Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:53:49.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An iridovirus from the Antarctic seaspider Pentanymphon antarcticum (Pycnogonida)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Jamie Bojko*
Affiliation:
National Horizons Centre, Teesside University, Darlington, UK School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
Jamie M. Maxwell
Affiliation:
School of Natural Sciences and the Ryan Institute, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
Amy L. Burgess
Affiliation:
National Horizons Centre, Teesside University, Darlington, UK School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
Lance Nicado
Affiliation:
School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
Brian Federici
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
Huw J. Griffiths
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
Louise Allcock
Affiliation:
School of Natural Sciences and the Ryan Institute, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Antarctic seaspider Pentanymphon antarcticum is a benthic species in the Southern Ocean, but little is known about its pathogen profile. In this study, we provide a draft genome for a new iridovirus species that has been identified using metagenomic techniques. The draft genome totals 157 260 bp and encodes 188 protein-coding genes. The virus shows greatest protein similarity to a ‘carnivorous sponge-associated iridovirus’ from a deep-sea sponge host. This study represents the first discovery of a pycnogonid iridovirus and the first iridovirus from the Antarctic region.

Type
Biological Sciences
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antarctic Science Ltd

Seaspiders (Chelicerata: Pycnogonida) are a diverse group of marine invertebrates that inhabit benthic marine ecosystems throughout the world (Arnaud & Bamber Reference Arnaud and Bamber1987). Up to 20% of the ~1400 described pycnogonid species (Bamber et al. Reference Bamber, El Nagar and Arango2023) are found in the Southern Ocean, and ~270 species are endemic (Munilla & Soler-Membrives Reference Munilla and Soler-Membrives2009). Seaspiders consume sponges, cnidarians, molluscs, echinoderms and polychaetes, as well as biofilms and algae (Dietz et al. Reference Dietz, Dömel, Leese, Lehmann and Melzer2018). Several genera have larval forms, which are parasitic (employing endo- and ecto-parasitism) upon hydroids and molluscs (Dietz et al. Reference Dietz, Dömel, Leese, Lehmann and Melzer2018). To date, few parasitic associations have been made with the Pycnogonida, although they have been recorded hosting leeches as well as epifauna (hydroids, bryozoans, arthropods, forams and sponges; Maxwell et al. Reference Maxwell, Gan, Arango, Doemel, Allcock, Van de Putte and Griffiths2022). No viruses are known to occur in these animals.

We present a novel iridovirus (Iridoviridae), a large family of dsDNA viruses typically packaged in an icosahedral capsid within a lipid membrane (Chinchar et al. Reference Chinchar, Hick, Ince, Jancovich, Marschang and Qin2017). The Iridoviridae sit within the nucleo-cytoplasmic large DNA virus (NCLDV) group (Varidnaviria (realm), Bamfordvirae (kingdom), Nucleocytoviricota (phylum), Megaviricetes (class) and Pimascovirales (order)). Two subfamilies (Alphairidovirinae and Betairidovirinae) contain multiple genera (seven in total) housing 22 viral species accepted by the International Committee for the Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV; Chinchar et al. Reference Chinchar, Hick, Ince, Jancovich, Marschang and Qin2017). Iridovirus hosts are found throughout the animal kingdom (reptiles, fish, amphibians, crustaceans, insects and sponges). Our new discovery of an iridovirus from a pycnogonid increases their known host range to seaspiders. The region of this discovery increases their known geography to Antarctica.

Pentanymphon antarcticum Hodgson, 1904, a Southern Ocean endemic pycnogonid, was collected from a depth of 870 m using an Agassiz trawl in the Prince Gustav Channel, east of the Antarctic Peninsula (-63.80603, -58.06523) in March 2018 (research cruise JR17003a, RRS James Clark Ross). Specimens were placed in pre-cooled 96% ethanol and stored at -20°C, before being stored at the British Antarctic Survey (Cambridge) at ambient temperature. Specimens were identified using morphological characters and confirmed via the metagenomic data collected herein, which resulted in a comparable mitochondrial 16S (GenBank accession: OQ748071).

DNA extraction was conducted separately for 10 individuals using a Wizard DNA extraction kit (Promega). A total of 10 μl (50–100 ng/μl) of the resulting DNA template was pooled into a single 100 μl volume. The pooled sample was prepared into a metagenomic library using an Illumina TruSeq DNA PCR-Free library preparation kit. The library was quality-screened using a bioanalyzer, quantified using a QuantiFluor fluorimeter and denatured using NaOH before being diluted to 10 pmol in Illumina HT1 hybridization buffer for paired-end sequencing on an Illumina NovaSeq. The resulting raw read data were trimmed using Trimmomatic v.0.36 (Bolger et al. Reference Bolger, Lohse and Usadel2014) to result in paired files and unpaired files (BioProject: PRJNA954604). The trimmed data were assembled using SPAdes v.3.15.3 (Bankevich et al. Reference Bankevich, Nurk, Antipov, Gurevich, Dvorkin and Kulikov2012; N50: 2551, N75: 1462, L50: 58 485, L75: 123 220). The contiguous sequences were screened for viruses using BlastX (NCBI Viral RefSeq, February 2022). This highlighted 57 contiguous sequences (contigs) that encoded one or more proteins that were Iridoviridae-like. These contigs were annotated in GeneMarkS (Besemer et al. Reference Besemer, Lomsadze and Borodovsky2001) and vetted using BlastP to remove non-viral sequences. One contig was used to develop a diagnostic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) so that the original sample could be identified and sequenced (following the same process above) alone instead of in a pool. The diagnostic PCR (Table I) targeted gene 31 (Supplemental Table 1). Two primers, SSIr-F (5′-CTGTTTTTCAAAATGGAAAAGTGT-3′) and SSIr-R (5′-CAGACTTAATCCTTACGCATC-3′), result in an 891 bp amplicon in positive cases under the following thermal conditions: 94°C (5 min); 30 cycles (94°C (1 min); 52°C (1 min); 72°C (1 min)); 72°C (7 min). The prevalence was 1/10 (10%).

Table I. Reagents and concentrations/volumes necessary for the use of the seaspider iridovirus diagnostic. The polymerase chain reaction experiments were conducted in 50 μl total reaction volumes.

After re-sequencing, the total next-generation sequencing data were reassembled as above, and the contigs were screened as above. The final contig list included 18 iridovirus segments (OQ791181–OQ791198). The sum of the contig lengths totalled 157 260 bp and encoded 188 protein-coding genes, as assessed via GeneMarkS annotation (Fig. 1a & Supplemental Table 1; Besemer et al. Reference Besemer, Lomsadze and Borodovsky2001). BlastP determined that the new iridovirus was most similar overall to a ‘carnivorous sponge-associated iridovirus’ (csaIV; ON887238; Supplemental Table 1; Canuti et al. Reference Canuti, Large, Verhoeven and Dufour2022).

Figure 1. Phylogeny and draft genome architecture for the new iridovirus from the seaspider Pentanymphon antarcticum. a. The coding regions present on the 18 iridovirus genome segments. b. A concatenated phylogeny built using OrthoFinder to determine phylogenomic topology and the position of the new iridovirus. The ‘seaspider iridovirus’ is a strongly supported member of the aquatic cluster. c. A maximum-likelihood DNA polymerase phylogeny from a range of iridoviruses, with both complete and partial genomes, un-collapsed. d. The same DNA polymerase tree with a greater focus on cluster I. The arrow indicates the presence of the new seaspider-infecting isolate. Larger images of c. and d. are available as Supplemental Figs 1 & 2.

A concatenated phylogeny of ‘Group I’ iridoviruses determined that the new isolate clades with csaIV and ‘Cherax quadricarinatus iridovirus’ (CqIV; Fig. 1b; Li et al. Reference Li, Xu and Yang2017). Within this group, we see three main environmental clusters: an ‘aquatic’ cluster with the marine seaspider iridovirus (Pycnogonida host), deep-ocean csaIV (Porifera host) and freshwater CqIV (crustacean host); a ‘semi-aquatic’ group containing semi-aquatic insect iridoviruses (Diptera hosts); and a terrestrial group with an ‘Armadillidium vulgare iridescent virus’ (crustacean host) and several terrestrial insect iridoviruses (Orthoptera hosts; all 100% bootstrap confidence). We compared the DNA polymerase protein sequences from all iridoviruses, resulting in a similar topology (Fig. 1c,d). Overall, the environment appears to be the greatest evolutionary influence in the diversity of the iridoviruses we know of being in Group I.

Despite the incomplete genome, we consider the virus not to be endogenous as the diagnostic PCR did not provide a positive result for all 10 animals. The 18 contigs show little protein similarity to groups outside of the Iridoviridae. The new iridovirus was present at a prevalence of 10% in our dataset, but the true prevalence and impact of the virus on Southern Ocean ecology remain unknown and require further sampling and diagnostic application. The ecological impacts of csaIV and CqIV are also little known. csaIV originates from the deep-ocean Atlantic species Chondrocladia grandis and Cladorhiza oxeata. Canuti et al. (Reference Canuti, Large, Verhoeven and Dufour2022) hypothesized that the virus may infect the sponge's prey, as it closely resembled a member of the Decapodiridovirus. CqIV is from red claw crayfish in Fujian, China (Xu et al. Reference Xu, Wang, Li and Yang2016). Xu et al. (Reference Xu, Wang, Li and Yang2016) confirmed the presence of virions, and in a follow-up study in 2017 (Li et al. Reference Li, Xu and Yang2017), the genome of the virus was sequenced (165 695 bp). This crayfish virus poses a significant risk to crayfish aquaculture.

In conclusion, we present the first genomic data for a pycnogonid iridovirus and the first iridovirus from the Antarctic region. The Iridoviridae can drive host mortality in a variety of species globally (Williams & Barbosa-Solomieu Reference Williams, Barbosa-Solomieu and Chinchar2005), and this new knowledge highlights the vital importance of exploring viral diversity in the Southern Ocean around Antarctica (Breitbart et al. Reference Breitbart, Thompson, Suttle and Sullivan2007). As our seas warm and our climate changes, we must have a strong baseline understanding of both the marine Antarctic ecosystem and Antarctic disease ecology to support our ongoing exploration of the area. Through this discovery, we hope to highlight the potential for virological discovery in Antarctic fauna.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Society for Invertebrate Pathology for their conference, which brought together several interested researchers to conduct this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare none.

Author contributions

JMM, HJG and LA collected the seaspider specimens. JB, ALB and LN conducted the metagenomics, phylogenetics and PCR design. JB and BF developed the discussion around iridoviruses. All authors contributed to the manuscript text.

Supplemental material

A supplemental section including two figures and one table is included in the online version of this publication.

References

Arnaud, F. & Bamber, R.N. 1987. The biology of Pycnogonida. Advances in Marine Biology, 24, 196.Google Scholar
Bamber, R.N., El Nagar, A. & Arango, C.P. 2023. Pycnobase: World Pycnogonida Database. Retrueved frin https://www.marinespecies.org/pycnobase/Google Scholar
Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A.A., Dvorkin, M., Kulikov, A.S., et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. Journal of Computational Biology, 19, 455477.10.1089/cmb.2012.0021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besemer, J., Lomsadze, A. & Borodovsky, M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Research, 29, 26072618.10.1093/nar/29.12.2607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolger, A.M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 30, 21142120.10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breitbart, M.Y.A., Thompson, L.R., Suttle, C.A. & Sullivan, M.B. 2007. Exploring the vast diversity of marine viruses. Oceanography, 20, 135139.10.5670/oceanog.2007.58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canuti, M., Large, G., Verhoeven, J.T. & Dufour, S.C. 2022. A novel iridovirus discovered in deep-sea carnivorous sponges. Viruses, 14, 1595.10.3390/v14081595CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chinchar, V.G., Hick, P., Ince, I.A., Jancovich, J.K., Marschang, R., Qin, Q., et al. 2017. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Iridoviridae. Journal of General Virology, 98, 890891.10.1099/jgv.0.000818CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietz, L., Dömel, J.S., Leese, F., Lehmann, T. & Melzer, R.R. 2018. Feeding ecology in sea spiders (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida): what do we know?. Frontiers in Zoology, 15, 7.10.1186/s12983-018-0250-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, F., Xu, L. & Yang, F. 2017. Genomic characterization of a novel iridovirus from redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus: evidence for a new genus within the family Iridoviridae. Journal of General Virology, 98, 25892595.10.1099/jgv.0.000904CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, J., Gan, Y.M., Arango, C., Doemel, J.S., Allcock, A.L., Van de Putte, A. & Griffiths, H.J. 2022. Sea spiders (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) from ten recent research expeditions to the Antarctic Peninsula, Scotia Arc and Weddell Sea. Biodiversity Data Journal, 10, e79353.10.3897/BDJ.10.e79353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munilla, T. & Soler-Membrives, A. 2009. Checklist of the pycnogonids from Antarctic and Subantarctic. Antarctic Science, 21, 99111.10.1017/S095410200800151XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T., Barbosa-Solomieu, V. & Chinchar, V.G. 2005. A decade of advances in iridovirus research. Advances in Virus Research, 65, 173248.10.1016/S0065-3527(05)65006-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, L., Wang, T., Li, F. & Yang, F. 2016. Isolation and preliminary characterization of a new pathogenic iridovirus from redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 120, 1726.10.3354/dao03007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table I. Reagents and concentrations/volumes necessary for the use of the seaspider iridovirus diagnostic. The polymerase chain reaction experiments were conducted in 50 μl total reaction volumes.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Phylogeny and draft genome architecture for the new iridovirus from the seaspider Pentanymphon antarcticum. a. The coding regions present on the 18 iridovirus genome segments. b. A concatenated phylogeny built using OrthoFinder to determine phylogenomic topology and the position of the new iridovirus. The ‘seaspider iridovirus’ is a strongly supported member of the aquatic cluster. c. A maximum-likelihood DNA polymerase phylogeny from a range of iridoviruses, with both complete and partial genomes, un-collapsed. d. The same DNA polymerase tree with a greater focus on cluster I. The arrow indicates the presence of the new seaspider-infecting isolate. Larger images of c. and d. are available as Supplemental Figs 1 & 2.

Supplementary material: File

Bojko et al. supplementary material 1

Bojko et al. supplementary material
Download Bojko et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 439.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bojko et al. supplementary material 2

Bojko et al. supplementary material
Download Bojko et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 353.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bojko et al. supplementary material 3

Bojko et al. supplementary material
Download Bojko et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 51.8 KB