Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:21:41.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ECMWF versus Hellermann & Rosenstein stress climatology of the Southern Ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2004

Rita Glowienka-Hense
Affiliation:
Meteorologisches Institut, 5300 Bonn, Germany
Andreas Hense
Affiliation:
Meteorologisches Institut, 5300 Bonn, Germany
Christoph Völker
Affiliation:
Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung D-2850 Bremerhaven Germany

Abstract

A time series of wind stresses computed from European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) wind data is compared to the climatology of Hellermann & Rosenstein (HR) for the Southern Hemisphere. ECMWF stresses are generally stronger, especially in the westerly belt. However they have an overall lower meridional component than the HR data. The dominance of the half annual cycle relative to the annual wave in the zonal stress at middle to high latitudes, which is documented for independent data sets, is seen in the ECMWF but not in the HR data. ECMWF winds are also compared with measurements from three expeditions to the Weddell Sea by RV Polarstern. Good correlations between Polarstern and ECMWF winds are found but for single dates the differences are above 10 ms −1. The differences are found to be uncorrelated in space and are thus due to observational errors and to the unresolved small scale variance in the ECMWF analysed winds.

Type
Papers—Atmospheric Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)