Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:13:16.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New counts of Adélie penguin populations at Scullin and Murray monoliths, Mac. Robertson Land, East Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2012

Colin J. Southwell  and
Louise M. Emmerson
Colin J. Southwell*
Affiliation:
Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, TAS 7050, Australia
Louise M. Emmerson
Affiliation:
Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, TAS 7050, Australia
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scullin and Murray monoliths are thought to hold the largest concentration of breeding seabirds in East Antarctica. The monoliths were designated as an Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA No. 164) in 2005 in recognition of the global importance of the seabird assemblages and to protect their outstanding ecological and scientific values. The management plan for the Scullin and Murray Monoliths ASPA encourages regular seabird population monitoring using methods such as aerial photography, but the complex logistics of accessing this remote site has until now limited quantitative assessment of the seabird populations to a single survey in 1986/87. In December 2010 we photographed the Adélie penguin population to provide the population counts presented here. We discuss the potential biases and uncertainties in estimating the breeding population from both the recent and 1980s population count data.

Keywords

Aerial photographyASPAbiasmanagement planpopulation countuncertainty
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , June 2013 , pp. 381 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, D.G., LeResche, R.E.Sladen, W.J.L. 1983. Breeding biology of the Adélie penguin. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 240 pp.Google Scholar
Alonso, J.C., Johnstone, G.W., Hindell, M., Osborne, P.Guard, R. 1987. Las aves del Monolito Scullin, Antartida Oriental (67°47′S, 66°42′E). In Castellvi, J., ed. Actas del segundo symposio Espanol de estudios Antarticos. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 375–386.Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). 2005. Management plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 164, Scullin and Murray Monoliths, Mac. Robertson Land. Measure 2, Annex N. Final Report of the Twenty-eighth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Stockholm, Sweden, June 2005.Google Scholar
ATCM (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting). 2010. Management plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 164, Scullin and Murray Monoliths, Mac. Robertson Land. Measure 13. Final Report of the Thirty-third Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Punta del Este, Uruguay, May 2010, http://www.ats.aq/documents/recatt/Att454_e.pdf.Google Scholar
Emmerson, L.Southwell, C. 2008. Sea ice cover and its influence on Adélie penguin reproductive performance. Ecology, 89, 2096–2102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J.Woehler, E.J. 2004. Can the Important Bird Area approach improve the Antarctic Protected Area system? Polar Record, 40, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenouvrier, S., Barbraud, C.Weimerskirch, H. 2006. Sea ice affects the population dynamics of Adélie penguins in Terre Adélie. Polar Biology, 29, 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinlay, J., Southwell, C.Trebilco, R. 2010. Integrating count effort by seasonally correcting animal population estimates (ICESCAPE): a method for estimating abundance and its uncertainty from count data using Adélie penguins as a case study. CCAMLR Science, 17, 213–227.Google Scholar
Newbery, K.B.Southwell, C. 2009. An automated camera system for remote monitoring in polar environments. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 55, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwell, C., McKinlay, J., Emmerson, L., Trebilco, R.Newbery, K. 2010. Improving estimates of Adélie penguin breeding population size: developing factors to adjust one-off population counts for availability bias. CCAMLR Science, 17, 229–241.Google Scholar
Taylor, R.H., Wilson, P.R.Thomas, B.W. 1990. Status and trends of Adélie penguin populations in the Ross Sea region. Polar Record, 26, 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Franeker, J.A., Gavrilo, M., Mehlum, F., Veit, R.R.Woehler, E.J. 1999. Distribution and abundance of the Antarctic petrel. Waterbirds, 22, 14–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanuki, Y.Naito, Y. 1992. Counting Adélie penguins at colonies: seasonal and annual changes. Antarctic Record, 36, 279–284.Google Scholar
Whitehead, M.D., Johnstone, G.W.Burton, H.R. 1990. Annual fluctuations in productivity and breeding success of Adélie penguins and fulmarine petrels in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica. In Kerry, K.R. & Hempel, G., eds. Antarctic ecosystems: ecological change and conservation. Berlin: Springer, 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar