Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:51:55.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shape and size of Antarctic icebergs derived from ship observation data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2011

Yuri A. Romanov ,
Nina A. Romanova  and
Peter Romanov
Yuri A. Romanov*
Affiliation:
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, 36 Nahimovski Prospect, Moscow, Russia, 117997
Nina A. Romanova
Affiliation:
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, 36 Nahimovski Prospect, Moscow, Russia, 117997
Peter Romanov
Affiliation:
City College of City University of New York, 160 Convent Ave, New York, NY 10031, USA
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have examined information on the shape and size of Antarctic icebergs as derived from the ship data archive of Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute. The data in the archive cover the period from 1957–2009. For each of five major iceberg shapes we have established their relative frequency of occurrence in the Southern Ocean and the frequency distribution of the iceberg length and freeboard. Weathered and tabular icebergs were observed most often and comprised 66.9% and 22.6% of all reported icebergs respectively. Sloping, pinnacle, and dome icebergs represented correspondingly only 5.6%, 3.2% and 1.7% of the total number of icebergs observed. A distinct maximum was found in frequency distributions of the iceberg length and freeboard for all iceberg shapes. The most frequently observed iceberg lengths (modal length) ranged from 100–200 m for weathered and pinnacled icebergs to 400–600 m for tabular and dome-shaped iceberg. The modal freeboard of icebergs changed from 30–40 m for tabular and weathered icebergs to 50–60 m for domed, pinnacle and sloping icebergs. To calculate the overall mean size parameters of Antarctic icebergs we totalled corresponding mean values for each iceberg shape weighted by the frequency of occurrence of icebergs of each shape. The mean iceberg length and the standard deviation obtained within this approach were correspondingly 381 m and 349 m. The mean iceberg freeboard was equal to 41.2 m with a standard deviation of 12.1 m.

Keywords

dome-shapedpinnacleSouthern Oceantabularweathered
Type
Earth Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , 06 February 2012 , pp. 77 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allaire, P.E. 1972. Stability of simply shaped icebergs. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 11, 10.2118/72-04-02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, D.W. 1980. Stability of icebergs. Annals of Glaciology, 1, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigg, G.R., Wadley, M.R., Stevens, D.P.Johnson, J.A. 1997. Modelling the dynamics and thermodynamics of icebergs. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 26, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borodachev, V.E., Gavrilo, V.P.Kazanskii, M.M. 1994. Slovar’ morskih ledovyh terminov. St Petersburg: Hydrometeoizdat, 126 pp. [Sea ice terms glossary.]Google Scholar
Buinitsky, V.H. 1973. Morskie l'dy i aisbergi Antarktiki. Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, 255 pp. [Sea ice and icebergs of Antarctic.]Google Scholar
Dmitrash, Z.A. 1973. O gorizontal'nyh razmerah antarkticheskih aisbergov po dannym aerofotos'emki. Informazionnyi Bulleten' Sovetskoi Antarkticheskoi Expedizii, 86, 40–41. [Horizontal dimensions of Antarctic icebergs according to aerial photo-survey data.]Google Scholar
Dowdeswell, J.A., Whittington, R.J.Hodgkins, R. 1992. The sizes, frequencies, and freeboards of East Greenland icebergs observed using ship radar and sextant. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, 3515–3528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordienko, P.A. 1960. Rol’ aisbergov v ledovom i termicheskom balanse pribrejnyh antarkticheskih vod. Problemy Arktiki i Antarktiki, 2, 17–22. [The role of icebergs in the ice and thermal balance of coastal Antarctic waters.]Google Scholar
Hamley, T.C.Budd, W.F. 1986. Antarctic iceberg distribution and dissolution. Journal of Glaciology, 32, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacka, T.H.Giles, A.B. 2007. Antarctic iceberg distribution and dissolution from ship-based observations. Journal of Glaciology, 53, 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, S.S., Helmer, H.H., Doake, C.S.M., Jenkins, A.Frolich, R.M. 1992. Melting of ice shelves and mass balance of Antarctica. Journal of Glaciology, 38, 375–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keys, H.Fowler, D. 1989. Sources and movement of icebergs in the south-west Ross Sea, Antarctica. Annals of Glaciology, 12, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlovskii, A.M., Komarovskii, V.M., Fedyakov, V.E.Shilnikov, V.I. 1996. Morfometricheskie harakteristiki antarkticheskih aisbergov. [Morphometric characteristics of Antarctic icebergs.] In Popov, I.K. & Voevodin, V.A., eds. Aisbergi Mirovogo okeana. St Petersburg: Hydrometeoizdat, 138–141. [Icebergs of global ocean.]Google Scholar
Kubat, I., Sayed, M., Savage, S.B., Carrieres, T.Crocker, G. 2007. An operational iceberg deterioration model. Proceedings of the seventeenth international offshore and polar engineering conference, Lisbon, Portugal, July 1–6, 2007. Cupertino CA, USA: The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 652–657.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, K. 1996. An iceberg drift and decay to compute the ice-rafted debris and iceberg meltwater flux: application to the interglacial North Atlantic. Paleoceanography, 11, 729–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, V.I.Budd, W.F. 1978. The distribution, movement and melt rates of Antarctic icebergs. In Husseiny, A.A., ed. Proceedings of the first international conference on iceberg utilization for freshwater production, Iowa State University, Ames IA, USA, 1977. New York: Pergamon Press, 220–228.Google Scholar
Nazarov, V.S. 1962. Led antarkticheskih vod. Resultaty Mejdunarodnogo Geofisicheskogo goda. AN SSSR. Sovetskii Geofisicheskyi komitet, Okeanologiya, 6, 81 pp. [Ice of the Antarctic waters.]Google Scholar
Nesyba, S. 1980. On the size distribution of Antarctic icebergs. Cold Region Science and Technology, 1, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orheim, O. 1980. Physical characteristics and life expectancy of tabular Antarctic icebergs. Annals of Glaciology, 1, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orheim, O. 1987a. Evolution of under-water sides of ice shelves and icebergs. Annals of Glaciology, 9, 176–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orheim, O. 1987b. Icebergs in the Southern Ocean. Annals of Glaciology, 9, 241–242.Google Scholar
PERD. 1999. Compilation of iceberg shape and geometry data for the Grand Banks region. PERD/CHC Report 20-43 by CANATEC Consultants Ltd, ICL Isometrics Ltd, CORETEC Inc. and Westmar Consultants Ltd. Online at ftp://ftp2.chc.nrc.ca/CRTreports/PERD/Berg_shapes_99.pdf.Google Scholar
PERD. 2000. Techniques for determining the maximum draft of an iceberg. PERD/CHC Report 20-46, Dr G.W. Timco, Canadian Hydraulics Centre. Online at ftp://ftp2.chc.nrc.ca/CRTreports/PERD/Max_draft_00.pdf.Google Scholar
Robe, R.Q. 1976. Height to draft ratios for icebergs. Proceedings of the third international conference on port and oceans engineering under Arctic conditions, Fairbanks, Alaska, 1975, Vol. 1. Fairbanks, Alaska: University of Alaska, Institute of Marine Science, 407–415.Google Scholar
Romanov, A.A. 1973. Rasmery aisbergov v vostochnoi Antarktike. Informazionnyi Bulleten' Sovetskoi Antarkticheskoi Expedizii, 87, 49. [The size of icebergs in East Antarctica.]Google Scholar
Romanov, A.A. 1996. Ice navigation conditions in the Southern Ocean. World Meteorological Organization, Technical Document, No. 783, 199 pp.Google Scholar
Romanov, Y.A., Romanova, N.A.Romanov, P. 2008. Distribution of icebergs in the Atlantic and Indian Ocean sectors of the Antarctic region and its possible links with ENSO. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, 10.1029/2007GL031685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scambos, T., Ross, R., Bauer, R., Yermolin, Y., Skvarca, P., Long, D., Bohlander, J.Haran, T. 2008. Calving and ice-shelf break-up processes investigated by proxy: Antarctic tabular iceberg evolution during northward drift. Journal of Glaciology, 54, 579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwerdtfeger, P. 1979. Review on icebergs and their uses. Cold Region Science and Technology, 1, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabtaie, S.Bentley, C.R. 1982. Tabular icebergs: implications from geophysical studies of ice shelves. Journal of Glaciology, 28, 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shilnikov, V.I. 1960. Opyt podscheta ob'ema aisbergov v Antarktike. Problemy Arktiki i Antarctiki, 6, 27–36. [Counting experience of icebergs volume in Antarctica.]Google Scholar
Shilnikov, V.I. 1963. Nablyudeniya nad morskimi l'dami i aisbergami vo vremya Antarkticheskoi ekspedizii d/e “Lena” (1957), e/s “Kooperaziya” (1957) i d/e “Ob” (1957/58). Trudy Sovetskoi Antarkticheskoi Ekspedizii, 21, 64–81. [Observations of sea ice and icebergs during Antarctic expeditions of RV Lena (1957), RV Kooperatsiya (1957) and RV Ob (1957/58).]Google Scholar
Shilnikov, V.I. 1969. Aisbergi. [Icebergs.] In Tolstikov, Ye. I., ed. Atlas Antarktiki. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 2, 455–465. [Atlas of Antarctica].Google Scholar
Silva, N.A., Bigg, G.R.Nicholls, K.W. 2006. Contribution of giant icebergs to the Southern Ocean freshwater flux. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, 10.1029/2004JC002843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, J., Whitmer, K.Girard-Ardhuin, F. 2008. Iceberg detection in open water by altimeter waveform analysis. Journal Geophysical Research, 113, 10.1029/2007JC004587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viehoff, T.Li, A. 1995. Iceberg observations and estimation of submarine ridges in the western Weddell Sea. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16, 3391–3408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadhams, P. 1988. Winter observations of iceberg frequencies and sizes in the South Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 93, 3583–3590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, W.F.Campbell, W.J. 1973. Icebergs as a freshwater source: an appraisal. Journal of Glaciology, 12, 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, W.F.Mellor, M. 1978. Some elements of iceberg technology. In Husseiny, A.A., ed. Proceedings of the first international conference on iceberg utilization for freshwater production, Iowa State University, Ames IA, USA, 1977. New York: Pergamon Press, 45–98.Google Scholar
WMO. 1970. Sea-ice nomenclature, terminology, codes and illustrated glossary, WMO/OMM/BMO. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization, 145 pp.Google Scholar