Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:23:30.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of published scientific research from Deception Island, South Shetland Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2014

Pablo Tejedo ,
Berta Gutiérrez ,
Luis R. Pertierra  and
Javier Benayas
Pablo Tejedo*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin 2, Madrid ES-28049, Spain
Berta Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin 2, Madrid ES-28049, Spain
Luis R. Pertierra
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin 2, Madrid ES-28049, Spain
Javier Benayas
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin 2, Madrid ES-28049, Spain
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a methodology to assess the degree of multidisciplinarity and international co-operation between scientists working on Deception Island, using techniques based on social network analysis. A database was built of the scientific output, as represented by published articles, on Deception Island between 1964–2012. From the 173 published articles, the main topics, the temporal trends, the profile of the principal journals, and the contributions made by each country, research institution and scientist were obtained. The data presented show a significant role played by four of the six nations belonging to the Deception Island Management Group. However, collaborations between researchers in different fields was unusual and co-authoring by researchers from different countries was relatively low. These results show that there is a need to strengthen international co-operation, a highly advisable strategy in Antarctica due to the complexity of logistics and high operational costs. Studies such as this may help to identify synergies between institutions and researchers from different nations, improving the scientific collaboration in this area of priority for conservation and management.

Keywords

ASMA No. 4Deception Island Management Groupinternational scientific collaborationJournal Citation Reportsmultidisciplinary researchsocial network analysis
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 27 , Supplement 2 , April 2015 , pp. 134 - 149
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aksnes, D.W., Hessen, D.O. 2009. The structure and development of polar research (1981–2007): a publication-based approach. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research, 41, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P.E., Mcreath, I., Harvey, M.R., Roobol, M.J. & Davies, T.G. 1975. The geology of the South Shetland Islands: V. Volcanic evolution of Deception Island. British Antarctic Survey Science Reports, 78, 1–80.Google Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A., Linse, K., Enderlein, P., Smale, D., Fraser, K.P.P. & Brown, M. 2008. Marine richness and gradients at Deception Island, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 20, 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartneck, C. & Hu, J. 2010. The fruits of collaboration in a multidisciplinary field. Scientometrics, 85, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benayas, J., Pertierra, L., Tejedo, P., Lara, F., Bermúdez, O., Hughes, K.A. & Quesada, A. 2013. A review of scientific research trends within ASPA 126 Byers Peninsula, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 25, 128–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bó, M.S. & Copello, S. 2001. Distribution and abundance of breeding birds at Deception Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica, February to April 2000. Marine Ornithology, 29, 39–42.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S.P. 2002. NetDraw software for network visualization. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. & Freeman, L.C. 2002. UCINET for Windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Dastidar, P.G. 2007. National and institutional productivity and collaboration in Antarctic science: an analysis of 25 years of journal publications (1980–2004). Polar Research, 26, 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dastidar, P.G. & Persson, O. 2005. Mapping the global structure of Antarctic research vis-à-vis Antarctic Treaty System. Current Science, 89, 1552–1554.Google Scholar
Deception Island Management Group. 2012. Deception Island management package. Available at: http://www.ats.aq/documents/recatt/Att512_e.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2013.Google Scholar
Dibbern, J.S. 2010. Fur seals, whales and tourists: a commercial history of Deception Island, Antarctica. Polar Record, 46, 210–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downie, R.H., Convey, P., McInnes, S.J. & Pugh, P.J.A. 2000. The non-marine invertebrate fauna of Deception Island (Maritime Antarctic): a baseline for a comprehensive biodiversity database. Polar Record, 36, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fermani, P., Mataloni, G. & van de Vijver, B. 2007. Soil microalgal communities on an Antarctic active volcano (Deception Island, South Shetlands). Polar Biology, 30, 1381–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, K.A., Pertierra, L.R. & Walton, D.W.H. 2013. Area protection in Antarctica: how can conservation and scientific research goals be managed compatibly? Environmental Science & Policy, 31, 120–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, K.A., Fretwell, P., Rae, J., Holmes, K. & Fleming, A. 2011. Untouched Antarctica: mapping a finite and diminishing environmental resource. Antarctic Science, 23, 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAATO (International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators). 2014. Tourism statistics. Available at: http://iaato.org/tourism-statistics. Accessed 24 April 2014.Google Scholar
Jabour, J. 2009. National Antarctic programs and their impact on the environment. In Kerry, K.R. & Riddle, M., eds. Health of Antarctic wildlife: a challenge for science and policy. Berlin: Springer, 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naveen, R., Lynch, H.J., Forrest, S., Mueller, T. & Polito, M. 2012. First direct, site-wide penguin survey at Deception Island, Antarctica, suggests significant declines in breeding chinstrap penguins. Polar Biology, 35, 1879–1888.Google Scholar
Pertierra, L.R. & Hughes, K.A. 2013. Management of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas: permitting, visitation and information exchange practices. Antarctic Science, 25, 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pertierra, L.R., Tejedo, P. & Benayas, J. 2014. Historical developments, drivers of change, and future scenarios for human activities on Deception Island. In Tin, T., Ligget, D., Maher, P. & Lamers, M., eds. Antarctic futures: human engagement with the Antarctic environment. Dordrecht: Springer, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smellie, J.L., López-Martínez, J., Headland, R.K., Hernández-Cifuentes, F., Maestro, A., Millar, I.L., Rey, J., Serrano, E., Somoza, L. & Thomson, J.W. 2002. Geology and geomorphology of Deception Island. BAS Geomap Series, Sheets 6A and 6B. Cambridge: British Antarctic Survey, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, R.I.L. 1984a. Colonization and recovery by cryptogams following recent volcanic activity on Deception Island, South Shetland Islands. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, No. 62, 25–51.Google Scholar
Smith, R.I.L. 1984b. Colonization by bryophytes following recent volcanic activity on an Antarctic Island. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 56, 53–63.Google Scholar
Smith, R.I.L. 1988. Botanical survey of Deception Island. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, No. 80, 129–136.Google Scholar
Smith, R.I.L. 2005. The thermophilic bryoflora of Deception Island: unique plant communities as a criterion for designating an Antarctic Specially Protected Area. Antarctic Science, 17, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spain. 2010. Revisión del ASMA No. 4 Isla Decepción. Bibliografía científica española. Information Paper 115. Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting XXXIII, Punta del Este, Uruguay, 3–14 May 2010.Google Scholar
Stefenon, V.M., Roesch, L.F.W. & Pereira, A.B. 2013. Thirty years of Brazilian research in Antarctica: ups, downs and perspectives. Scientometrics, 95, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerson, R. & Tin, T. 2011. Protection of the wilderness and aesthetic values of Antarctica: geographical information systems (GIS) as a tool. In Watson, A., Murrieta-Saldivar, J. & McBride, B., eds. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values. Ninth World Wilderness Congress Symposium, Meridá, Mexico, 6–13 November 2009. Proceedings RMRS-P-64. Fort Collins: Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 178–181.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Tejedo Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Tejedo Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 95.9 KB