Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:52:23.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE WORKPLACE, THE SOCIETY AND THE WIDER WORLD: THE OFFSHORING AND OUTSOURCING INDUSTRY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Liz Hamp-Lyons  and
Jane Lockwood
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Workplace language assessment poses special issues for language testers, but also, when it becomes very large scale, it poses issues for language policy. This article looks at these issues, focusing on the offshore and outsourcing (O&O) industry as it is transitioning from native-speaking (NS) countries into nonnative-speaking (NNS) destinations such as India and the Philippines. This is obviously most impacted in call centers, where the ability of customer service representatives (CSRs) to communicate with ease with their native-English speaking customers is central to business success and can be key to a nation's economy. Having reviewed the (limited) research in this area, we take the Philippines as our example to explore how government, academe, and the business sector are dealing with the language proficiency and personnel-training issues caused by the exponential growth in this industry. Appropriate language assessments that are practical, while also being valid and reliable, are critical if the Philippines is to retain its position in this emerging market. Currently, call centers in Philippines complain of very poor recruitment rates due to poor language ability, and of poor quality communication outcomes measures: But how do they assess these key areas? We describe and evaluate the current situation in call center language assessment in the Philippines and discuss possible ways forward, for the Philippines and for the O&O industry more broadly.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 29 , March 2009 , pp. 145 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANNOTATED REFERENCES

Cowie, C. (2007). The accents of outsourcing: The meanings of “neutral” in the Indian call centre industry. World Englishes, 26 (3), 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forey, G., & Hood, S. (2008). The interpersonal dynamics in call centre interactions: Co-constructing the rise and fall of emotion. Discourse and Communication 2 (4), 389–408.Google Scholar
Forey, G., & Lockwood, J. (2007). “I'd love to put someone in jail for this.” An initial investigation of English needs in the business processing outsourcing (BPO) industry. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 308–326.Google Scholar
Friginal, E. (2007). Outsourced call centers and English in the Philippines. World Englishes, 26 (3), 331–345.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. (1997). The history of English in the Philippines. In Bautista, M. L. S. (Ed.), English is an Asian language: The Philippine context (pp. 7–16). Sydney, Australia: Macquarie Library.Google Scholar
Lockwood, J. (2002). Language training design and evaluation processes in Hong Kong workplaces. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Lockwood, J. (2008). What does the business processing outsourcing (BPO) industry want from English language assessment? Prospect, 23 (2), 60–75.Google Scholar
Lockwood, J., Forey, G., & Elias, N. (forthcoming). Call centre communication: Measurement processes in non-English speaking contexts. In Belcher, D., (Ed.), English for specific purposes in theory and practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lockwood, J., Forey, G., & Price, H. (2008). Englishes in the Philippine business processing outsourcing industry: Issues, opportunities and research. In Bautista, M. L. S. & Bolton, K. (Eds.), Philippines English: Linguistic and literary perspectives (pp. 219–241). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Reeves, N., & Wright, C. (1996). Linguistic auditing: A guide to identifying foreign language communication needs in corporations. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

OTHER REFERENCES

Alderson, J. C. (2007). ELPAC final validation report. University of Lancaster. Retrieved September 3, 2008, from http://elpac.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=50&Itemid=42Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (2008, September). Final report on a survey of aviation English tests. Retrieved December 3, 2008, from www.ealta.eu.org/guidelines.htmGoogle Scholar
Benton, G. (2005). Multicultural crews and the culture of globalization. Proceedings of the UAMU Conference 6th Annual General Assembly. Southampton, England: WIT Press.Google Scholar
Business Processing Association of the Philippines. (BPAP). (2007). Home page. Retrieved July 19, 2007, from www.bpap.comGoogle Scholar
Bramley, P., & Pahl, J. (1996). The evaluation of training in the social services. London: National Institute for Social Work.Google Scholar
Clark, C., Rogers, P., Murfett, U., & Ang, S. (Forthcoming). Is courtesy not enough? “Solidarity” in call center interactions (Working Paper). University of Michigan Ross School of Business.Google Scholar
CELBAN. Canadian English language benchmark assessment for nurses. Retrieved December 1, 2008, from www.celban.orgGoogle Scholar
Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elder, C. (2001). Assessing the language proficiency of teachers: Are there any border controls? Language Testing, 18 (1), 149–170.Google Scholar
Goldstein, I. (1993). Training in organisations: Needs assessment, development and evaluation. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. (2004). The social dimensions of Philippines English. World Englishes, 23 (1), 7–16.Google Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L. (2008). The right testing solution: Wal-Mart or Sanie Row? Paper presented at the 3rd Talking Across the World Conference, Bangalore, May.Google Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L., Lumley, T., Hamilton, J., & Lockwood, J. (2003). A context-led English language assessment system: Final report (Hong Kong Central Earmarked Research Grant No. 5254/99H). Hong Kong University Grants Council.Google Scholar
Ivasyuk, N. A. (2008). Quality standards in maritime English in Ukraine. In Zhukov, D. (Ed.), World maritime excellence (pp. 401–407). Retrieved September 19, 2008, from http://www.onma.edu.ua/iamuaga8/proceedings.pdfGoogle Scholar
Joyce, H. (1992). Workplace texts in the language classroom. Sydney, Australia: Curriculum Support Unit, NSW Adult Migrant Education.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A. (1994). Evaluating training programs—The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Lexicon Consulting Group (2007). Report for [XYZ] on Market Segment for Business Language Test (Restricted).Google Scholar
Lockwood, J. (2004). Consultancy Report for Call Centre “X”.Google Scholar
Lumley, T. (1998). Perceptions of language-trained raters and occupational experts in a test of occupational English language proficiency. English for Specific Purposes, 17 (4), 347–367.Google Scholar
Lumley, T., & Brown, A. (1996). Specific purpose language performance tests: Task and interaction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 105–136.Google Scholar
Lynch, B. (1996). Language programme evaluation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, C. (1995). Assessing the language proficiency of overseas-qualified teachers: The English language assessment (ELSA). In Brindley, G. (Ed.), Language assessment in action (pp. 11–29). Sydney, Australia: NCELTR.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (1990). Assessing the second language proficiency of health professionals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Linguistics and Language Studies, University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.Google Scholar
McNamara, T., & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: the social dimension. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
NASSCOM. (2005). The NASSCOM McKinsey study. Retrieved June 17, 2007, from http://www.nasscom.comGoogle Scholar
Nical, I., Smolicz, J. J., & Secombe, M. J. (2004). Rural students and the Philippine bilingual education program on the island of Leyte. In Tollefson, J. W. & Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.), Medium of instruction policies, which agenda? Whose agenda? (pp. 153–176). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Prince, D. (1992). Literacy in the workplace. New South Wales, Australia: New South Wales Adult Migrant Education Service.Google Scholar
Revell, R. (1994.) From control to management: Practices and trends in English for occupational purposes. In Boyle, J. & Falvey, P. (Eds.), English language testing in Hong Kong (pp. 300–313). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Strevens, P. (1984). Seaspeak reference manual. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Talking Across the World (TAW). (2005–2007). Presentations on language assessment in the BPO industry. Retrieved from http://www.talkingacrosstheworld.comGoogle Scholar
TEA www.maycoll.co.uk/aviation-english/index.htmGoogle Scholar
TELLCAP www.tellcap.ruGoogle Scholar
Trenkner, P., & Cole, C. (2003). Profiling the maritime English instructor. Proceedings of the 4th International Assembly of Maritime Universities. Retrieved September 9, 2008, from http://iamu-edu.org/generalassembly/aga4/trenkner-cole.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tuchman, M. (2004). Updates and downdates: Call centre 2010 in the Asia-Pacific region (Manila ITES 44–40 special publication).Google Scholar
Uy, V. (2004, October 8). Call centers join job fair in Manila: 20,000 workers wanted. Philippine Daily Inquirer, p. A12.Google Scholar