Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T17:12:13.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sociolinguistics: Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

Monica Heller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1980, in this journal, Joshua Fishman presented the major theoretical issue in sociolinguistics as being the link between microsociolinguistic and macrosociolinguistic processes. In 1984 that is still the case, although the issue is receiving more explicit attention than it did four years ago.

There are two branches of sociolinguistics which approach this issue in different ways. These two branches are interactionist and variationist sociolinguistics. Interactionist sociolinguistics is principally interested in what language use can tell us about social processes, and therefore a central concern is the social meaning of language use. Variationist sociolinguistics is interested in accounting for linguistic variation and change, at least partly as a product of the social distribution of language varieties. It is, therefore, less concerned with meaning as process, and more concerned with the interaction of linguistic and social systems; in this view the significance of language is mainly symbolic. In this review, I will discuss the contributions of these branches to the problem of the relationship between microsociolinguistics and macrosociolinguistics, as well as the theoretical problems peculiar to each branch.

Type
Sociolinguistics
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 5 , March 1984 , pp. 46 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Unannotated Bibliography

Agar, M. 1982. Whatever happened to cognitive anthropology? Human organization. 41.1.82–85.Google Scholar
Agar, M.. 1984. Ethnography doesn't live here anymore. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Forum on Ethnography in Education. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania. 1 April.Google Scholar
Alatis, J. E. (ed.) 1980. Current issues in bilingual education. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. [Georgetown University Round Table.]Google Scholar
Auer, J. C. P. 1984. On the meaning of conversational codeswitching. To appear in Auer, J. C. P. and di Luzio, A. (eds.) Interpretive sociolinguistics. Tübingen. [TS cited; no pagination available.]Google Scholar
Auer, J. C. P. and di Luzio, A.. 1983. Structure and meaning of linguistic variation in Italian migrant children in Germany. In Bauerle, R., Schwarze, C., and von Stechow, A. (eds.) Meaning, use and interpretation of languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1–21.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1972. Social networks. Addison-Wesley module in anthropology. Indianapolis: Addison-Wesley. [No. 26.]Google Scholar
Bauerle, R., Schwarze, C., and von Stechow, A. (eds.) Meaning, use and interpretation of languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1–21.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J. (eds.) 1980. Language and speech in American society. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
Bell, A. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in society. 13.2.145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A. 1984. Voices of others: Literacy in an East Harlem school. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Forum on Ethnography in Education. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania. 30 March.Google Scholar
Blanc, M., et al. 1982. Réseaux de communication. In Prujiner, A. (ed.) Variation du comportement langagier lorsque deux langues sont en contact. Québec: C.I.R.B. 73–77.Google Scholar
Blom, J. P. and Gumperz, J.. 1972. Social meaning in linguistic structures: Code-switching in Norway. In Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds.) Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 407–434.Google Scholar
Boissevain, J. and Mitchell, J.. 1973. Network analysis. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bott, E. 1971. Family and social network. London: Tavistock. [Revised edition.]Google Scholar
Breitborde, L. 1983. Levels of analysis in sociolinguistic explanation: Bilingual codeswitching, social relations, and domain theory. International journal of the sociology of language. 39.5–43.Google Scholar
Breton, R. 1984. The production and allocation of symbolic resources: An analysis of the linguistic and ethnocultural fields in Canada. Canadian review of sociology and anthropology. 21.2.123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brice Heath, S. 1983. Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brice Heath, S.. 1984. On not going narrative: The meaning of being literate in American education. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Forum on Ethnography in Education. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania. 30 March.Google Scholar
Carrasco, R., Vera, A., and Cazden, C.. 1981. Aspects of bilingual students' communicative competence in the classroom: A case study. In Duran, R. (ed.) Latino language and communicative behavior. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 237–250.Google Scholar
Cazden, C.. In press. Classroom discourse. In Wittrock, M. (ed.) Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cazden, C., Michaels, S., and Tabors, P.. In press. Spontaneous repairs in sharing time narratives: The intersection of metalinguistic awareness, speech event and narrative style. In Freedman, S. W. (ed.) The acquisition of written language: Revision and response. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A. 1973. Cognitive sociology: Language and meaning in social interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A.. 1980. Three models of discourse analysis: The role of social structure. Discourse processes. 3.101–132.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A.. 1981. Language and medicine. In Ferguson, C. and Brice Heath, S. (eds.) Language in the USA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 407–429.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A.. 1982. Language and belief in a medical setting. Paper presented at the 33rd Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, Washington, DC, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. 1984. The decade past, the decade to come: Some thoughts on language contact research. International journal of the sociology of language. 45.9–20.Google Scholar
Collins, J. 1982. Discourse style, classroom interaction and differential treatment. Journal of reading behavior. 14.4.429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, R. 1981. On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American journal of sociology. 86.5.984–1014.Google Scholar
Corsaro, W. 1983. Comment. International journal of the sociology of language. 43.67–76.Google Scholar
Dorian, N. 1981. Language death. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
R, Durán. (ed.) 1981. Latino language and communicative behavior. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. 1983. The identity of the sender in a Samoan orator's speech. Paper presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Chicago. 18 November.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. 1983. Comment. International journal of the sociology of language. 43.89–97.Google Scholar
Erlckson, F. and Shultz, J.. 1982. The counsellor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. and Brice Heath, S. (eds.) 1981. Language in the USA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, S. and Todd, A. (eds.) 1983. The social organization of doctor-patient communication. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. 1980. Theoretical issues and problems in the sociolinguistic enterprise. In Kaplan, R. B., et al. (eds.) Annual review of applied linguistics I. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 161–167.Google Scholar
Frake, C. 1980. Language and cultural description: Essays by Charles O. Frake. Stanford: Stanford University Press. [Ed. A. Dill.]Google Scholar
Freedman, S. W. (ed.) In press. The acquisition of written language: Revision and response. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gal, S. 1979. Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gal, S.. In press. Phonological style in bilingualism: The interaction of structure and use. In Schiffrin, D. (ed.) Meaning, form and use in context. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. [Georgetown University Round Table.]Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. 1972. Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. In Sudnow, D. (ed.) Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press. 1–30.Google Scholar
Giglioli, P. (ed.) 1972. Language in social context. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. 1972. The speech community. In Giglioli, P. (ed.) Language in social context. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 219–231.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.. 1982a. Social network and language shift. In Gumperz, J.Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.. 1982b. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. and Cook-Gumperz, J.. 1982. Interethnic interaction in committee negotiations. In Gumperz, J. (ed.) Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 145–162.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds.) 1972. Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Heller, M. 1982. ‘Bonjour, hello?’: Negotiations of language choice in Montreal. In Gumperz, J. (ed.) Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 108–118.Google Scholar
Heller, M.. 1984a. Strategies of ambiguity: Code-switching in the management of conflict. Toronto working papers. 5.66–89.Google Scholar
Heller, M. 1984b. Language and ethnic identity in a Toronto French-language school. Canadian ethnic studies. 16.2.Google Scholar
Hemphill, L. 1984. “Literate” elements in a working class adolescents’ discussion. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Forum on Ethnography in Education. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania. 31 March.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1984. Sociolinguistics: Stability and consolidation. International journal of the sociology of language. 45.39–46.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. B., et al. (eds.) 1980. Annual review of applied linguistics I. Rowley, MA; Newbury House.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., et al. 1983. Session on the Philadelphia LCV Project. Papers presented at the 12th Annual NWAVE conference.Montréal. October.Google Scholar
Lambert, R. and Freed, B.. 1982. The loss of language skills. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Language Policy Task Force. 1984. Speech and ways of speaking in a bilingual Puerto Rican community. Final report to the National Institute of Education. New York: Center for Puerto Rican Studies, Hunter College.Google Scholar
Leitner, G. 1983. Indian English: A critique of the ethnography of speaking. International journal of the sociology of language. 44.153–167.Google Scholar
Mathiot, M. 1983. Towards a meaning-based theory of face-to-face interaction. International journal of the sociology of language. 43.5–56.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. 1983. The role of language and the language of role in institutional decision-making. Language in society. 12.2.187–212.Google Scholar
Michaels, S. 1982. “Sharing time”: Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in society. 10.3.423–442.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. 1980. Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mougeon, R., et al. In press. Acquisition et enseignement du franqais en situation minoritaire: Le cas des Franco-Ontariens. Canadian modern language review.Google Scholar
O'Barr, W. 1982. Linguistic evidence: Language, power and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (eds.) 1979. Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
A, Prujiner. (ed.) 1982. Variation du comportement langagier lorsque deux langues sont en contact. Quebec: C.I.R.B.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. 1980. The social life of language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Schank, R. and Abelson, R. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understandings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. 1979. Getting it together: An ethnographic approach to the study of the development of communicative competence. In Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (eds.) Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. 73–110.Google Scholar
D, Schiffrin. (ed.) In press. Meaning, form and use in context. Washington: DC: Georgetown University Press. [Georgetown University Round Table.]Google Scholar
Shuy, R. 1980. Problems of communication in the cross-cultural medical interview. In Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J. (eds.) Language and speech in American society. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. 109–127.Google Scholar
D, Sudnow. (ed.) 1972. Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Thibault, P. 1983. Equivalence et grammaticalisation. Montreal: Universite de Montreal. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Wilhite, M. 1982. Socioeconomic factors in bilingualism in two Guatemalan Indian communities. CAE quarterly. 13.1.47–60.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. C. (ed.) 1982. Communicating in the classroom. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
M, Wittrock. (ed.) In press. Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wong Fillmore, L. 1980. Learning a second language: Chinese children in the American classroom. In Alatis, J. (ed.) Current issues in bilingual education. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. [Georgetown University Round Table.] 309–325.Google Scholar
Wong Fillmore, L.. 1982. Instructional language as linguistic input: Second language learning in the classroom. In Wilkinson, L. C. (ed.) Communicating in the classroom. New York: Academic Press. 283–296.Google Scholar