Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:23:12.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Input and Interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Richard Young
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The role that input plays in second language learning and the interactions between learners and other speakers of the language which provide some of that input are two of the most discussed topics in the contemporary field of second language acquisition [SLA]. Several surveys of the considerable body of literature on input and interaction have appeared recent books on SLA (Hatch 1983a ch. 9, Ellis 1985a ch. 6, Young and Doughty 1987, Chaudron 1988 chs. 3–5) and two collections of papers on input and interaction research have been published (Gass and Madden 1985, Day 1986). This essay will outline the main issues which have emerged form this scholarship and comment on some of the more important theroretical and empirical papers.

Type
Social/psychological factors in sla
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 9 , March 1988 , pp. 122 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Chaudron, C. 1983. Simplification of input: Topic reinstatements and their effects on L2 learners' recognition and recall. TESOL quarterly. 17. 3. 437–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. 1988. Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. and Richards, J. C.. 1986. The effects of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures. Applied linguistics. 7. 2. 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S.P. 1967. The significance of learners' errors. International review of applied linguistics. 5. 161–170. [Reprinted in S. P. Corder 1981. Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ]Google Scholar
Craik, F.I.M. and Lockhart, R. S.. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of verbal learning and cerbal behavior. 11. 6. 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, R. R. (ed.) 1986. Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. and Pica, T.. 1986. “Information gap tasks”: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL quarterly. 20. 2. 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, P. A. 1985. Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In Gass, S. M. and Madden, C. G. (eds.) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 147–181.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1985a. Understanding second language acquistion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1985b. Teacher-pupil interaction in second language development, In Gass, S. M. and Madded, C. G. (eds.) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 69–85.Google Scholar
Faerch, C. and G., Kasper. 1980. Processes and strategies in foreign language learning and communication. Interlanguage studies bulletin—Utrecht. 5. 1. 47–118.Google Scholar
Gass, S.M. and Madden, C.G. (eds.) 1985. Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 149–161.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. 1984. Krashen's monitor and Occam's razor. Applied linguistics. 5. 2. 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, L. F. 1984. Contrasts in teachers' language use in a Chinese-English bilingual classroom In Handscombe, J.Orem, R. A., and Taylor, B. P. (eds.) On TESOL '83: The question of control. Washington, DC: TESOL. 39–52Google Scholar
Hatch, E.M. 1983a. Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hatch, E.M., 1983b. Simplified input and second language acquisition. In Andersen, R.W. (ed.) Pidginization and creolization as language acquistion, Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 64–86.Google Scholar
Kelch, K. 1985 Modified input as an aid to comprehension. Studies in second language acquisition. 7. 1. 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 1976. An explanation for the morpheme acquisition orders of second language learners. Language learning 26. 1. 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. 1983a. Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied linguistics. 4. 2. 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. 1983b. Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in second language acquisition. 5. 2. 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., 1985. Input and second language acquisition theory. In Gass, S. M. and Madden, C. G. (eds.) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House 377–393Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1982. Talking to children in Western Samoa. Language in society. 11. 1. 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. 1987. Second-language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied linguistics. 8. 1. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T and Doughty, C.. 1985a. Input and interaction in the communicative classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In Gass, S. M and Madden, C. G. (eds.) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 115–132.Google Scholar
Pica, T. and Doughty, C.. 1985b. The role of group work in classroom second language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition 7. 2. 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, C.J. 1982. Ethnic styles in classroom discourse. In Hines, M. E. and Rutherford, W. (eds.) On TESOL'81. Washington, DC: TESOL, 11–24.Google Scholar
Scarcella, R. and Higa, C.. 1981. Input, negotiation and age differences in second language acquisition. Language learning. 31. 2. 409–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
scollon, R. 1979. A real early stage: An unzippered condensation of a dissertation on child language In Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.) Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. 215–227.Google Scholar
Varonis, E. M. and Gass, S. M.. 1985. Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied linguistics.6. 1. 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner-Gough, J. and Hatch, E.. 1975. The importance of input data in second language acquisition studies. Language learning. 25. 2. 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G., 1981. Learning through interaction: The study of language development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. and Doughty, C.. 1987. Negotiation in context: A review of reserach. In Lantolf, J. P. and Labarca, A. (eds.) Research in second language learning: Focus on the classroom. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 212–223.Google Scholar