Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:28:43.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current Uses for Task-Based Language Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

John M. Norris
John M. Norris*
Affiliation:
Georgetown [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Task-based language assessment (TBLA) has generated interest since the early 1990s, primarily in conjunction with the ongoing development of task-based language teaching (TBLT) and the pursuit of developing appropriate testing models for this approach to pedagogy (Norris, 2002, 2009). However, tasks also offer considerable advantages for language assessment, beyond their obvious relevance within TBLT classes and programs. In fact, major innovations in the general domain of language assessment over the past two decades have occurred in conjunction with the introduction of tasks into assessment design, largely in response to the need for tests that better represent examinees’ abilities to use the language (Mislevy, Steinberg, & Almond, 2002), but also because tasks offer a meaningful space for language teachers, testers, learners, and others to examine, understand, and improve language learning endeavors (Van Gorp & Deygers, 2013). This article reviews the considerable range of current uses for TBLA, illustrating different types of assessment with concrete examples and highlighting distinct roles for tasks as a basic unit of analysis in test design, interpretation, and intended consequence. Ultimately, it argues that tasks offer a fundamental, though not exclusive, foundation for useful language assessment, and that task-based assessment, though challenging, is probably worth the effort.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 36 , March 2016 , pp. 230 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adair-Hauck, B., Glisan, E., Koda, K., Swender, E., & Sandrock, P. (2006). The Integrated Performance Assessment (IPA): Connecting assessment to instruction and learning. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 359–382.Google Scholar
Alanen, R., Huhta, A., & Tarnanen, M. (2010). Designing and assessing L2 writing tasks across CEFR proficiency levels. In Bartning, I., Martin, M., & Vedder, I. (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between language testing and SLA research (pp. 21–56). EUROSLA Monograph. Retrieved from http://www.eurosla.org/eurosla-monograph-series-2/ Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (2009). Air safety, language assessment policy, and policy implementation: The case of aviation English. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F. (2002). Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19 (4), 453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F. (2007). What is the construct? The dialectic of abilities and contexts in defining constructs in language assessment. In Fox, J., Wesche, M., Bayliss, D., Cheng, L., Turner, C., & Doe, C. (Eds.), Language testing reconsidered (pp. 41–71). Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, J., Van Moere, A., & Cheng, J. (2010). Validating automated speaking tests. Language Testing, 27 (3), 355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G. (1994). Task-centered assessment in language learning: The promise and the challenge. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED386045)Google Scholar
Brindley, G. (2013). Task-based assessment. In Chapelle, C. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. London, UK: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1141 Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2004). Performance assessment: Existing literature and directions for research. Second Language Studies, 22 (2), 91–139.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (4), 653–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., Norris, J. M., & Bonk, W. (2002). Investigating task-based second language performance assessment. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language curriculum. Language Testing, 19 (4), 419–437.Google Scholar
Benchmarks, Centre for Canadian Language. (2012). Canadian language benchmarks: English as a second language for adults. Ottawa, Canada: Retrieved from http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/pub/language-benchmarks.pdf Google Scholar
Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2001). Task-based assessment: Characteristics and validity evidence. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 210–228). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2003). Second language interaction: Current perspectives and future trends. Language Testing, 20 (4), 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M. (Eds.). (2011). Building a validity argument for the Test of Teaching English as a Foreign Language. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Colpin, M., & Gysen, S. (2006). Developing and introducing task-based language tests. In Branden, K. Van den (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 151–174). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curriculum Development Council. (1993). Guide to the primary school curriculum. Hong Kong: Curriculum Development Institute, Education Department.Google Scholar
Davison, C. (2007). Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4, 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
East, M. (2012). Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective: Insights from New Zealand. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
East, M. (2015). Coming to terms with innovative high-stakes assessment practice: Teachers’ viewpoints on assessment reform. Language Testing, 32, 101–120.Google Scholar
Elder, C. (2001). Assessing the language proficiency of teachers: Are there any border controls? Language Testing, 18 (2), 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, C., Pill, J., Woodward-Kron, R., McNamara, T., Manias, E., Webb, G., & McColl, G. (2012). Health professionals’ views of communication: Implications for assessing performance on a health-specific English language test. TESOL Quarterly, 46 (2), 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Educational Testing Service (ETS). (2016). TOEFL iBT® test questions [Electronic document]. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/toefl/ibt/prepare/test_questions Google Scholar
Fischer, J., Chouissa, C., Dugovičová, S., & Virkkunen-Fullenwider, A. (2011). Guidelines for task-based university language testing. Graz, Austria: European Center for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Gysen, S., & Van Avermaet, P. (2005). Issues in functional language performance assessment: The case of the certificate Dutch as a foreign language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2 (1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong Kong SAR. (n.d.). Task-based assessment for English language learning at secondary level [Electronic document]. Retrieved from http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/eng/TBA_Eng_Sec/index.html Google Scholar
International Civil Aviation Organization PRICE Study Group. (2007). ICAO policy on language proficiency testing. Montreal, Canada: Author.Google Scholar
International English Language Testing System (IELTS). (2012). IELTS guide for teachers. Manchester, UK: British Council.Google Scholar
Jamieson, J., Jones, S., Kirsch, I., Mosenthal, P., & Taylor, C. (2000). TOEFL 2000 framework. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Kane, M., Crooks, T., & Cohen, A. (1999). Validating measures of performance. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18 (2), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, J. (2015). Language for specific purpose (LSP) performance assessment in Asian call centres: Strong and weak definitions. Language Testing in Asia, 5 (3). doi: 10.1186/s40468-014-0009-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., & Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In Byram, M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597–603). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Mislevy, R., Steinberg, L., & Almond, R. (2002). Design and analysis in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19 (4), 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. (1996). Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century. Yonkers, NY: Author.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2002). Interpretations, intended uses and designs in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19 (4), 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In Long, M. & Doughty, C. (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., & Bonk, W. (2002). Examinee abilities and task difficulty in task-based L2 performance assessment. Language Testing, 19 (4), 395–418.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., & Yoshioka, J. K. (1998). Designing second language performance assessment. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Norton, B., & Stewart, G. (1999). Accountability in language assessment of adult immigrants in Canada. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 56 (2), 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Occupational English Test (OET). (n.d.). The English language test for the healthcare sector. Retrieved from https://www.occupationalenglishtest.org/ Google Scholar
Park, M. (2015). Development and validation of virtual interactive tasks for an aviation English assessment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Purpura, J. E., & Turner, C. E. (2014). Learning-oriented assessment in language classrooms: Using assessment to gauge and promote language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 167–185). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. (2010). Standards for the recognition of initial TESOL programs in P-12 ESL teacher education. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Depauw, V., & Gysen, S. (2002). A computerized task-based test of L2 Dutch for vocational training purposes. Language Testing, 19, 438–452.Google Scholar
Van Gorp, K., & Deygers, B. (2013). Task-based language assessment. In Kunnan, A. J. (Ed.), The companion to language assessment: Vol. II. Approaches and development (pp. 578–593). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. (2013). Incorporating a formative assessment cycle into task-based language teaching. In Shehadeh, A. & Coombe, C. (Eds.), Researching and implementing task-based language learning and teaching in EFL contexts (pp. 287–312). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G. (2001). Influences on performance in task-based oral assessments. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 186–209). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G. (2008). Task and performance based assessment. In Hornberger, N. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language education (pp. 2251–2262). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar