Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:07:03.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concluding Thoughts: Language Planning Issues for the Coming Decade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

G. Richard Tucker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As the review articles commissioned for this volume clearly indicate, the past two years (1992 and 1993) have been particularly rich ones for scholars concerned with language policy and language planning issues. As I reviewed these contributions, I was struck by the salience of five cross-cutting themes which seemed to underpin many of the articles-and indeed much of the current work by the profession. I propose to identify and comment briefly on each of these themes, and then to conclude by alluding to two relatively neglected areas of potential future concern. The five somewhat interrelated themes include: the role(s) of language policy or planning activities in foreshadowing or marking major world (political) events; the growing concern with ethnic revitalization; the correlates and consequences of continuing migration and mobility; the differential perceptions of the role of the mother tongue in primary education; and the potential contributions of language planning to educational and national development.

Type
Summary
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 14 , March 1994 , pp. 277 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Biber, D. and Hared., M. 1991. Literacy in Somali: Linguistic consequences. In Grabe, W. et al. , (eds.) Annual review of applied linguistics, 12. New York: Cambridge University Press. 260–282.Google Scholar
Bull, W. A. 1955. The use of vernacular languages in fundamental education. International Journal of American Linguistics. 21. 288–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. B. and Snow, C. E. (eds.) 1990. English plus: Issues in bilingual education. [Theme issue of The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 508.]Google Scholar
Collier, V. P. 1989. How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. TESOL Quarterly. 23. 3. 509–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, V. P. 1992. A synthesis of studies examining long-term language minority student data on academic achievement. Bilingual Research Journal. 16.1/2.187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. (ed.) 1992a. Language loyalties: A source book on the official English controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Craeford, J. (ed.) 1992b. Hold your tongue: Bilingualism and the politics of “English only.” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Jones, G. M. and Ozog, A. C. K. (eds.) 1993. Bilingualism and national development. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Labrie, N. 1993. La construction linguistique de la communaute europeenne. Paris: Librairie Honore-Champion.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. E. 1980. The two faces of bilingual education. NCBE Forum. 3.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. M. and Taylor, D. M.. 1990. Coping with cultural and racial diversity in urban America. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. 1991. International perspectives of foreign language testing systems and policy. In Ervin, G. (ed.) International perspectives on foreign language teaching. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company. 91–107.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. 1993a. The power of tests: The impact of language tests on teaching and learning. Washington, DC: The National Foreign Language Center. [NFLC Occasional Papers.]Google Scholar
Shomamy, E. 1993b. A collaborative/diagnostic feedback model for testing foreign languages. In Douglas, D. and Chapelle, C. (eds.) A new decade of language testing research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL. 185–202.Google Scholar
Unesco. 1953. The use of vernacular languages in education. Paris: Monographs on Fundamental Education. No. 8.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. and Wilcox, P. (1991) Learning to see: American sign language as a second language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents/Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar