Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:27:45.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triple splitting and z-rays in polar ionograms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2015

Carlo Scotto
Carlo Scotto*
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via di Vigna Murata 605, Rome, Italy
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The theory of propagation in a direction almost parallel to the Earth’s magnetic field is reviewed, calculating the group refractive index of the ordinary ray in the presence of electron-neutral collisions. An electron density profile is estimated from the ordinary trace and is used to compute the z-ray trace. It is shown that this reconstruction can help to identify the rare cases of z-rays from among the numerous cases of duplicate ordinary traces, due to reflection from two different directions.

Keywords

ionosondeionosphereradio propagation
Type
Physical Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 383 - 387
Check for updates
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowman, G.G. 1960. Triple splitting with the F2-region of the ionosphere at high and mid-latitudes. Planetary and Space Science, 2, 214–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckersley, T.L. 1950. Coupling of the ordinary or extraordinary rays in the ionosphere. Proceedings of the Physical Society, B63, 10.1088/0370-1301/63/1/308.Google Scholar
Ellis, G.R. 1953. F-region triple splitting. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 3, 263–269.Google Scholar
Ellis, G.R. 1956. The z propagation hole in the ionosphere. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 8, 43–54.Google Scholar
Mjølhus, E. 1990. On linear conversion in a magnetized plasma. Radio Science, 25, 1321–1339.Google Scholar
Pezzopane, M. & Scotto, C. 2005. The INGV software for the automatic scaling of foF2 and MUF(3000)F2 from ionograms: a performance comparison with ARTIST 4.01 from Rome data. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 67, 1063–1073.Google Scholar
Piggott, W.R. & Rawer, K., eds . 1972. URSI handbook of ionogram interpretation and reduction. Report UAG 23. Asheville, NC: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental Data Service, 326 pp.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, J.A. 1959. The magneto-ionic theory and its applications to the ionosphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 206 pp.Google Scholar
Rydbeck, O.E.H. 1950. Magneto-ionic triple splitting of ionospheric waves. Journal of Applied Physics, 21, 10.1063/1.1699577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotto, C. 2009. Electron density profile calculation technique for Autoscala ionogram analysis. Advances in Space Research, 44, 10.1016/j.asr.2009.04.037.Google Scholar
Scotto, C. & Pezzopane, M. 2002. A software for automatic scaling of foF2 and MUF(3000)F2 from ionograms. Proceedings of URSI Twenty-Seventh General Assembly, Maastricht, Holland.Google Scholar
Scotto, C. & Pezzopane, M. 2012. Automatic scaling of polar ionograms. Antarctic Science, 24, 10.1017/S0954102011000587.Google Scholar
Scotto, C. & Settimi, A. 2013. The effect of collisions in ionogram inversion. Advances in Space Research, 51, 697–701.Google Scholar
Scotto, C., Pezzopane, M. & Zolesi, B. 2011. Estimating the vertical electron density profile from an ionogram: on the passage from true to virtual heights via the target function method. Radio Science, 47, 10.1029/2011RS004833.Google Scholar
Shinn, D.H. & Whale, H.A. 1952. Group velocities and group heights from the magneto-ionic theory. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 2, 85–105.Google Scholar