Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:05:54.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epibiotic relationships in the Antarctic benthos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2004

Julian Gutt
Affiliation:
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Columbusstraße, D-27568 Bremerhaven, Germany, E-mail: [email protected]
Thomas Schickan
Affiliation:
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Columbusstraße, D-27568 Bremerhaven, Germany, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

On the high Antarctic shelf, 374 different epibiotic relationships of the megafauna were photographically registered and statistically analysed. These comprised 47 different epibiotic and 96 substratum taxa and had obvious differences in abundance and presence in three different benthic assemblages. Six abundant obligatory relationships in which the epibiont occurred almost exclusively on one type of substratum had highly specialized epibionts. For an additional eight relationships, a statistical test revealed that the epibionts preferred specific living and elevated mineral substrata. Most of these relationships are interpreted as commensalism (sensu Odum) in which the suspension feeding epibiont profits from the elevated position. Here it has better access to food compared with life on the sediment. The evolution of a rich and mainly sessile epifauna on parts of the high Antarctic shelves and the successful development of epibiotic behaviour in other species are suggested as a major reason for the high species richness in the benthic fauna. The results provide evidence that the Antarctic megabenthos is more biologically accommodated than physically controlled.

Type
Papers—Life Sciences and Oceanography
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)