Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:10:30.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discourse analysis in professional contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

John M. Swales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This bibliographic essay will only consider work published after 1986 in the belief that Volume VII of the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL VII, Language in Professional Contexts, 1987) adequately covers earlier material. Professions will be understood in a non-elitist sense which includes service and other occupations )(c.f., Coleman 1989) as well as the more prototypical categories of medicine, law, etc. This essay will also cover those areas of academic discourse that can be reasonably viewed as professional; for example, the publishing of research papers (Myers 1990), the giving of research presentations (Dubois 1987), or the providing of instruction (Briggs, et al. 1990).

Type
Discourse Analysis in Professional Contexts
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 11 , March 1990 , pp. 103 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams Smith, D. E. 1984. Medical discourse: Aspects of author's comment. The ESP journal. 3.1.25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelsward, V. 1989. Defendant's interpretations of encouragements in court: The construction of meaning in an institutionalized context. Journal of pragmatics. 13.741–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agar, M. 1990. Language scenes and political schemas. Journal of pragmatics 14.1.25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becher, T. 1989. Academic tribes and territories. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. 1987. Language of the law. Language teaching 20.4.227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. 1989. Legislative writing: A case of neglect in EA/OLP courses. English for specific purposes. 8.3.223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. and Finegan, E. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text. 9.1.93–124.Google Scholar
Briggs, S., Hyon, S., Aldridge, P. and Swales, J.. 1990. The international teaching assistant: An annotated critical bibliography. Ann Arbor, MI: English Language Institute Test Publications.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. 1987. Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts. Journal of pragmatics. 11.2.211–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M.Hoeks, J. and Kreutz, H. J.. 1988. Cross-cultural responses to academic discourse patterns. Folia linguistica 22.3/4.457–475.Google Scholar
Coupland, J., Coupland, N., Giles, H. and Wiemann, J.. 1989. My life in your hands: Processes of self-disclosure in intergenerational talk. In Coupland, N. (ed.) Styles of dicourse. London: Croom Helm. 201–253.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (ed.) 1989. Styles of discourse. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Davies, F. 1988. Reading between the lines: Thematic choice as a device for presenting writer viewpoint in academic discourse. The ESPecialist. 9.1/2.173–200.Google Scholar
Drass, K. A. 1988. Discourse and occupational perspective: A comparison of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. Discourse processes. 11.2.163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, B. L. 1987. Something of the order of around forty to forty-four: Imprecise numerical expressions in biomedical slide talks. Language in society. 16.4.527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, B. L. 1988. Citation in biomedical journal articles. English for specific purposes. 7.3.181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggington, W. A. 1987. Written academic discourse in Korean: Impolications for effective communication. In Connor, U. and Kaplan, R. B. (eds.) Writing across language: Analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley. 153–168.Google Scholar
Frank, J. 1989. On conversational involvement by mail: the use of questions in direct sales letters. Text. 9.2.231–259.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, D. 1988. A turn-taking system for British news interviews. Language in society. 17.3.401–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, A. D. 1989. Collegial discourse: Professional conversation among peers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R.. 1989. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, S. 1989. Defendant resistance to power and control in court. In Coleman, H. (ed.) Working with language: A multi-disciplinary consideration of language use in work contexts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 131–164.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A. and Dudley-Evans, T.. 1988. A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for specific purposes. 7.2113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, P. M. 1990. The problem of the problem question in English for academic legal purposes. English for specific purposes. 9.3.215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, S. 1987. References to other researches in literary research articles. ELR Journal, 1987. 1.33–78.Google Scholar
Kurzon, D. 1987. Latin for lawyers: Degrees of textual integration. Applied linguistics. 8.3.233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linde, C. 1988. The quantitative study of communicative success: Politeness and accidents in aviation discourse. Language in Society. 17.3.375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, J. 1989. Approaches to describing doctor-patient interviews. In Coleman, H. (ed.) Working with language: A multi-disciplinary consideration of language use in work contexts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 263–296.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and Rothery, J.. 1986. What a functional approach to the writing task can show teaches about “good writing”. In Couture, B. (ed.) Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 241–265.Google Scholar
Manson, D. 1989. An examination of authentic dialogues for use in the ESP classroom. English for specific purposes. 8.1.85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. E. 1988. The context of oral and written language: A framework for mode and medium switching. Language in society. 17.3.351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najjar, H.Y. 1990. Arabic as a research language: The case of the agricultural sciences. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan. Ph.D.diss.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, C. 1990. The composition process of science writers. English for specific purposes. 9.21.169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, J. 1987. Organizational features in chemical engineering articles. ELR journal 1987. 1.79–116.Google Scholar
Pettinari, C. J. 1988. Task, talk, and text in the operating room: A study in medical discourse. Norwood, NJ. Ablex.Google Scholar
Pettinari, C. J. 1990. Review of “Discourse and institutional authority: Medicine, education, and law”. English for specific purposes. 9 3.266–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, F. 1988. Airspeak: Radiotelephony communication for pilots. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rogers, P. S. and Swales, J.. 1990. We the people? An analysis of the Dana Corporation policies document. The journal of business communication. 27.3.293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rounds, P. L. 1987. Characterizing successful classroom discourse for NNS teaching assistant training. TESOL quarterly. 21.4.643–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rymer, J. 1988. Scientific composing processes: How eminent scientists write journal articles. In Joliffe, D.A. (ed.) Advances in writing research Volume 2: Writing in academic disciplines. Norwood, NJ: Albex. 211–250.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F.. 1990. Metaphors in medical English prose: A comparative study with French and Spanish. English for specific purposes. 9.2.145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F., Defives, G., Jensen, C. and De Filipis, M.. 1989. Principal component analysis and medical English discourse: An investigation into genre analysis. System. 17.1.21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, W. J. (ed.) 1990. Economics as discourse: An analysis of the language of economists. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharrock, W. W. and Watson, D.. 1989. Talk and police work: Notes on the traffic in information. In Coleman, H. (ed.) Working with language: A multi-disciplinary consideration of language use in work contexts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 431–450.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. W. 1988. The role of text in the processing of people in organizations. Discourse processes. 11.1.61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. and Najjar, H. 1988. The writing of research article introductions. Written communication. 4.2.175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadros, A. 1989. Predictive categories in university textbooks. English for specific purposes. 8.1.17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. 1990. Discourse analysis: The excitement of diversity. Text. 10.1/2.109–111.Google Scholar
Tinberg, R. J. 1988. The pH of a volatile genre. English for specific purposes. 7.3.205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, A. D.. 1989. Intimate adversaries. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, K.. 1988. A discourse analysis of four discourse studies. Discourse processes. 11.2.243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsitsa, M. 1990. Une contribution à la didactique des language de spécialité. ALSEDLSP Newsletter. 13.2.27–41.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. E., Jeffries, A., and Davies, C. 1988. The effect of discourse structuring devices on listener perceptions in non-native university teachers' spoken discourse. World Englishes. 7.2.101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uehara, R. J. K. and Candlin, C.. 1989. The structural and discoursal characteristics of voir dire. In Coleman, H. (ed.) Working with language: A multi–disciplinary consideration of language use in work contexts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 453–474.Google Scholar
Ventola, E. 1987. The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Weissberg, R. and Buker, S.. 1990. Writing up research: Experimental research report writing for students of English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.Google Scholar
Wowk, M. T. 1989. Talk in an organization: Organization in talk. In Coleman, H. (ed.) Working with language: A multi–disciplinary consideration of language use in work contexts. Berlin: Moutton de Gruyter. 541–564.Google Scholar
Yule, G. 1990. Interactive conflict resolution in English. Paper presented at the 24th annual TESOL Convention, San Francisco, CA, 03, 1990.Google Scholar