiner, C.P.op. cit. 128–9.Google Scholar
Gellie, G.H.AJPh 85 (1964), 113–23.Google Scholar
Hester, D.A.PCPhS n.s. 23 (1977), 41–3.Google Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R.P.JHS 91 (1971), 119–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamerbeek, J.C.WS 79 (1966), 80–92.Google Scholar

D. A. Hester

Lesky, A.op. cit. 91–7.Google Scholar
Müller, G.Hermes 95 (1967), 269–91.Google Scholar
Oliveira Pulquerio, M.de Humanitas 19–20 (1967–8), 19–35.Google Scholar
Sanchez, , Lasso de la Vega, J., Cuademos de Fil. Clas. 1971. 2, 59–63.Google Scholar
Vellacott, P.H., G and R 14 (1967), 116–19, reprinted in Berkowitz, L./Brunner, T.F.Oedipus Tyrannus (New York 1970), 236–40.Google Scholar