Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:56:12.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biology of the Antarctic dragonfish Vomeridens infuscipinnis (Notothenioidei: Bathydraconidae)

Part of: Antarctic Science International Bursary collection: Biosciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2010

Kristen L. Kuhn ,
Thomas J. Near ,
H. William Detrich III  and
Joseph T. Eastman
Kristen L. Kuhn
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8105, USA
Thomas J. Near
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8105, USA
H. William Detrich III
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Joseph T. Eastman*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701-2979, USA
*
*author for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nineteen specimens of the rare dragonfish Vomeridens infuscipinnis were evaluated for meristic counts, morphometric measurements, vomerine teeth and the supratemporal canal, anatomical and histological observations of bone, cartilage and lipid, diet, and reproductive status. Seven individuals were measured for buoyancy. All specimens had small vomerine teeth that varied in number. There was also variability in the arrangement of the supratemporal pores and canals. Vomeridens possess a body with little bone and considerable amounts of cartilage and lipid. A mean percentage buoyancy of 1.61% indicated that Vomeridens is nearly neutrally buoyant. Inferences from measurements of buoyancy and from morphological data suggest that Vomeridens lives in an epibenthic water column habitat at 400–900 m. Facilitated by its reduced body density, Vomeridens are likely to forage in the water column by hovering above the substrate. The stomach contents consisted of krill (Euphausia superba), some as large as 46–50 mm.The absolute and relative fecundity in seven female was 1576–2296 oocytes (mean 1889) and 21.3–28.9 oocytes g-1 body weight (mean 25.3), respectively. The reproductive effort in terms of egg diameter, GSI, and absolute and relative fecundity is similar to that for other bathydraconids.

Keywords

bone and cartilage histologybuoyancydietmeristicsreproductionsomatic lipidvomerine teeth
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 18 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albertson, R.C., Yan, Y.-L., Titus, T.A., Pisano, E., Vacchi, M., Yelick, P.C., IIIDetrich, H.W. Postlethwait, J.H. 2010. Molecular pedomorphism underlies craniofacial skeletal evolution in Antarctic notothenioid fishes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10, 10.1186/1471-2148-10-4.Google Scholar
Balushkin, A.V. 1984. Morphological bases of the systematics and phylogeny of the nototheniid fishes. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Zoological Institute, Leningrad, 140 pp. [In Russian; English translation available as Russian Translation Series No. 1973, 1990, from A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.]Google Scholar
Balushkin, A.V. Voskoboinikova, O.S. 1995. Systematics and phylogeny of Antarctic dragonfishes (Bathydraconidae, Notothenioidei, Perciformes). Journal of Ichthyology, 35, 89–104.Google Scholar
Bargelloni, L., Ritchie, P.A., Patarnello, T., Battaglia, B., Lambert, D.M. Meyer, A. 1994. Molecular evolution at subzero temperatures: mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies of fishes from Antarctica (suborder Notothenioidei), and the evolution of antifreeze glycopeptides. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 11, 854–863.Google ScholarPubMed
Bornbusch, A.H. Lee, M. 1992. Gill raker structure and development in Indo-Pacific anchovies (Teleostei: Engrauloidea), with a discussion of the structural evolution of engrauloid gill rakers. Journal of Morphology, 214, 109–119.Google Scholar
Derome, N., Chen, W.-J., Dettaï, A., Bonillo, C. Lecointre, G. 2002. Phylogeny of Antarctic dragonfishes (Bathydraconidae, Notothenioidei, Teleostei) and related families based on their anatomy and two mitochondrial genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 24, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeWitt, H.H. 1962. A new Antarctic nototheniid fish with notes on two recently described nototheniiforms. Copeia, 4, 826–833.Google Scholar
DeWitt, H.H. 1964. A revision of the Antarctic genus Racovitzia (Pisces, Bathydraconidae). Copeia, 3, 496–506.Google Scholar
DeWitt, H.H. 1966. A Revision of the Antarctic and Southern genus Notothenia (Pisces, Nototheniidae). PhD thesis, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 469 pp. [Unpublished].Google Scholar
Dewitt, H.H. 1971. Coastal and deep-water benthic fishes of the Antarctic. In Bushnell, V.C., ed. Antarctic Map folio series, folio 15. New York: American Geographical Society, 10 pp.Google Scholar
DeWitt, H.H. Hureau, J.-C. 1979. Fishes collected during “Hero” Cruise 72-2 in the Palmer Archipelago, Antarctica, with the description of two new genera and three new species. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 4e Série, 1, 775–820.Google Scholar
DeWitt, H.H., Heemstra, P.C. Gon, O. 1990. Nototheniidae. In Gon, O. & Heemstra, P.C., eds. Fishes of the Southern Ocean. Grahamstown, South Africa: J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, 279–331.Google Scholar
Duhamel, G., Kock, K.-H., Balguerias, E. Hureau, J.-C. 1993. Reproduction in fish of the Weddell Sea. Polar Biology, 13, 193–200.Google Scholar
Eastman, J.T. 1993. Antarctic fish biology: evolution in a unique environment. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 322 pp.Google Scholar
Eastman, J.T. 1997. Phyletic divergence and specialization for pelagic life in the Antarctic notothenioid fish Pleuragramma antarcticum. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 118A, 1095–1101.Google Scholar
Eastman, J.T. 1999. Aspects of the biology of the icefish Dacodraco hunteri (Notothenioidei, Channichthyidae) in the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 21, 194–196.Google Scholar
Eastman, J.T. 2000. Antarctic notothenioid fishes as subjects for research in evolutionary biology. Antarctic Science, 12, 276–287.Google Scholar
Eastman, J.T. 2005. The nature of the diversity of Antarctic fishes. Polar Biology, 28, 93–107.Google Scholar
Eastman, J.T. Clarke, A. 1998. A comparison of adaptive radiations of Antarctic fish with those of non Antarctic fish. In Di Prisco, G., Pisano, E. & Clarke, A., eds. Fishes of Antarctica: a biological overview. Milan: Springer, 3–26.Google Scholar
Eastman, J.T. DeVries, A.L. 1981. Hepatic ultrastructural specialization in Antarctic fishes. Cell and Tissue Research, 219, 489–496.Google Scholar
Eastman, J.T. DeVries, A.L. 1982. Buoyancy studies of notothenioid fishes in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Copeia, 2, 385–393.Google Scholar
Eastman, J.T. Eakin, R.R. 2000. An updated species list for notothenioid fish (Perciformes; Notothenioidei), with comments on Antarctic species. Archives of Fisheries Marine Research, 48, 11–20.Google Scholar
Eastman, J.T. Hubold, G. 1999. The fish fauna of the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 11, 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastman, J.T. Sidell, B.D. 2002. Measurements of buoyancy for some Antarctic notothenioid fishes from the South Shetland Islands. Polar Biology, 25, 753–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekau, W. 1990. Demersal fish fauna of the Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 2, 129–137.Google Scholar
Ekau, W. 1991. Reproduction in high Antarctic fishes (Notothenioidei). Meeresforschung, 33, 159–167.Google Scholar
Gon, O. 1990. Bathydraconidae. In Gon, O. & Heemstra, P.C., eds. Fishes of the Southern Ocean. Grahamstown, South Africa: J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, 364–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbs, C.L. Lagler, K.F. 2004. Fishes of the Great Lakes Region, revised ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 276 pp.Google Scholar
Iwami, T. 1985. Osteology and relationships of the family Channichthyidae. Memoirs of the National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo, E36, 1–69.Google Scholar
Iwami, T. Abe, T. 1981. The collection of fishes trawled in the Ross Sea. Antarctic Record, No. 71, 130–141.Google Scholar
Iwami, T., Matsuo, A. Numanami, H. 1999. Topography of the cephalic sensory canal system of the family Channichthyidae (Perciformes, Notothenioidei). Polar Biosciences, National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo, No. 12, 26–35.Google Scholar
Jakubowski, M. 1970. Morphological features of the lateral line organs in members of the Antarctic genus Trematomus Boul. (Nototheniidae, Pisces). Journal of Ichthyology, 10, 268–271.Google Scholar
Jakubowski, M. 1971. Morphological features of the lateral-line organs in members of the genus Notothenia Rich. and other genera of the family Nototheniidae (Pisces). Journal of Ichthyology, 11, 493–499.Google Scholar
Kock, K.-H. Kellermann, A. 1991. Reproduction in Antarctic notothenioid fish. Antarctic Science, 3, 125–150.Google Scholar
La Mesa, M., Caputo, V. Eastman, J.T. 2007. Gametogenesis in the dragonfishes Akarotaxis nudiceps and Bathydraco marri (Pisces, Notothenioidei: Bathydraconidae) from the Ross Sea. Antarctic Science, 19, 64–70.Google Scholar
Near, T.J. 2004. Estimating divergence times of notothenioid fishes using a fossil-calibrated molecular clock. Antarctic Science, 16, 37–44.Google Scholar
Near, T.J. Cheng, C.-H.C. 2008. Phylogenetics of notothenioid fishes (Teleostei: Acanthomorpha): inferences from mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 47, 832–840.Google Scholar
Near, T.J., Jones, C.D. Eastman, J.T. 2009. Geographic intraspecific variation in buoyancy within Antarctic notothenioid fishes. Antarctic Science, 21, 123–129.Google Scholar
Near, T.J., Pesavento, J.J. Cheng, C.-H.C. 2004. Phylogenetic investigations of Antarctic notothenioid fishes (Perciformes: Notothenioidei) using complete gene sequences of the mitochondrial encoded 16S rRNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 32, 881–891.Google Scholar
Near, T.J., Kendrick, B.J., IIIDetrich, H.W. Jones, C.D. 2007. Confirmation of neutral buoyancy in Aethotaxis mitopteryx DeWitt (Nototheniodei: Nototheniidae). Polar Biology, 30, 443–447.Google Scholar
Near, T.J., Russo, S.E., Jones, C.D. DeVries, A.L. 2003. Ontogenetic shift in buoyancy and habitat in the Antarctic toothfish, Dissostichus mawsoni (Perciformes: Nototheniidae). Polar Biology, 26, 124–128.Google Scholar
Schwarzbach, W. 1988. Die Fischfauna des östlichen und südlichen Weddellmeeres: geographische Verbreitung, Nahrung und trophische Stellung der Fischarten. Berichte zur Polarforschung, 54, 1–94.Google Scholar
Springer, V.G. Johnson, G.D. 2000. Use and advantages of ethanol solution of alizarin red S dye for staining bone in fishes. Copeia, 1, 300–301.Google Scholar
Taylor, W.R. 1967. An enzyme method of clearing and staining small vertebrates. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 122, 1–17.Google Scholar
Van der Molen, S. Matallanas, J. 2003. Oocyte development and maturity classification of Gerlachea australis from the Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 26, 653–658.Google Scholar
Voskoboinikova, O.S. 1994. Rates of individual development of the bony skeleton of eleven species of the family Nototheniidae. Journal of Ichthyology, 34, 108–120.Google Scholar
Voskoboinikova, O.S. 1997. Osteological development of the Channichthyidae (Teleostei: Notothenioidei). Cybium, 21, 369–379.Google Scholar
Voskoboinikova, O.S. 2001. Evolutionary significance of heterochronies in the development of the bony skeleton in fishes of the suborder Notothenioidei (Perciformes). Journal of Ichthyology, 41, 415–424.Google Scholar
West, G. 1990. Method of assessing ovarian development in fishes: a review. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 41, 199–222.Google Scholar
Witten, P.E., Huysseune, A. Hall, B.K. 2010. A practical approach for the identification of the many cartilaginous tissues in teleost fish. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 26, 257–262.Google Scholar