Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:54:37.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English and Marathi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Rajeshwari Pandharipande
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The goal of this paper is to compare and contrast some discourse features of English and Marathi. The paper is divided into four parts. The introductory sections review the main theoretical approaches for discourse analysis in general and discourse in South Asian languages in particular. Some of these insights are later used in this study. The first sections of part 2 point out the role of sociocultural differences in the discourse patterns of English and Marathi. The second section of part 2 focuses on the differences in the morphological and syntactic patterns which are used as discourse strategies in Marathi and English.

Type
Linguistics and Written Discourse in Particular Languages
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 3 , March 1982 , pp. 118 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abhinava, Gupta. 1000 A.D. [1926 ed.] Abhinava Bhāratī. Vol. 1. Baroda: Gaekwad Oriendal Series.Google Scholar
ānandavardhana, . 800 A.D. [1981 ed.] Dhavanyāloka. Bombay: The Nirṇay Sagar Press. [Kāvym¯lā Series, 25.]Google Scholar
Bhāmaha, . 700 A.D. [1970 ed.] Kāvyālaṃkāra of Bhāmaha. Nagannath, P. V. (ed.) 2nd ed. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas.Google Scholar
Bharata, . 300 A.D. [1894 ed.] Nāṭya ŝāstra. Bombay: Nirṇay Sagar Press. [Kāvymālā Series, 42.]Google Scholar
Bhatia, T. K. 1981. The treatment of transitivity in the Hindi grammatical tradition. Studies in the linguistic sciences. 11. 2195–208.Google Scholar
Bhatia, T. K. 1982. The treatment of discourse in the Hindi grammatical tradition. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Conference on South Asta. Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Bloch, J. 1920. [1970 ed.] La formation de la language marathe. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas [Tr. Dev Raj Chanana.]Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness. In Li, C. N. (ed.) Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press. 25–56.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. 1980. The development of consciousness in the production of a narrative. In Chafe, W. L. (ed.) The pear stories: Connitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Albex. 9–50.Google Scholar
Chaitanya, K. 1977. A new history of Sanskrit literature. Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hauge: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. M. 1980. Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In Chafe, W. L. (ed.) The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspectic of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Albex. 127–202.Google Scholar
Corbett, E. P. J. 1965. Classical rhetoric for the modern student. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damle, M. K. 1911. [1966 ed.] ŝāstrīya Marathi vyākaraṇ. Pune: Joshi Lokhande Prakashan.Google Scholar
De, S. K. 1923. Studies in the history of Sanskrit poetics. 2 Vols. London: Luzae.Google Scholar
Downing, P. 1980. Factors influencing lexical choice in narratives. In Chafe, W. L. (ed.) The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspectic of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Albex. 89–126.Google Scholar
Freedle, R., Naus, M. and Schwartz, L.. 1977. Prose processing from a psychocial perspective. In Freedle, R. (ed.) Discourse processes: Advances in research and theory. [Vol. I. Discourse Production and comprehension.] Norword, NJ: Albex. 175–191.Google Scholar
Ghatge, A. M. 1963. The Konkani of South Kanara: Survey of Marathi dialect series. Bombay: State Board of Litrature and Culture.Google Scholar
Grimes, J. 1975. The thread of discourse. The Hauge: Mouton.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. 1977. Sociocultural knoledge in conversational inference. In Saville-Troike, M. (ed.) Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 191–212.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. 1982. The linguistic bases of communicative competence. In Tannen, D. (ed.) Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 323–334. [Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics.]Google Scholar
Gupte, S. M. 1975. Relative construction in Marathi. East Lansing: Michigan State University. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hinds, J. 1976. Aspects of Japanese discourse structure. Tokyo: Hinode.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. E. and Duhamel, P. A.. 1962. Rhetoric: Principles and usage. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentics Hall.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B.. 1980. The Indianization of English: The English language in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B.. 1982. Meaning in deviation: Toward understanding non-native English texts. In Kachru, B. B. (ed.) The other tougue: English across cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 325–350.Google Scholar
Kachru, Y.. 1980. Aspects of Hindi grammar. New Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
Kachru, Y.. 1981. Transitivity and volitionality in Hindi-Urdu. Studies in the linguistic sciences. 11. 2. 181–194.Google Scholar
Kachru, Y.. 1982. Written discourse in Hindi and English. Paper presented at the 11th annual Conference on South Asia. Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Kandiah, T. 1981. Lankan English schizoglossia. English world-wide: A journal of varieties of English. 2. 1. 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. B. 1980. Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. In Croft, K. (ed.) Readings on English as a second language for teachers and teacher trainees. 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: Winthrop. 399–418.Google Scholar
Keith, A. B. 1920. A history of Sanskrit literature. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kṣemendra, . 1100 A.D. [1888 ed.] Aucitya vixcār carcā kāvyamālā, gucchaka 1. Bombay: Nirṇay Sagar Press.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, K. P. 1969. Marathi vyākaraṇāce vyākaran. Pune: Shri lekhan vacan Bhandar.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, K. P., Tulpule, S. G., and Priyolkar, A. K.. Language and literature. Maharastra State Gazetteer. Bombay.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, K. P. 1970. Prācīn Marathi Gadya. Bombay.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. 1976. Subject, theme, and the speaker's empathy. In Li, C. N. (ed.) Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press. 417–444.Google Scholar
Kuntaka, . 1015 A.D. [1961 ed.] The vakroti-jīvita. Mukhopadhyay, K. L. (ed.) Calcutta.Google Scholar
Levi, D. M. 1979. Communicative goals and strategies: Between discourse and syntax. In Givón, T. (ed.) Syntax and semantics Vol. 12. New York: Academic Press. 183–209.Google Scholar
Longacre, R. 1968. Discourse, paragraph, and sentence structure in selected Philippine languages. Santta Ana, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mammaṭa, . 1100 A.D. [1968 ed.] The poetic delight: Kāvyaprakāŝa of Mammaṭa. Dwividi, R. C. (ed.) New Delhi: Motilal Banarsida.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L. 1982. Discourse theory and the independence of sentence grammer. In Tannen, D. (ed.) Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 194–204. [Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics.]Google Scholar
Pandharipande, R. 1981a. Syntax and semantics of the passive construction in selected South Asian languages. Urbana: University of Illinois. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, R. 1981b. Transitivity in Hindi. Studies in the linguistic sciences. 11. 2. 77–100.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, R. 1982a. A contrastive discourser in Marathi and English. Paper presented at the 11th annual Conference on South Asia. Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, R. 1982b. Language contact and language change: Studies in Indian multilingulism. Urbana: University of Illinois. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, R. 1982c. Nativization of loanwords in Marathi. Linguistics. 19 9–10, 987–1011.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, R. 1982d. Volitionality: More evidence for a constraint on passive in Hindi. South Asian review. 89–103.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. 1967. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. 2nd ed.The Hauge: Mouton.Google Scholar
Vāmana, . 900 A.D. [1907–1908 ed.] Kavyalankara sutras. Bhatta, R. G. (ed.) Banaras: Braj B. Das and Company. [Banaras Sanskrit Series 134, 140.]Google Scholar
The Vedānta Sutras. 400 A.D. (1908 ed.) The sacred books of the East Vol. 34 Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wali, K. 1967. Two Marathi reflexives and their implication for the causative structure. Syracuse: Syracuse University. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar