Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:42:30.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Transfer from Eleusis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2013

Extract

Woodward did a great deal more work on fourth-century Attic treasure-inventories than he ever published, and I still hope to pull some of the notes together. One substantial piece exists in near-publishable shape, and I submit it more readily because it deals with a small fragment recently published by Stroud. I have allowed myself some interventions in the knowledge that Woodward had approved the first in principle and was not opposed to the third.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 184 note 1 Cf. JHS lviii (1938) 70. In my transcript at the end of this note I offer as a possible restoration of the missing letters

page 184 note 2 Griechische Reliefs, pl. X no. 54; but he was mistaken in thinking that Demeter was represented as personifying ‘the Other Gods’ collectively.

page 184 note 3 Über die Athenische Schatzverzeichnisse 121–5.

page 184 note 4 In his commentary on the inscription Kirchner appears undecided, but does not reject the identification.

page 184 note 5 Treasurers of Athena 116 note 1 ad fin.

page 184 note 6 JHS loc. cit. (n. 1) 86–7.

page 185 note 1 Cf., for example, IG ii2. 1396, lines 28–30, silver plate on wood, weighing 1448 drs., JHS, lines 14–19 two gold plates on bronze, weighing 2960 and 2940 drs.

page 187 note 1 [This seems to be an unpublished restoration, depending immediately on IG ii2. 1400, line 37, 1401, line 20, but this kylix can be traced back to fifth-century Eleusis: IG i2. 313, line 43; 314, line 50; 316, line a 1 (in the second and third of these references it is erroneously given the weight of its silver partner, known from the same lines of IG ii2. 1400, 1401).]

page 187 note 2 [Correctly substituted for by Dow, , AJP lxxxiv (1963) 172Google Scholar, where ‘1372’ is a misprint for ‘1375’ (cf. SEG xxi 544).]