Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:20:38.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Michael J. Shapiro
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is a variety of ways to explore recent approaches to the language and politics connection, and each problematic suggested vjuld encourage a discussion of different issues and different literatures. The boundary strategies represented by this essay are encouraged by my vocation as a social scientist in general and a political scientist in particular. With respect to the first, I shall be focusing on the implications for social inquiry of different construals of language and meaning. With respect to the second, I shall be “reading” the problem of language within a politically oriented code.

Type
Language and the Professions
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 7 , March 1986 , pp. 74 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Austin, J. L. 1961. A plea for excuses. In Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, M. (eds.) Philosophical papers. London: Oxford University Press. 129–150.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.. 1962. How to do things with words. Ed. Urmson, J. O.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. Discourse in the novel. In Holquist, M. (ed.) The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 259–422.[Tr.Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael.]Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1974. S/Z. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Barthes, R.. 1981. Textual analysis of Poe's “Valdemar”. In Young, R. (ed.) Untying the text. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 133–161.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. 1971. Problems in general linguistics. Miami, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Blonsky, M. 1984. On signs. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1953. Testability and meaning. In Feigl, H. and Brodbeck, M. (eds.) Readings in the philosophy of science. New York: Appleton Century-Crofts. 47–92.Google Scholar
de Man, P. 1983. The rhetoric of blindness: Derrida's reading of Rousseau. In de Man, P.Blindness and insight. 2nd ed. rev. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 102–141.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1976. Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. [Tr. Spivak, G. C..]Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1972. The archeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon. [Tr.Smith, A. M. Sheridan.]Google Scholar
Foucault, M.. 1977a. What is an author. In Bouchard, D. F. (ed.) Language, counter-memory, practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 113–138.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.. 1977b. Discipline and punish. New York: Pantheon. [Tr. Smith, A. M. Sheridan.]Google Scholar
Foucault, M.. 1978. The history of sexuality. New York: Pantheon. [Tr. Hurley, R..]Google Scholar
Foucault, M.. 1981. The order of discourse. In Young, R. (ed.) Untying the text. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 48–78. [Tr. McCleod, I..]Google Scholar
Gadamer, H-G. 1977. On the scope and function of hermeneutical reflection. In H-G. Gadamer Philosophical hermeneutics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 18–43. [Tr. Linge, D. E..]Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1931. Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. New York: Humanities Press. [Tr. Gibson, W. R.Boyce.]Google Scholar
Husserl, E.. 1970. Logical investigations. New York: Humanities Press. [Tr. Findlay, J. N..]Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. 1940. Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American sociological review. 5.904–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, B. 1983. Conrad and imperialism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1973. Verbalizing a political act: Towards a politics of speech. Political theory. 1. 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A. 1962. Phenomenology and the social sciences. In Schutz, A.Collected papers I. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan. [Tr. Anscombe, G. E. M..]Google Scholar