Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:09:46.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Production and Consumption of Text*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Ronald Sussex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The inventions of writing and printing constitute the first two revolutions in information recording and transmission. The current development of electronic management of text, somewhat prefigured by Remington and the typewriter, consitutes a third revolution. This article deals with the current state of play in text production and consumption in the specific context of electronic text production and comsumption.

Type
Language and Technology
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 16 , March 1996 , pp. 46 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bateman, J. A. and Hovy, E. H.. 1992. Computerse and text generation: Principles and uses. In Bulter, C. (ed.) Computers and written text. Oxford: Blackwell. 53–74.Google Scholar
Beaugrande, R. A. de 1984. Text Production: Toward a science of composition Norwood, NJ: Ablex Corp.Google Scholar
Benbasat, I. and Todd, P.. 1993. An experimental investigation of interface design alternatives: Icon vs. text and direct manipulation vs. menus. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 38. 369–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, S. A. 1993. The shape of text to come: The texture of print on screens. College Composition and Communication. 44. 141–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bes, G. G. and Guillotin, T. (eds.) 1992. A natural language and graphics interface: Results and perspectives from the ACORD project. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Reppen, R.. 1994. Corpus based approaches to issues in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics. 15. 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, A. W., Finemann, L. and Heidlage, J. F.. 1992. A voice- and touch driven natural language editor and its performance. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 37. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolter, J. D. 1991. Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Britton, B. K. and Glynn, S. M.. 1989. Computer writing environments: Theory, research and design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brock, M. N. 1992. Customizing a computerized text analyzer for ESL writers: Cost versus gain. CALICO Journal. 8. 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, R. A. 1992. Textbase technology: Writing with reusable text. In Holt, P. O. and Williams, N. (eds.) Computers and writing: State of the art. Oxford: Intellect. 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnard, L. 1992. Tools and techniques for computer-assisted text processing. In Butler, C. (ed.) Computers and written texts. Oxford: Blackwell. 1–28.Google Scholar
Burrows, J. F. 1987. Computation into criticism: A study of Jane Austen's novels and an experiment in method. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burrows, J. F. 1992. Computers and the study of literature. In Butler, C. (ed.) Computers and written texts. Oxford: Blackwell. 167–204.Google Scholar
Bush, V. 1945. As we may think. Atlantic Monthly. 176 (07). 101–108.Google Scholar
Clancey, W. J. 1987. Knowledge-based tutoring: The GUIDON program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Daiute, . 1985a. Computers and writing. Reading, MA: Addision Wesley.Google Scholar
Daiute, . 1985b. Issues in computers to socialize the writing process. Educational Technology and Communication Journal 33. 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, R. 1990. A rule-based approach to computer-assisted copy-editing. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal 2.59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Directory of Electronic Jouornals, Newsletters, and Academic Discussuion Lists. 1991-Present. Washington, DC: Office of Scientific and Academic Publishing, Association of Research Libraries.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. Y. 1992. In there a reader in this labyrinth? Notes on reading Afternoon. In Holt, P. O. and Williams, N. (eds.) Computers and writing: State of the art. Oxford: Intellect. 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, L. S. and Hayes, J. R.. 1980. The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In Gregg, L. W. and Steinberg, E. (eds.) Cognitive Processing in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 31–50.Google Scholar
Fluegelman, A. and Hewes, J. J.. 1983. Writing in the computer age: Word Processing skills and style for every writer. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gringric, P. S. 1983. The UNIX writer's Workbench software: Results of field study. Bell System Technical Journal. 62. 1909–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, C. 1988. How the writing medium shapes the writing process: Effects of word Processing on Planning. Washington, DC: U. S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center. [CECE technical report; no. 6.]Google Scholar
Hass, S. W. 1994. Quotations in scholarly text: Converting existing documents to hypertext. Computers in the Humanities. 28. 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnad, S. 1990a. On the scholarly and educational potential of multiple email networks. COMMED Mailing List []Google Scholar
Harnad, S. 1990b. Scholarly skywriting and the prepublication continuum of scientific inquiry. Phychological Science. 1. 342–344. [Available by anonymous ftp on host princeton. edu in directory /pub/harnad/Harnad as file harnad 90. skywriting]Google Scholar
Harnad, S. 1991. Post-Gutenberg galaxy: The fourth revolution in the means of production of knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review. 2. 1. 39–53. [Available on the PACS-L mailing list archive with the message GET HARNAD PRV2N1 F=MAIL]. [Available by anonymous ftp on host princeton. edu in directory /pub/harnad/Harnad as file harnad91.Postgutenberg]Google Scholar
Harnad, S. 1992 Interactive Publication: Extending the American Physical Society's Discipline-specific model for electronic publishing. Serials Review, Special issues on Economics Models for Electronic Publishing 58–61. [Also available by anonymous ftp on host princeton. edu in directory/pub/harnad/Harnad as file harnad92.interactivpub]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnad, S. 1993a. Commentary and response to Frank Quinn, “Roadkill on the electronic highway? The threat to the mathematical literature”, submitted on the Notices of the American Mathematical Society and distributed on MATH.AMS.ORG on 15 11, 1993. [The paper, with Harnad's commentary, appeared on the mailing list VPIEJ-L on 22 11, 1992.]Google Scholar
Harnad, S. 1993b. Implementing peer review on the Net: Scientific quality control in sholarly electronic journals. Proceedings of the International Conference on Refereed Electronic Journals: Towards a Consortium for Networked Publications. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, 1–2 10 1993. [Available by anonymous ftp on host princeton.edu in directory/pub/harnad/Harnad as file harnad94.peer.review]Google Scholar
Hartley, J. 1991. Psychology, writing and computers: A review of research. Visible Language 25. 339–375.Google Scholar
Hartley, J. (ed.) 1992. Technology and writing. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Hartley, J. 1993. Writing, thinking and computers. British Journal of Educational Technology. 24. 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, M. 1987. Electric language: A philosophical study of word processing. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Horney, Mark. 1993. A measure of hypertext linearity. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 2. 67–82.Google Scholar
Howell, G. and Douglas, J. Y.. 1992. The evolution of interactive fiction. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal. 2. 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaynes, J. T. 1989. Limited freedom: Linear reflections on nonlinear texts. In Barrett, E. (ed.) The society of text. Hypertext, hypermedia, and the social consturction of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 148–161.Google Scholar
Jennings, E. M. 1990. Paperless writing revisted. Computers in the Humanities. 24. 43–48.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 1991. Text and context: Document storage and processing. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahrel, P. 1992. Working with foreign languages and characters in Word Perfect 5.1 and WordPerfect for Windows. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kaplan, N. and Moulthrop, S.. 1993. Seeing through the interface: Computers and the future of composition. In Landow, G. P. and Delany, P. (eds.) The digital word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 253–270.Google Scholar
Karl, L. R., Peter, M. and Shneiderman, B.. 1993. Speech versus mouse commands for word-processing: An empiricia; evaluation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 39. 667–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P.. 1989. Theory, research and pedagogy in ESL writing. In Candlin, C. N. and McNamara, T. F. (eds.) Language, learning and community. Fetschrift in honour of Terry Quinn. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University. 77–90.Google Scholar
korycinski, C. and Newell, A. F.. 1992. Text indexing: The problem of significance. Holt, P. O. and Williams, N. (eds.) Computers and writing: State of the art. Oxford: Intellect. 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Bateman, J. A.. 1991. Text generation and systemic-functional linguistics: Experiences from English and Japanese. London. Printer.Google Scholar
McAleese, R. and Green, C. (eds.) 1990. Hypertext: State of the art. Oxford: Intellect.Google Scholar
McGowan, S. 1992. Ruskin to McRuskin: Degrees of interation. In Holt, P. O. and Williams, N. (eds.) Computers and writing: State of the art. Oxford: Intellect. 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MeTear, M. 1987. The articulate computer. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Neilson, I. and Lee, J. 1994. Conversations with graphics: Implications for the design of natural language/graphics interfaces. International Journal for Human-Computer Studies. 40. 509–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. 1987. Computer lib/dream machines Revised ed. Redmond, WA: Tempus Books of Microsoft Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. H. 1987. Literary machines: The report on, and of, Project Xanadu concerning word processing, electronic publishing, hypertext, thinkertoys, tomorrow's intellectual revolution, and certain other topics including…. Swarthmore, PA: Theodor H. Nelson.Google Scholar
Neuwirth, C. M., Kaufer, D. S.Chimera, R. and Gillespie, T.. 1987. The Notes Program: A hypertext application for writing from source texts. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University, Center for Eduation Computing in English. [CECE Technical Report#1.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuwirth, C. M.Kaufer, D. S.keim, G. and Gillespie, T.. 1988. The Comments Program: Computer support for response to writing. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University, Center for Educational Computing in English. [CECE Technical Report #3.]Google Scholar
O'Brien, S. M. 1993. Knowledge-based systems in speech recongnition: A survey. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 3.71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, W. 1992. Computers and textual editing. In Butler, C. (ed.) Computers and written texts. Oxford: Blackwell. 205–226.Google Scholar
Paris, C. L. 1993. User modeling in the text generation. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Pennington, M. In Press. The Computer and the non-native writer: A natural partnership. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Piolat, A. 1991. Effects of word processing on text revision. Language and Education. 5. 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Q. 1994. Universal Word for Windows. Language International. 6.8–10.Google Scholar
Rooks, D. 1993. The virtual library: Pitfalls, promises, and Potential. The Publis Access Computer Systems Review. 4. 5. 22–29. [Available on the PACS-L mailing list archive with the message GET ROOKS PRV4N5 F=MAIL]Google Scholar
Ross, D. and Hunter, D. 1994. m-Eyeball: An interactive system for producing stylstic descriptions and comparisons. Computers in the Humanities. 28. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubens, P. 1989. On information, hypermedia, and the idea of literacy. In Barrett, C. (ed.) The Society of text. Hypertext, hypermedia, and the social construction of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 3–21.Google Scholar
Sabourin, C. 1994a. Computational text generation: Generation from data or linguistic structure text planning—sentence generation, explanation generation: Bibliography. Montreal: Infolingua.Google Scholar
Sabourin, C. 1994b. Computional lexicology and lexicography: Dictionaries, thesauri, term banks analysis, transfer and generation dictionaries, machine readable dictionaries, lexical semantics, lexicon grammars: Bibliography. Montreal: Infolingua.Google Scholar
Sabourin, C. 1994c. Computer mediated communication: Computer conferencing, electronic mail, electronic publishing, computer interviewing, intractive text reading, group decision support systems, ideas generation support systems, human-machine communication, multimedia communication, hypertext, hypermedia, linguistic games: Bibliography. Montreal: Infolingua.Google Scholar
Salton, G. 1989. Automatic text Processing: The transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. 1982. Representing meaning: An artificial intelligence perspective. In Allén, S. (ed.) Text Proccessing: Text analysis and generation: Text typology and attribution: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 51. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell. 25–63.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P. 1977. Scripts, Plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Seibert, M. 1994. Talking word Processing and word prediction: Increasing writing and communication opportunities for persons with disabilities. Hearsay. 9. 36–38.Google Scholar
Sharples, M. (ed.) 1993. Computer supported collaborative writing. London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, M.Goodlet, J. and Pemberton, L.. 1989. Developing a Writer's Assistant. In Williams, N. and Holt, P. O. (eds.) Computers and writing: Models and tools. Oxford: Intellect. 22–37.Google Scholar
Sharples, M. and Pemberton, L.. 1990. Starting from the writer: Guidelines for the design of user-centred document processors. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal. 2. 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, V. 1994. Netiquette. San Francisco, CA: Albion Books.Google Scholar
Smith, P. D. 1990. An introduction to text Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stix, G. 1994. The speed of write. Scientific American. 271. 6. 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storyspace. 1993. Software reviewed In Computers and the Humanities 27. 137–141.Google Scholar
Sussex, R. 1994. TESL-EJ: Conception and potential of an electornic journal. TESL-EJ. 1. 1. A1: 1–60.Google Scholar
Sussex, R. and White, P.. 1966. Electronic networking in applied linguistics. In Grabe, W. et al. (eds.) Annual Review of applied linguistics, 16. Technologizing the word. New York: Cambridge University Press. 199–224.Google Scholar
Thimbleby, H. 1992. An authour's cross-referencer. In Holt, P. O. and Williams, N. (eds.) Computers and writing: State of the art. Oxford: Intellect. 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, S. R. 1994. The creative Process: A computer model of storytelling and creativity. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van Haalen, T. and Bright, G. W.. 1993. Writing and revising by bilingual students in traditional and word processing environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 9. 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Heuven, V. J. and Pols, L. C. W. (eds.) 1993. Analysis and synthesis of speech: Strategic research towards high-quality text-to-speech generation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virbel, J. 1993. Reading and managing texts on the Bibliothéque de France station. In Landow, G. and Delany, P. (eds.) The digital word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 31–52.Google Scholar
Watts, W. 1992. The brave new world to desktop publishing. Computers in the Humanities 26. 457–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayner, P. 1992. Boxweb: A sturctured outline program for writers. In Holt, P. O. and Williams, N. (eds.) Computers and writing: State of the art. Oxford: Intellect. 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weizenbaum, J. 1966. Eliza—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM. 9. 1. 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, N. 1990. Writer's problems and computer solutions. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal. 2. 2–25.Google Scholar
Williams, N. 1992a. Computers and writing. In Butler, C. (ed.) Computers and written texts. Oxford: Blackwell. 247–265.Google Scholar
Williams, N. 1992b. The computer, the writer and the learner. London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Williams, N. 1992c. New technology. New writing. New Problems? In Holt, P. O. and Williams, N. (eds.) Computers and writing: State of the art. Oxford: Intellect. 1–19.Google Scholar
Winograd, T. and Flores, F.. 1986. Understanding computers and cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Zellermayer, M., Salomon, G., Globerson, G. and Givon, H. 1991. Enhanced writing related matacognitions through a computerized writing partner. American Educational Research Journal. 28. 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar