Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:08:01.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pygoscelis penguin diets on King George Island, South Shetland Islands, with a special focus on the krill Euphausia superba

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2020

Anna Panasiuk*
Affiliation:
University of Gdansk, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, Institute of Oceanography, Department of Marine Plankton Research, J.M. Piłsudskiego 46, 81-378Gdynia, Poland
Justyna Wawrzynek-Borejko
Affiliation:
University of Gdansk, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, Institute of Oceanography, Department of Marine Plankton Research, J.M. Piłsudskiego 46, 81-378Gdynia, Poland
Aleksandra Musiał
Affiliation:
University of Gdansk, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, Institute of Oceanography, Department of Marine Plankton Research, J.M. Piłsudskiego 46, 81-378Gdynia, Poland
Małgorzata Korczak-Abshire
Affiliation:
Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawińskiego 5a, 02-106Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

In the krill-based ecosystem of the Antarctic, fluctuations in the distribution and abundance of Euphausia superba may have strong impacts on predator populations; thus, it is crucial to observe the feeding ecology of Antarctic predators, especially in the light of climate change and increasing human pressure. We determined the composition of euphausiid species in diet samples collected from Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo (Pygoscelis papua) penguins on King George Island (South Shetlands Islands) during a breeding season. For all three penguin species, euphausiids (mainly E. superba) represented almost the entirety of researched stomach samples (i.e. 99.9% in the case of Adélie and chinstrap penguins), while gentoo penguins also proved to feed on fish (99.4% krill; 0.5% fish). Analysed material differed in the size of eaten E. superba specimens, with the smallest crustaceans consumed by Adélie penguins. Furthermore, we found differences in the ratio of consumed krill and krill size. Such disparities may be a result of sex-based differences and slight differences in feeding areas between the birds. Additionally, we noted some fragments of plastic debris in the investigated penguin diet samples.

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, D.G., Wilson, P.R., Barton, K.J., Ballard, G., Nur, N. & Karl, B. 1998. Diet and foraging effort of Adélie penguins in relation to pack-ice conditions in the southern Ross Sea. Polar Biology, 20, 311319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessa, F., Ratcliffe, N., Otero, V., Sobral, P., Marques, J.C., Waluda, C.M., et al. 2019. Microplastics in gentoo penguins from the Antarctic region. Scientific Reports, 9, 10.1038/s41598-019-50621-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cimino, M.A., Lynch, H.J., Saba, V.S. & Oliver, M.J. 2016. Projected asymmetric response of Adélie penguins to Antarctic climate change. Scientific Reports, 6, 10.1038/srep18820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, J., Manly, B., Kerry, K., Gardner, H., Franchi, E., Corsolini, S. & Focardi, S. 1998. Sex differences in Adélie penguin foraging strategies. Polar Biology, 20, 248258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrijević, D., Paiva, V.H., Ramos, J., Seco, A.J., Ceia, F.R., Tiago, N.C., et al. 2018. Isotopic niches of sympatric gentoo and chinstrap penguins: evidence of competition for Antarctic krill? Polar Biology, 41, 16551669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcada, J., Trathan, P.N., Reid, K., Murphy, E.J. & Croxall, J.P. 2006. Contrasting population changes in sympatric penguin species in association with climate warming. Global Change Biology, 12, 411423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinke, J.T., Trivelpiece, S.G. & Trivelpiece, W.Z. 2017a. Variable vital rates and the risk of population declines in Adélie penguins from the Antarctic Peninsula region. Ecosphere, 8, 10.1002/ecs2.1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinke, J.T., Cossio, A.M., Goebel, M.E., Reiss, C.S., Trivelpiece, W.Z. & Watters, G.M. 2017b. Identifying risk: concurrent overlap of the Antarctic krill fishery with krill-dependent predators in the Scotia Sea. PLoS One, 12, 10.1371/journal.pone.0170132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, S., Varsani, A., Dugger, K.M., Ballard, G. & Ainley, D.G. 2016. Sex-based differences in Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) chick growth rates and Ddiet. PLoS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0149090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juáres, M.A., Casaux, R., Corbalán, A., Blanco, G., Perchivale, P.J., Coria, N.R. & Santos, M.M. 2018. Diet of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) at Stranger Point (25 de Mayo/King George Island, Antarctica) over a 13-year period (2003–2015). Polar Biology, 41, 10.1007/s00300-017-2191-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokobun, N., Takahashi, A., Mori, Y., Watanabe, S. & Shin, H.C. 2010. Comparison of diving behavior and foraging habitat use between chinstrap and gentoo penguins breeding in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Marine Biology, 157, 811825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, E.S., Hill, S.L., Hinke, J.T., Phillips, T. & Watters, G.M. 2018. Impacts of rising sea temperature on krill increase risks for predators in the Scotia Sea. PLoS One, 13, 10.1371/journal.pone.0191011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korczak-Abshire, M., Węgrzyn, M., Angiel, P.J. & Lisowska, M. 2013. Pygoscelid penguins breeding distribution and population trends at Lions Rump rookery, King George Island. Polish Polar Research, 1, 8799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korczak-Abshire, M., Zmarz, A., Rodzewicz, M., Kycko, M., Karsznia, I. & Chwedorzewska, K.J. 2019. Study of fauna population changes on Penguin Island and Turret Point Oasis (King George Island, Antarctica) using unmanned aerial vehicle. Polar Biology, 42, 217224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lishman, G.S. 1985. The food and feeding ecology of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) and chinstrap penguins (P. antarctica) at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Journal of Zoology, 205, 245263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynnes, A.S., Reid, K. & Croxall, J.P. 2004. Diet and reproductive success of Adélie and chinstrap penguins: linking response of predators to prey population dynamics. Polar Biology, 27, 544554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A.K. & Trivelpiece, W.Z. 2007. Cycles of Euphausia superba recruitment evident in the diet of pygoscelid penguins and net trawls in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 30, 16151623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A.K., Kappes, M.A., Trivelpiece, S.G. & Trivelpiece, W.Z. 2010. Foraging-niche separation of breeding gentoo and chinstrap penguins, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. The Condor, 112, 683695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, E.P., Fraser, W.R., Patterson-Fraser, D.L., Cimino, M.A., Torres, L.G. & Friedlaender, A.S. 2018. Spatial niche partitioning may promote coexistence of Pygoscelis penguins as climate-induced sympatry occurs. Ecology and Evolution, 8, 10.1002/ece3.4445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto, M.B.L.C., Siciliano, S. & Di Beneditto, A.P.M. 2007. Stomach contents of the Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus from the northern distribution limit on the Atlantic coast of Brazil. Marine Ornithology, 35, 7778.Google Scholar
Polito, M.J., Clucas, G.V., Hart, T. & Trivelpiece, W.Z. 2012. A simplified method of determining the sex of Pygoscelis penguins using bill measurements. Marine Ornithology, 40, 8994.Google Scholar
Reid, K., Trathan, P.N., Croxall, J.P. & Hill, H.J. 1996. Krill caught by predators and nets: differences between species and techniques. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 40, 1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, G., Williams, R., Green, K.E.N. & Robertson, L. 1994. Diet composition of emperor penguin chicks Aptenodytes forsten' at two Mawson Coast colonies, Antarctica. Ibis, 136, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rombolá, E.F., Marschoff, E. & Coria, N. 2010. Inter-annual variability in chinstrap penguin diet at South Shetland and South Orkneys Islands. Polar Biology, 33, 799806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scolaro, J.A. 1987. Sexing fledglings and yearlings of Magellanic penguins by discriminant analysis of morphometric parameters. Colonial Waterbirds, 10, 5054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, V. 2000. Krill (Euphausiacea) life history and aspects of population dynamics. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57(S3), 130150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sierakowski, K., Korczak-Abshire, M. & Jadwiszczak, P. 2017. Changes in bird communities of Admiralty Bay, King George Island (West Antarctic): insights from monitoring data (1977–1996). Polish Polar Research, 38, 231262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter Braak, C.J.F. & Šmilauer, P. 2012. Canoco reference manual and user's guide: software for ordination, version 5.0. Ithaca, NY, USA: Microcomputer Power, 496 pp.Google Scholar
Trivelpiece, W.Z., Trivelpiece, S.G. & Volkman, N.J. 1987. Ecological segregation of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. Ecology, 68, 351361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivelpiece, W.Z., Trivelpiece, S.G., Geupel, G.R., Kjelmyr, J. & Volkman, N.J. 1990. Adélie and chinstrap penguins: their potential as monitors of the Southern Ocean marine ecosystem. In Kerry, K. & Hempel, G.,eds. Antarctic ecosystems - ecological change and conservation. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 191202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivelpiece, W.Z., Hinke, J.T., Miller, A.K., Reiss, C.S., Trivelpiece, S.G. & Watters, G.M. 2011. Variability in krill biomass links harvesting and climate warming to penguin population changes in Antarctica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 76257628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volkman, N.J., Presler, P. & Trivelpiece, W.Z. 1980. Diet of pygoscelid penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. The Condor, 82, 373378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, C.L., Griffiths, H.J., Waluda, C.M., Thorpe, S.E., Loaiza, I., Moreno, B., et al. 2017. Microplastics in the Antarctic marine system: an emerging area of research. Science of the Total Environment, 598, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weimerskirch, H., Inchausti, P., Guinet, C. & Barbraud, C. 2003. Trends in bird and seal populations as indicators of a system shift in the Southern Ocean. Antarctic Science, 15, 249256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M.G. & Conroy, W.H. 1975. Aspects of competition between Pygoscelis penguins at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Ibis, 117, 371373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.P. 1984. An improved stomach pump for penguins and other seabirds. Journal of Field Ornithology, 55, 109112.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.P. 2010. Resource partitioning and niche hyper-volume overlap in free-living pygoscelid penguins. Functional Ecology, 24, 646657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xavier, J.C., Trathan, P.N., Ceia, F.R., Tarling, G.A., Adlard, S., Fox, D., et al. 2017. Sexual and individual foraging segregation in gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua from the Southern Ocean during an abnormal winter. PLoS One, 12, 10.1371/journal.pone.0174850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed