Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:28:51.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular support for Pleistocene persistence of the continental Antarctic moss Bryum argenteum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2010

Simon F.K. Hills
Affiliation:
Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology & Evolution, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Mark I. Stevens*
Affiliation:
South Australian Museum, and School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Chrissen E.C. Gemmill
Affiliation:
Centre for Biodiversity and Ecology Research, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3240, Hamilton, New Zealand
*
*corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

We examined sequence variation of ITS and phy2 for Bryum argenteum from Antarctica, sub-Antarctic, New Zealand and Australia to understand better taxonomic delimitations and resolve relationships between these geographic regions. Bryum argenteum has been recorded as two species, B. argenteum and B. subrotundifolium, in all four regions with the latter now referred to as B. argenteum var. muticum. We found disagreement between taxon delimitations (based on morphology) and molecular markers. All continental Antarctic specimens consistently formed a monophyletic sister group that consisted of both morphologically identified B. argenteum varieties, separate to all non-Antarctic specimens (also consisting of both varieties). We suggest, contrary to previous records, that all continental Antarctic (Victoria Land) populations are referable to B. argenteum var. muticum, while sub-Antarctic, Australian and New Zealand populations included here are B. argenteum var. argenteum. Additionally, since there was less genetic diversity within Victoria Land, Antarctica, than observed between non-Antarctic samples, we suggest that this is, in part, due to a potentially lower rate of DNA substitution and isolation in northern and southern refugia within Victoria Land since the Pleistocene.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, B.J., Bardgett, R.D., Ayres, E., Wall, D.H., Aislabie, J., Bamforth, S., Bargagli, R., Cary, C., Cavacini, P., Connell, L., Convey, P., Fell, J.W., Frati, F., Hogg, I.D., Newsham, K.K., O’Donnell, A., Russell, N., Seppelt, R.D. Stevens, M.I. 2006. Diversity and distribution of Victoria Land biota. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 30033018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardot, J. 1907. Musci. National Antarctic Expedition 1901–1904, Natural History, Zoology, 3, 16.Google Scholar
Convey, P. Stevens, M.I. 2007. Antarctic biodiversity. Science, 317, 18771878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Convey, P., Gibson, J.A.E., Hillenbrand, C.-D., Hodgson, D.A., Pugh, P.J.A., Smellie, J.L. Stevens, M.I. 2008. Antarctic terrestrial life - challenging the history of the frozen continent? Biological Reviews, 83, 103117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Convey, P., Stevens, M.I., Hodgson, D.A., Hillenbrand, C.-D., Clarke, A., Pugh, P.J.A., Smellie, J.L. Cary, S.C. 2009. Exploring biological constraints on the glacial history of Antarctica. Quaternary Science Reviews, 28, 30353048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, A.J., Ashton, B., Cheung, M., Heled, J., Kearse, M., Moir, R., Stones-Havas, S., Thierer, T. Wilson, A. 2009. Geneious v4.7. Available from http://www.geneious.com/Google Scholar
Frénot, Y., Chown, S.L., Whinam, J., Selkirk, P., Convey, P., Skotnicki, M. Bergstrom, D. 2005. Biological invasions in the Antarctic: extent, impacts and implications. Biological Reviews, 80, 4572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, T.G.A., Kulle, D., Pannewitz, S., Sancho, L.G. Schroeter, B. 2005. UV-A protection in mosses growing in continental Antarctica. Polar Biology, 28, 822827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, S. Shaw, A.J. 2005. Selective sweeps and intercontinental migration in the cosmopolitan moss Ceratodon purpureus (Hedw.) Brid. Molecular Ecology, 14, 11211132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGaughran, A., Torricelli, G., Carapelli, A., Frati, F., Stevens, M.I., Convey, P. Hogg, I.D. 2010. Contrasting phylogeographic patterns for springtails reflect different evolutionary histories between the Antarctic Peninsula and continental Antarctica. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 103119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, J., Felicisima, Á.M., Cabezas, F., Burgaz, A.R. Martinez, I. 2004. Wind as a long-distance vehicle in the Southern Hemisphere. Science, 304, 11441147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakanishi, S. 1979. On the variation of leaf characters of an Antarctic moss, Bryum inconnexum. Memoirs of the National Institute of Polar Research, 11, 4757.Google Scholar
Ochi, H. 1979. A revision of the genus Bryum, Musci. Memoirs of the National Institute of Polar Research, 11, 7080.Google Scholar
Ochyra, R., Lewis Smith, R.I. Bednarek-Ochyra, H. 2008. The illustrated moss flora of Antarctica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 685 pp.Google Scholar
Rogers, S.O. Bendich, A.J. 1985. Extraction DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues. Plant Molecular Biology, 5, 6976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanmartín, I. Ronquist, F. 2004. Southern Hemisphere biogeography inferred by event-based models: plant versus animal patterns. Systematic Biology, 53, 216243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seppelt, R.D. Green, T.G.A. 1998. A bryophyte flora for southern Victoria Land, Antarctica. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 36, 617635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seppelt, R.D. Kanda, H. 1986. Morphological variation and taxonomic interpretation in the moss genus Bryum in Antarctica. Memoirs of the Natural Institute of Polar Research, 37, 2742.Google Scholar
Seppelt, R.D., Smith, R.I.L. Kanda, H. 1998. Antarctic bryology: past achievements and new perspectives. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 84, 203239.Google Scholar
Seppelt, R.D., Green, T.G.A., Schwartz, A.-M.J. Frost, A. 1992. Extreme southern locations for moss sporophytes in Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 4, 3739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seppelt, R.D., Türk, R., Green, T.G.A., Moser, G., Pannewitz, S., Sancho, L.G. Schroeter, B. 2010. Lichen and moss communities of Botany Bay, Granite Harbour, Ross Sea, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 22, 10.1017/S0954102010000568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skotnicki, M.L., Ninham, J.A. Selkirk, P.M. 2000. Genetic diversity, mutagenesis and dispersal of Antarctic mosses - a review of progress with molecular studies. Antarctic Science, 12, 363373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skotnicki, M.L., Mackenzie, A.M., Clements, M.A. Selkirk, P.M. 2005. DNA sequencing and genetic diversity of the 18S–26S nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS) in nine Antarctic moss species. Antarctic Science, 17, 377384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, J.R. Ramsay, H.P. 2002. The genus Anomobryum Schimp. (Bryopsida, Bryaceae) in Australia. Telopea, 9, 777792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, M.I. Hogg, I.D. 2003. Long-term isolation and recent range expansion from glacial refugia revealed for the endemic springtail Gomphiocephalus hodgsoni from Victoria Land, Antarctica. Molecular Ecology, 12, 23572369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, M.I., Greenslade, P., Hogg, I.D. Sunnucks, P. 2006. Southern Hemisphere springtails: could any have survived glaciation of Antarctica? Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 874882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, M.I., Hunger, S.A., Hills, S.F.K. Gemmill, C.E.C. 2007. Phantom hitch-hikers mislead estimates of genetic variation in Antarctic mosses. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 263, 191201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J. & White, T.J., eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 315322.Google Scholar