Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:15:01.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Citizenship as a Reward or Punishment? Factoring Language into the Latin Settlement*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

Owen Stewart
Owen Stewart*
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Latin Settlement, which was supposedly initiated in 338 BC, Rome organised many of the incorporated communities into either the civitas or civitas sine suffragio. Livy, and those scholars who have accepted his explanation, claim that the use of these two types of citizenship was influenced by the political and military circumstances of each community’s incorporation. Such an argument posits that Rome judged each community on the basis of its past behaviour and ‘rewarded’ or ‘punished’ it accordingly, using these different forms of citizenship. However, Livy’s anachronistic and inconsistent approach to the Roman franchise undermines this explanation – at least in its simplest form. This paper highlights the inconsistencies in Livy’s account of the Latin Settlement and offers an alternative explanation for the differing grants of citizenship. It is argued that the pre-existing languages and cultures of the different communities need to be taken into account, as does the legal significance of the use of Latin at Rome. In sum, this paper argues that the decision to incorporate a community as a civitas or as a civitas sine suffragio was not straightforwardly based on the political or military circumstances of each community’s incorporation, but also (or rather) involved the recognition of cultural and linguistic differences in each community and the consequent practicalities of the inclusion of each in Rome’s legal and political apparatus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 51: Thematic Issue: Politics and Power in Early Rome 509-264 BC , 2017 , pp. 186 - 201
Copyright
© The Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was first presented at the Auckland conference and then at the conference for the Australasian Society for Classical Studies in Melbourne, 2016. I am indebted to the audiences of both these conferences for their useful suggestions. I am also grateful to Jayne Knight, Jonathan Wallis, the anonymous reviewer, and the editors for commenting on subsequent versions.

References

Adams, J. N. (2003), Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2015), Roman Social Imaginaries: Language and Thought in Context of Empire. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badian, E. (1958), Foreign Clientelae (264-70 BC). Oxford.Google Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, L. (2014), Law and Power in the Making of the Roman Commonwealth , translated by L. Kopp. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (1995), The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC). London.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (1992), The Roman Republic, 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (2011), Imagines Italicae: A Corpus of Italic Inscriptions , vol. 1. London.Google Scholar
Degrassi, A. (1954), Fasti Capitolini. Turin.Google Scholar
Dench, E. (2005), Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2001), Latin Language and Latin Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, M. (1984), Campania. London.Google Scholar
Fronda, M. P. (2010), Between Rome and Carthage: Southern Italy During the Second Punic War. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1962), ‘Italia e Roma nella “storia” di Velleio Patercolo’, CS 1, 1-9.Google Scholar
Galsterer, H. (1976), Herrschaft und Verwaltung im republikanischen Italien. Munich.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. F. (1993), Being a Roman Citizen. London.Google Scholar
Howarth, R. S. (2006), The Origins of Roman Citizenship. New York.Google Scholar
Humbert, M. (1978), Municipium et Civitas Sine Suffragio: L’organisation de la Conquête Jusqu’à la Guerre Sociale. Rome.Google Scholar
Kaimio, J. (1979), The Romans and the Greek Language. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. (1966), An Introduction of Roman Legal and Constitutional History, translated by J. M. Kelly. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lapyrionok, R. V. (2013), ‘Some Critical Notes on Peter Brunt’s Reconstruction of the Conduct of the Roman Census’, in A. Mehl, A. Makhlayuk, and O. Gabelko (eds), Ruthenia Classica Aetatis Novae: A Collection of Works by Russian Scholars in Ancient Greek and Roman History. 133-143. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. Payne, R. E. and Weisweiler, J.(2016), ‘Cosmopolitan Politics: The Assimilation and Subordination of Elite Cultures’, in M. Lavan, R. E. Payne, and J. Weisweiler (eds), Cosmopolitanism and Empire: Universal Rulers, Local Elites, and Cultural Integration in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean. 1-28. New York.Google Scholar
Miles, G. (1995), Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2007), ‘The civitas sine suffragio: Ancient Concepts and Modern Ideology’, Historia 56, 141-158.Google Scholar
Mousourakis, G. (2007), A Legal History of Rome. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, S. P. (1997-8), A Commentary on Livy, Books VI-X, vols 1-2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. (2006), ‘Between Myth and History’, in N. Rosenstein and R. Morstein-Marx (eds), A Companion to the Roman Republic. 125-146. Oxford.Google Scholar
Salmon, E. T. (1969), Roman Colonization under the Republic. London.Google Scholar
Salmon, E. T. (1982), The Making of Roman Italy. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Scopacasa, R. (2015), Ancient Samnium: Settlement, Culture, and Identity between History and Archaeology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1973), The Roman Citizenship, 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. (1960), I rapporti romano-ceriti e l’origine della “civitas sine suffragio”. Rome.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1966), Roman Voting Assemblies: From the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Terrenato, N. (2013), ‘Patterns of Culture Change in Roman Italy’, in M. Jehne, B. Linke, and J. Rüpke (eds), Religiöse Vielfalt und soziale Integration. Die Bedeutung der Religion für die kulturelle Identität und politische Stabilität im republikanischen Italien. 43-60. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Toynbee, A. J. (1965), Hannibal’s Legacy: The Hannibalic War’s Effects on Roman Life , vol. 1. London.Google Scholar
Vishnia, R. F. (2012), Roman Elections in the Age of Cicero. New York.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. (1972), ‘Nationality as a Factor in Roman History’, HSCP 76, 145-168.Google Scholar