Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T17:32:05.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brazil in Antarctica: 40 years of science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2020

Paulo E.A.S. Câmara Open the ORCID record for Paulo E.A.S. Câmara [Opens in a new window] ,
Ana F. Barros-Platiau Open the ORCID record for Ana F. Barros-Platiau [Opens in a new window] ,
Israel De Oliveira Andrade Open the ORCID record for Israel De Oliveira Andrade [Opens in a new window]  and
Giovanni R.L. Hillebrand Open the ORCID record for Giovanni R.L. Hillebrand [Opens in a new window]
Paulo E.A.S. Câmara*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade de Brasília, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, 70900-910, Brazil
Ana F. Barros-Platiau
Affiliation:
Brasilia Research Centre for Earth System Governance, Institute of International Relations, University of Brasilia, Campus Universitario Darcy Ribeiro, 70900-910, Brazil
Israel De Oliveira Andrade
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Economics Research (IPEA), SBS quadra 1, bloco J, ed. BNDES/IPEA, sala 920, Brasília, DF, 70076-900, Brazil
Giovanni R.L. Hillebrand
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Economics Research (IPEA), SBS quadra 1, bloco J, ed. BNDES/IPEA, sala 920, Brasília, DF, 70076-900, Brazil
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2021, Brazilian scientific research in Antarctica will reach its 40 anniversary, and in that period it has experienced good and bad times. How has Brazilian scientific research evolved since its first scientific mission to Antarctica? What were the conditions that enabled this research? How will Brazilian researchers work in the brand-new scientific station? Using an interdisciplinary approach, this article identifies tipping points and the national policy network that led to unstable funding policies. This article highlights four phases of Brazilian Antarctic science and states that there is a clear disconnect between the geopolitical and scientific priorities on one side and the political priorities, including the executive and the legislative powers, on the other.

Keywords

Antarctic TreatyComandante Ferraz StationPROANTARstrategic diplomacy
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 30 - 38
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J., Burns, N., Garrett, L., Haass, R. N., Ikenberry, J., Mahbubani, K., et al. 2020. How the world will look after the coronavirus pandemic. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2zUfeCf.Google Scholar
Andrade, I.O., Mattos, L.F., Cruz-Kaled, A.C. & Hillebrand, G.R.L. 2018. O Brasil na Antártica: a importância científica e geopolítica do PROANTAR no entorno estratégico brasileiro. Texto para Discussão 2425. Brasília: Ipea, 54 pp.Google Scholar
Barros-Platiau, A.F., Søendergaard, N. & Prantl, J. 2019. Policy networks in global environmental governance: connecting the Blue Amazon to Antarctica and the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) agendas. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 62, e006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyadjian, A., Câmara, P., Barros-Platiau, A.F. & Albergaria, F. In press. Grand challenges in Brazilian scientific research in Antarctica. In Barros-Platiau, A.F. & Oliveira, C., eds. Conservation of living resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction. BBNJ and Antarctica negotiations. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris.Google Scholar
Brazil. 1987. Decreto n° 94.401, de 3 de junho de 1987. Aprova a Política Nacional para Assuntos Antárticos. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2WBi7zQ.Google Scholar
Brazil. 1996. Portaria MCT n° 351, de 05.09.1996. Retrieved from www.mctic.gov.br.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2005a. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Relatório de Gestão Institucional. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Uhw71r.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2005b. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Edital CNPq n° 055/2005 – PROANTAR. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3aisHBk.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2006a. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Relatório de Gestão Institucional. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3bn2Hos.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2006b. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Edital MCT/CNPq n° 049/2006. Retrieved from http://resultado.cnpq.br/8142123003099466Google Scholar
Brazil. 2007. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Relatório de Gestão Institucional. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Ue9f30.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2008. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Edital n° 15/2008 – MCT/CNPq/FNDCT/CAPES/FAPEMIG/FAPERJ/FAPESP – Institutos Nacionais de Ciência e Tecnologia. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2QJpwuO.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2009. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Edital MCT/CNPq n° 023/2009. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3duiqUH.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2012a. Ministério da Defesa. Defense White Paper. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3dnHMmj.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2012b. Ministério da Defesa. Política Nacional de Defesa, Estratégia Nacional de Defesa. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3bbIEsp.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2013a. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Antarctic science for Brazil. An action plan for the 2013–2022 period. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3dubcju.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2013b. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. Chamada MCTI/CNPq/FNDCT-Ação Transversal n° 64/2013 – Programa Antártico Brasileiro – PROANTAR. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2QJ0iMZ.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2014a. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Chamada INCT – MCTI/CNPq/CAPES/FAPs n° 16/2014. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/39dXhdT.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2014b. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. Um Novo Plano de Ação para a Pesquisa Antártica Brasileira no período de 2013 a 2022. Public Audience at the Committee on Foreign Relations and National Defense, Chamber of Deputies. 8 April 2014. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/33K1NQ6.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2016. Câmara dos Deputados. Requerimento 5723/2016. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3de8qxI.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2018a. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Programa Institutos Nacionais de Ciência e Tecnologia – INCT. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3ag3ibi.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2018b. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações. Chamada CNPq/MCTI/CAPES/FNDCT n° 21/2018 – Programa Antártico Brasileiro – PROANTAR. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2QGeDcP.Google Scholar
Brazil. 2019. Decreto n° 9.759, de 11 de abril de 2019. Extingue e estabelece diretrizes, regras e limitações para colegiados da administração pública federal. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/35BD0ij.Google Scholar
CGEE. 2006. Avaliação Preliminar do Programa Antártico Brasileiro. Resumo executivo e relatório. Brasília: Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação, 49 pp.Google Scholar
Child, J. 1988. Antarctica and South American geopolitics: frozen Lebensraum. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 248 pp.Google Scholar
Coburn, S. 2017. Eyeing 2048: Antarctic Treaty System's mining ban. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 42, 1–6.Google Scholar
Goh, E. & Prantl, J. 2017. Why strategic diplomacy matters. East Asia Forum Quarterly, 9, 36–39.Google Scholar
Kennicutt, M.C., Kim, Y.D., Rogan-Finnemore, M. & Anandakrishnan, S. 2016. Delivering 21st century Antarctic and Southern Ocean science. Antarctic Science, 28, 407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, D. & Joyce, C. 1990. Antarctica, a tale of two treaties. New Scientist. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3b4cnnb.Google Scholar
Mattos, L.F. 2015. O Brasil e a adesão ao Tratado da Antártica: uma Análise de Política Externa no Governo Geisel. Niterói: Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos (PPGEST) da Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), 242 pp.Google Scholar
Mattos, L.F. & Câmara, P. 2020. A Ciência Antártica como Ferramenta Geopolítica para o Brasil. Revista Marítima Brasileira, 140, 15–23.Google Scholar
Narlikar, A. 2013. Negotiating the rise of new powers. International Affairs, 89, 561–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampaio, D., Cardone, I. & Abdenur, A. 2017. A modest but intensifying power? Brazil, the Antarctic Treaty System and Antarctica. In Dodds, K., Hemmings, A. & Roberts, P., eds. Handbook on the politics of Antarctica. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viola, E. & Gonçalves, V.K. 2019. Brazil ups and downs in global environmental governance in the 21st century. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 62, e010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar