Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T19:21:43.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AUDIENCE, AUTHORSHIP, AND ARTIFACT: THE EMERGENT SEMIOTICS OF WEB 2.0

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Mark Warschauer  and
Douglas Grimes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The second-generation Web has amplified and extended new ways of online communication. Millions of people now interact through blogs, collaborate through wikis, play multiplayer games, publish podcasts and video, build relationships through social network sites, and evaluate all the above forms of communication through feedback and ranking mechanisms. This article analyzes the emergent semiotics of what has been called Web 2.0 by focusing on three critical elements of language use and communication: audience, authorship, and artifact. Drawing on recent theoretical and empirical work, this article considers the significance of transformations in these three areas for both research and teaching.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 27 , March 2007 , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANNOTATED REFERENCES

Black, R. W. (in press). Adolescents and online fan fiction. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bloch, J. (2007). Abdullah's blogging: A generation 1.5 student enters the blogosphere. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 128–141. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/bloch/default.htmlGoogle Scholar
Chesher, C. (2005). Blogs and the crisis of authorship. Paper presented at the Blogtalk Downunder Conference. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?page_id=40 Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, J., (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gurak, L. J., Antonijevic, S., Johnson, L., Ratliff, C., & Reyman, J. (Eds.). (2004). Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs [Web site]. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/Google Scholar
Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Bonus, S., & Wright, E. (2005). Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information, Technology & People, 18(2), 142–171. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.blogninja.com/it&p.final.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wesch, M. (2007). Web 2.0: The machine is us/ing us [Video]. Retrieved June 4, 2007, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOEGoogle Scholar

OTHER REFERENCES

Alexa Web site. (2007). Top sites. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://www.alexa.com/site/ds/top_500Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres & other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87 (1), 156–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrs, M. (1994). Genre theory: What's it all about?. In Stierer, B., & Maybin, J. (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in educational practice. (pp. 248–257). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1977). Images, music, text. New York: Hill and Wang. (Death of the Author essay) Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/threeEssays.html#barthesGoogle Scholar
Bell, M. (2007). The transformation of the encyclopedia: A textual analysis and comparison of the encyclopaedia Britannica and Wikipedia. Unpublished master's thesis, Ball State University, Muncie, IN. Retrieved June 9, 2007, from http://www.storygeek.com/?page_id=85Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, T. (1999). Weaving the Web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Bizzel, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blood, R. (2000). Weblogs: A history and perspective. Retrieved June 10, 2007, from http://www.rebeccablood.net/essays/weblog_history.htmlGoogle Scholar
Blood, R. (2002). Introduction. In Rodzvilla, J. (Ed.), We've got blog: How weblogs are changing our culture. (pp. ix–xiii). Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
Bolter, J. D. (1996). Ekphrasis, virtual reality, and the future of writing. In Nunberg, G. (Ed.), The future of the book (pp. 253–272). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chait, J. (2007, May 7). The left's new machine. The New Republic. Retrieved June 13, 2007, from http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20070507&s=chait050707Google Scholar
Chesney, T. (2006). An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility. First Monday, 11(11). Retrieved June 13, 2007, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_11/chesney/Google Scholar
Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2007). Looking from the inside out: Academic blogging as a new literacy. In Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 167–197). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Elia, A. (2007a). An analysis of Wikipedia digital writing. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 16–21). Retrieved June 10, 2007, from http://www.sics.se/jussi/newtext/Google Scholar
Elia, A. (2007b). Fables and ICT: Intercultural communication and e-language teaching. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 14. Retrieved June 10, 2007, from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fissaha Adafre, S., & de Rijke, M. (2007). Finding similar sentences across multiple languages in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 62–69. Retrieved June 10, 2007, from http://www.sics.se/jussi/newtext/Google Scholar
Flower, L. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41, 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438, 900–901. Retrieved June 10, 2007, from http://www.aetherometry.com/antiwikipedia2/Appendix_1.htmlGoogle Scholar
Graddol, D. (1994). Three models of language description. In Graddol, D. & Boyd-Barrett, O. (Eds.), Media texts: Authors and readers (pp. 1–21). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Harnad, S. (1991). Post-Gutenberg galaxy: The fourth revolution in the means of production and knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2(1), 39–53. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/3376/Google Scholar
Herring, S. C., Kouper, I., Paolillo, J. C., Scheidt, L. A., Tyworth, M., Welsch, P., et al. . (2005). Conversations in the blogosphere: An analysis “from the bottom up.” Proceedings of the 38th Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–11). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press. Retrieved June 6, 2007, from http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceedings/&toc=comp/proceedings/hicss/2005/2268/04/2268toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/HICSS.2005.167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. C., Kouper, I., Scheidt, L. A., & Wright, E. (2004). Women and children last: The discursive construction of weblogs. In Gurak, L., Antonijevic, S., Johnson, L., Ratliff, C., & Reyman, J. (Eds.), Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs [Web site]. Retrieved June 6, 2007, from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/Google Scholar
Herring, S. C., & Paolillo, J. C. (2006). Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 439–459. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00287.xGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Bonus, S., & Wright, E. (2004). Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. Proceedings of the 37th Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–9). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1265271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Kouper, I., & Wright, E. (2006). A longitudinal content analysis of weblogs: 2003–2004. In Tremayne, M. (Ed.), Blogging, citizenship, and the future of media (pp. 3–20). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Holloway, T., Božicevic, M., & Börner, K. (2007). Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authors. Complexity, 12(3), 30–40. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0512085Google Scholar
Howard, J. M. (2005). Blogging politics: A case study of the 2004 elections. Unpublished master's thesis. Georgetown University, Washington, DC. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://dspace.wrlc.org/handle/1961/1384Google Scholar
Kaplan, N. (1995). E-Literacies: Politexts, hypertexts, and other cultural formations in the late age of print. Computer-Mediated Communication Magazine, 2(3), 3–35. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://www.december.com/cmc/mag/1995/mar/kaplan.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kelly, K. (2005). We are the Web. Wired, 13(8), 92–99, 132–133. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.08/tech_pr.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kos Media. (2007). Daily Kos: State of the nation. Retrieved May 21, 2007, from http://www.dailykos.com/Google Scholar
Kramsch, C., A'Ness, F., & Lam, E. (2000). Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 78–104. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num2/kramsch/default.htmlGoogle Scholar
Krause, S. D. (2004). When blogging goes bad: A cautionary tale about blogs, email lists, discussion, and interaction. Kairos, 9.1. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/9.1/praxis/krause/Google Scholar
Landow, G. P. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006, April). Blogging as participation: The active sociality of a new literacy. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. Retrieved June 10, 2007, from http://www.geocities.com/c.lankshear/bloggingparticipation.pdfGoogle Scholar
LeLoup, J. W., & Ponterio, R. (2006). Wikipedia: A multilingual treasure trove. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 4–7. Retrieved June 10, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num2/pdf/net.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lenhart, A., & Fox, S. (2006). Bloggers: A portrait of the Internet's new storytellers. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved June 10, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/186/report_display.aspGoogle Scholar
Lowe, C., & Williams, T. (2004). Moving to the public: Weblogs in the writing classroom. In Gurak, L., Antonijevic, S., Johnson, L., Ratliff, C., & Reyman, J., (Eds.), (Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs [Web site]. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/Google Scholar
Mader, S. (2007). Using wiki in education. Retrieved June 9, 2007, from http://www.wikiineducation.com/display/ikiw/HomeGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. R., & Shepherd, D. (2004). Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/Google Scholar
Miniwatts Marketing Group. (2007). Top 35 countries with the highest Internet penetration rate. Retrieved May 21, 2007, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/top25.htmGoogle Scholar
Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J., & Gumbrecht, M. (2004, November). Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary? Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Work (pp. 222–231). Chicago. Retrieved June 10, 2007, from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1031643&coll=Portal&dl=ACM&CFID=11111111&CFTOKEN=2222222&ret=1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J., Gumbrecht, M., & Swartz, L. (2004). Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 41–46. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=1&hid=17&sid=15cf93c6-ffb9-492c-8311-3c803f1f2233%40sessionmgr2Google Scholar
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1999). Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide. Washington, DC: NTIA. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/acknowledgements.htmlGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, M., Greene, S., & Wiemelt, J. (1993). Where did composition studies come from? An intellectual history. Written Communication, 10 (3), 267–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oladi, S. (2005). Study of Tehran medical students' social interaction in cyber blogging environment and its effect on IELTS writing proficiency. Unpublished masters' thesis. Tehran University, Tehran.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Retrieved June 5, 2007, from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P., & Ang, C. S. (2006). Cultural differences in collaborative authoring of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), 88–113. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00316.x.Google Scholar
Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mvossYCWHX0C&oi=fnd&pg=PP9&dq=poster+%22The+mode+of+information%22&ots=BhpMFKGFut&sig=XObk1dmWFKqOfB1QbzcVcoLLUUsGoogle Scholar
Ravid, G. (2007, June 8). Dominance and social structure in Wikipedia. Paper presented to the Friday Informatics Seminar, Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Read, B. (2006). Can Wikipedia ever make the grade? Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(10), A31. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://chronicle.com/weekly/v53/i10/10a03101.htmGoogle Scholar
Regan, T. (2003, Fall) Weblogs threaten and inform traditional journalism. Nieman Reports. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://nieman.harvard.edu/reports/03-3NRfall/68-70V57N3.pdfGoogle Scholar
Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful Web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
S23. (2007). List of largest (media) wikis. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://s23.org/wikistats/largest_htmlGoogle Scholar
Seigenthaler, J. A. (2005, November 29). False Wikipedia “biography.” USA Today. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htmGoogle Scholar
Shirky, C. (2003). Power laws, Web logs, and inequality. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from http://www.shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.htmlGoogle Scholar
Simple English Wikipedia. (2007a). How to write simple English articles. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_write_Simple_English_articlesGoogle Scholar
Simple English Wikipedia. (2007b). Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Simple_English_Wikipedia.Google Scholar
Stone, B. (2004). Who let the blogs out? A hyperconnected peek at the world of weblogs. New York: St. Martin's Griffin.Google Scholar
Technorati. (2007). Welcome to Technorati. Retrieved June 6, 2007, from http://technorati.com/about/Google Scholar
The Truth Laid Bear. (2007). The TTLB blogosphere ecosystem ranking by traffic. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from http://truthlaidbear.com/TrafficRanking.phpGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme. (1999). Human development report 1999: Globalization with a human face. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/lib.nsf/db900SID/LGEL-5SABRW?OpenDocumentGoogle Scholar
Volosinov, V. N. (1929). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (2005). Weblogs: Learning in public. On the Horizon, 2, 112–218. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewPDF.jsp?Filename=html/Output/Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Pdf/2740130207.pdfGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. (2007a). Web 2.0. Retrieved May 21, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2Google Scholar
Wikipedia. (2007b). Wikipedia: Size comparisons. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_comparisonsGoogle Scholar
Wikipedia Founder. (2006, June 12). Chronicle of higher education. Retrieved June 9, 2007, from http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/1328/wikipedia-founder-discourages-academic-use-of-his-creationGoogle Scholar
Wikitruth. (2007). The cabal. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=The_CabalGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, D. M., & Huberman, B. A. (2007). Assessing the value of cooperation in Wikipedia. First Monday, 12(4). Retrieved December 11, 2007, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_4/wilkinson/Google Scholar
Zamel, V. (1987). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. In Long, M. H., & Richards, J. C. (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings (pp. 267–278). New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar