Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T14:02:53.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language in the Classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Courtney B. Cazden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This review discusses only research on the discourse structure of classroom activities—lessons and other activities in which the teacher is a participant— with special attention to assumptions underlying alternative models (in the non-technical sense of that word). Two other reviews (Cazden 1986a; in press) also discuss the register of teachers and students (considered as the paradigmatic complement to syntagmatic structure); discourse among student peers (in contrast to talk with the teacher who has greater ascribed power as well as knowledge), and relationships between discourse and learning.

Type
Language and the Professions
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 7 , March 1986 , pp. 18 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Au, K. H. and Mason, J. M.. 1981. Social organizational factors in learning to read: The balance of rights hypothesis. Reading research quarterly. 17.1.115–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A. 1981. Interruptions and the interpretation of conversation. Discourse processes. 4.2.171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, S. D., et al. 1983. Real and non-real time interaction: Unraveling multiple threads of discourse. Discourse processes. 6.1.59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. B. 1983. Can ethnographic research go beyond the status quo? Anthropology and education quarterly. 14.1.33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. B. 1986a. Classroom discourse. In Wittrock, M. C. (ed.) Handbook of research on teaching. 3rd ed.New York: Macmillan. 432–463.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B.. 1986b. Review of M. J. Willes Children into pupils: A study of language in early schooling. Journal of child language. 13.2.447–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. B.. In press. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. 1983. Review of Coulmas, F. (ed.) Conversational routines: Explorations in standardized communication situations and pre-patterned speech. Applied linguistics. 4.2.172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsaro, W. A. 1985. Sociological approaches to discourse analysis. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. 1. Orlando, FL:Academic Press. 167–192.Google Scholar
Coulthard, M. 1977. An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dore, J. and McDermott, R. P.. 1982. Linguistic indeterminacy and social context in utterance interpretation. Language. 58.2.374–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. D. and Furlong, J. J.. 1978. The language of teaching: Meaning in classroom interaction. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. 1975. Gate-keeping and the melting pot: Interaction in counseling interviews. Harvard educational review. 45.1.44–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, F.. 1982. Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structures in lessons. In Wilkinson, L. C. (ed.) Communicating in the classroom. New York: Academic Press. 153–181.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. 1984. Schopl literacy, reasoning and civility: An anthropologist's perspective. Review of educational research. 54.4.525–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, F. and Shultz, J.. 1977. When is a context: Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. Quarterly newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development. 1.2.5–10. [Also in J. Green and and C. Wallat (eds.) 1981. Ethnography and language in educational settings. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 147–160.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. 1981. Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. C. 1985. Recent developments in conversation analysis. Socio-linguistics: Newsletter of the research committee on sociolinguistics, International Sociological Association. 15. 1.1–19. [Shorter version in D. Roger and P. Bull (eds.) In press. Interdisciplinary approaches to interpersonal communication. Avon: Multilingual Matters.]Google Scholar
Hoetker, J. and Ahlbrand, W. P. Jr. 1969. The persistence of the recitation. American educational research journal. 6.2.145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, J. L. 1986. Using language in classrooms. Victoria [Australia]: Deacon University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 1979. Activity types and language. Linguistics. 17.5/6.365–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.. 1981. Some pre-observations on the modeling of dialogue. Discourse processes. 4.2.93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, I. 1979. The West Australian Aboriginal child and classroom interaction: A sociolinguistic approach. Journal of pragmatics. 3.3/4.305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H. 1979. Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, S. and Cazden, C. B.. 1986. Teacher/child collaboration as oral preparation for literacy. In Schieffelin, B. B. (ed.) Acquisition of literacy: Ethnographic perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 132–154.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G.. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language. 50.4.696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. 1972. Notes on conversational practise: Formulating place. In Sudnow, D. (ed.) Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press. 75–119. [Reprinted in P. P. Giglioli (ed.) 1972. Language and social context. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 95–135.]Google Scholar
Shultz, J. J., Erickson, F., and Florio, S.. 1982. “Where's the floor?”: Aspects of social relationships in communication at home and at school. In Gilmore, P. and Glatthorn, A. (eds.) Children in and out of school:Ethnography and education. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. 88–123.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH. and Brazil, D.. 1982. Teacher talk. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH. and Coulthard, R. M.. 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupilsr London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. 1983. Language, schools and classrooms. 2nd ed.London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.. 1984. Review of J. McH. Sinclair and D. Brazil Teacher talk Applied linguistics. 5.1.71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M.. 1986. Educational linguistics. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. 1981. Discourse studies and education. Applied linguistics. 2.1.1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A.. (ed.) 1985. Handbook of discourse analysis. 4 Vols. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar