Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T14:21:03.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION: TESTS, CURRICULA, AND TEACHING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Alister Cumming
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the past decade, many concerted policy efforts have aimed to change the status and functions of language assessment in school systems or higher education, redefining relationships among language tests, curriculum policies, and classroom teaching practices. Conventionally, formal language tests describe individual proficiency levels in reference to normative standards for purposes of certifying abilities; screening applicants for higher education, employment, or immigration decisions; or monitoring the results of educational systems. Recently, many curriculum policies have been reconceptualized in reference to attainment or benchmark standards that specify (usually functional, communicative) goals for language education, learners' achievements, and program accountability. These innovations have adopted principles of criterion-referenced rather than norm-referenced assessment, creating new relations (as well as dilemmas) between language assessment and new curriculum policies, highlighting the nature of language assessment practices in programs, classrooms, or other learning contexts, particularly the foundation bases for defining language proficiency, alignment between assessments and curricula, the formative purposes of assessment in pedagogy, and the situations and interests of particular learner populations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 29 , March 2009 , pp. 90 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANNOTATED REFERENCES

Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. (Ed.). (2000). Studies in immigrant English language assessment (Vol. 1). Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Brindley, G., & Burrows, C. (Eds.). (2001). Studies in immigrant English language assessment (Vol. 2). Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-referenced language testing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, B. (2000). The development of a common framework scale of language proficiency. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rivera, C., & Collum, E. (Eds.). (2006). State assessment policy and practice for English language learners: A national perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

OTHER REFERENCES

Abedi, J., Hofstetter, C., & Lord, C. (2004). Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research. Review of Educational Research, 74 (1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alabau, I., Bonnet, G., de Bot, K., Bramsbye, J., Dauphin, L, Erickson, G., et al. . (2002). The assessment of pupils’ skills in English in eight European countries. Paris: European Network of Policy Makers for the Evaluation of Education Systems.Google Scholar
Artiles, A. J., & Ortiz, A. A. (Eds.). (2002). English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment, and instruction. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.Google Scholar
Bailey, A., & Butler, F. (2004). Ethical considerations in the assessment of the language and content knowledge of U.S. school-age learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1 (2&3), 177–193.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13 (2), 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, M., Hird, B., Milton, M., Oliver, R., & Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: Teachers’ principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22 (4), 470–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G. (1998). Outcomes-based assessment and reporting in language learning programmes: A review of the issues. Language Testing, 15 (1), 45–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H. (Ed.). (2007). Perspectives. Modern Language Journal, 91 (4), 641–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, F., & Stevens, R. (2001). Standardized assessment of the content knowledge of English language learners K–12: Current trends and old dilemmas. Language Testing, 18, 409–427.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (Ed.). (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3 (3), 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, L., Klinger, D., & Zheng, Y. (2007). The challenges of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test for second language students. Language Testing, 24 (2), 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y., & Curtis, A. (Eds.). (2004). Washback in language testing: Research, contexts, and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cizek, B. (Ed.). (2001). Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Colby-Kelly, C., & Turner, C. (2007). AFL research in the L2 classroom and evidence of usefulness: Taking formative assessment to the next level. In Cumming, A. & Laurier, M. (Eds.), Language assessment, special issue of Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coniam, D., & Falvey, P. (2007). High-stakes testing and assessment: English language teacher benchmarking. In Cummins, J. & Davison, C. (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching: Part one (pp. 456–471). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cumming, A. (2001a). The difficulty of standards, for example in second language writing. In Silva, T. & Matsuda, P. (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 209–229). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cumming, A. (2001b). ESL/EFL instructors’ practices for writing assessment: Specific or general purposes? Language Testing, 18,(2), 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Davison, C. (2004). The contradictory culture of classroom-based assessment: Teacher assessment practices in senior secondary English. Language Testing, 21 (3), 304–334.Google Scholar
Edelenbos, P., & Kubanek-German, A. (2004). Teacher assessment: The concept of “diagnostic competence.” Language Testing, 21 (2), 259–283.Google Scholar
Ekbatani, G., & Pierson, H. (Eds.) (2000). Learner-directed assessment in ESL. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Elder, C., & Davies, A. (2006). Assessing English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 282–301.Google Scholar
Epp, L., Stawychny, M., Bonham, A., & Cumming, A. (2002). Benchmarking the English language demands of the nursing profession across Canada. Winnipeg: Red River Community College. Report submitted to the Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks. Retrieved February 18, 2009, from http://www.language.ca.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, S. (2008). Transforming talk and phonics practice: Or, how do crabs clap? TESOL Quarterly, 42 (2), 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, G., McKoon, G., & August, D. (2006). Language and literacy assessment of language-minority students. In August, D. & Shanahan, T. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-minority Children and Youth (pp. 597–624). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gipps, C., & Cumming, J. J. (2005). Assessing literacies. In Bascia, N., Cumming, A., Datnow, A., Leithwood, K., & Livingstone, D. (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy (Vol. 2, pp. 695–713). Dordrecht, Netherlands. Springer.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. (2005). Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Grierson, J. (1995). Classroom-based assessment in Intensive English Centres. In Brindley, G. (Ed.), Language assessment in action (pp. 195–236). Macquarie University: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Australia.Google Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L. (2007). The impact of testing practices on teaching: Ideologies and alternatives. In Cummins, J. & Davison, C. (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching: Part one (pp. 487–504). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Harper, C., Platt, E., Naranjo, C., & Boynton, S. (2007). Marching in unison: Florida ESL teachers and No Child Left Behind. TESOL Quarterly, 41 (3), 642–651.Google Scholar
Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing tests control learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Huhta, A., Kalaja, P., & Pitkanen-Huhta, A. (2006). The discursive construction of a high-stakes test: The many faces of a test-taker. Language Testing, 23 (3), 326–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39 (2), 83–101.Google Scholar
Johns, A. (1991). Interpreting an English competency exam: The frustrations of an ESL science student. Written Communication, 8 (3), 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, R. (2000). Context-sensitive assessment of modern languages in primary (elementary) and early secondary education: Scotland and the European experience. Language Testing, 17 (2), 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J., & Poehner, M. (2008). Dynamic assessment. In Shohamy, E. (Vol. Ed.) & Hornberger, N. (Series Ed.), Language testing and assessment: Vol. 7. Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., pp. 273–284). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Leung, C. (2007). Dynamic assessment: Assessment for and as teaching. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4 (3), 257–278.Google Scholar
Leung, C., & Lewkowicz, J. (2006). Expanding horizons and unresolved conundrums: Language testing and assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 40 (1), 211–234.Google Scholar
Leung, C., & Mohan, B. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing, 21 (3), 335–359.Google Scholar
Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessment and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29 (2), 4–16.Google Scholar
Little, D. (2005). The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio: Involving learners and their judgements in the assessment process. Language Testing, 22 (3), 321–336.Google Scholar
Lynch, B., & Davidson, F. (1994). Criterion-reference test development: Linking curricula, teachers, and tests. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (4), 727–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, P. (2005). Assessing young language learners. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, P. (2007). The standards movement and ELT for school-aged learners: Cross national perspectives. In Cummins, J. & Davison, C. (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching: Part one (pp. 439–456). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, P., Coppari, P., Cumming, A., Graves, K., Lopriore, L., & Short, D. (2001). Language standards: An international perspective. Parts 1 & 2. TESOL Matters, 11 (2), 1–4(3), 11, 15.Google Scholar
McNamara, T., & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moore, H. (2005). Telling what is real: Competing views in assessing ESL development. Linguistics and Education, 8 (2), 189–228.Google Scholar
Murray, D. (Ed.). (2008). Planning change, changing plans: Innovations in second language teaching. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, D. (2007). Standards-based approaches to the evaluation of ESL instruction. In Cummins, J. & Davison, C. (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching: Part one (pp. 421–438). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
O'Neil, T., Buckendahl, C., Plake, B., & Taylor, L. (2007). Recommending a nursing-specific passing standard for the IELTS examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4 (4), 295–317.Google Scholar
Poehner, M., & Lantolf, J. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9 (3), 233–265.Google Scholar
Purpura, J. (2008). Assessing communicative language ability: Models and their components. In Shohamy, E. (Vol. Ed.) & Hornberger, N. (Series Ed.), Language testing and assessment: Vol. 7. Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., pp. 53–68). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18 (4), 429–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea-Dickins, P. (2007). Classroom-based assessment: Possibilities and pitfalls. In Cummins, J. & Davison, C. (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching: Part one (pp. 505–520). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 15 (1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, C. (2007). A new washback model of students’ learning. In Cumming, A. & Laurier, M. (Eds.), Language assessment, special issue of Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 133–160.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2007). The power of language tests, the power of the English language and the role of ELT. In Cummins, J. & Davison, C. (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching: Part one (pp. 521–531). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, D., Gomez, E., Cloud, N., Katz, A., Gottlieb, M., & Malone, M. (2000). Training others to use the ESL standards: A professional development manual. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
Slayter, H. (2003). Responding to change in English language assessment. Prospect, 18 (1), 42–52.Google Scholar
Solano-Flores, G. (2008). Who is given tests in what language by whom, when, and where? The need for probabilities views of language in the testing of English language learners. Educational Researcher, 37 (4), 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solano-Flores, G., & Trumbull, E. (2003). Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educational Researcher, 32 (2), 3–13.Google Scholar
Stansfield, C. (2003). Test translation and adaptation in public education in the USA. Language Testing, 20 (2), 188–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL). (1998). Managing the assessment process: A framework for measuring student attainment of the ESL standards. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL). (2001). Scenarios for ESL standards-based assessment. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
Trim, J. (1998). European perspectives on modern language learning: Contributions to the Modern Languages Project of the Council of Europe. Language Teaching, 31 (2), 206–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wall, D. (2000). The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: Can this be predicted or controlled? System, 28 (4), 499–509.Google Scholar
Wall, D., & Horak, T. (2006). The impact of changes in the TOEFL examination on teaching and learning in central and eastern Europe: Phase 1, the baseline study. TOEFL Monograph MS 34. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved February 18, 2009, from http://www.ets.org/portal/site/etsGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, K. (2003). Language education policy in Japan—The problem of espoused objectives versus practice. Modern Language Journal, 87 (2), 290–292.Google Scholar
Xi, X. (2007). Validating TOEFL iBT speaking and setting score requirements for ITA screening. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4 (4), 318–351.Google Scholar