Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T22:39:07.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Languages-in-Education in the Philippines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Casilda E. Luzares
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although language differences may exist within a nation, these differences do not become issues of national concern until the government passes legislation to choose one language over others for the purpose of unifying the nation under one linguistic symbol.

The greater bulk of the task of implementing language policies is assigned to the schools for several reasons. First, the schools are one of the most potent instruments for developing and propagating a language. Second, the government has control over the schools. Third, the students are the most teachable segments of the population. Fourth, education is a verbal task; therefore, in order to carry out the education function, the schools have to take an active interest in language.

Type
Language-in-Education Policy
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 2 , March 1981 , pp. 122 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

[Article without byline.] 1981. Strengthening of English in schools. Bulletin today. (09 4).Google Scholar
[Article without byline.] 1980. Stress English in all schools-FM. Bulletin today. (12. 3).Google Scholar
Elkins, R. E. 1977. Bilingualism and the vernacular among linguistic minorities. In Pascasio, E. M. (ed.) The Filipino bilingual: Studies on philippine bilingualism and bilingual education. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press. 98–101.Google Scholar
Galang, R. G. 1977. The vernacular in the classroom. In Pascasio, E. M. (ed.) The Filiopino bilingual: Studies on Philippine bilingualism and bilingual education. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press. 102–107.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. B., FSC. 1979a. Evaluating the progress of bilingual education. PSSC social science information. 01–03.Google Scholar
Gonzelez, A. B., FSC. 1979b. Language and social development in the Pacific Area, Paper presented at the XIVth Pacific Congress, Khabarovsk, USSR.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. B. 1980. Language and nationalism: The Philippine experience thus far. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. B. and Bautista, Ma. Lourders S.. Aspects of language planning and development in the Philippines. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Pascasio, E. M. 1977. The Filipino bilingual: Studies on Philippine bilingualism and bilingual education. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
Soriano, L. 1977. Bilingualism in Philippine education. In Pascasio, E. M. (ed.) The Filipino bilingual: Studies on Philippine bilingualism and bilingual education. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press. 5–8.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1953. The use of vernacular languages in education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Yabes, L. 1981. Language policy and equality of opportunity for advancement. Paper presented at 1981 annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar