² Murray, A. S., Smith, A. H., and Walters, H. B., Excavations in Cyprus (London, 1900), 1–54Google Scholar.

³ Gjerstad, E. et al. The Swedish Cyprus Expedition. Results of the Excavations in Cyprus 1927–1931, i (Stockholm, 1934), 467–575Google Scholar.

⁴ Schaeffer, C. F. A., Missions en Chypre 1932–1935 (Paris, 1936), 83Google Scholar; Kling, 23.

⁵ Enkomi-Alasia, 239–369.

⁶ See Courtois.

⁷ For an overview of the French and Cypriot excavations see Kling, 23–34, 36–40.

⁸ Furumark's term III C 1b, ‘Pottery’, 202–9, cannot be applied to the new subphases of LH III C, defined as a result of excavations at Tiryns, Mycenae, and Lefkandi in the :960s–1990s, since it defines a phase which no longer exists. Dikaios's use of the term dates to before the new definition. The new subphases are used here.

⁹ Dikaios, passim.

¹⁰ See Mountjoy, ‘Dating’.

¹¹ For continuity and for the terminology of locally made Mycenaean style pottery in Cyprus see Kling, B., ‘Local Cypriot features in the ceramics of the Late Cypriot IIIA period’, in Peltenberg, E. (ed.), Early Society in Cyprus (Edinburgh, 1989), 160–70Google Scholar.

¹² Dikaios, 489, uses the term ‘Close Style’. Since the true Mainland Close Style is a miniature style, MDP 155–6, I refer to it as the Pleonastic Style here. See also Kling, 124. The term was first introduced by Schachermeyr, F., ‘The pleonastic pottery style of Cretan Middle IIIC and its Cypriote relations’, in Acts of the International Archaeological Symposium ‘The Relations between Cyprus and Crete, ca 2000–500 BC’ (Nicosia, 1979), 206Google Scholar.

¹³ See Mountjoy, ‘Dating’.

¹⁴ I prefer to use the terms Level III B Early and III B Late as opposed to Dikaios's Level III B(1) and III B(2).

¹⁵ Dikaios, 530.

¹⁶ Ibid., 531.

¹⁷ Ibid., 529.

¹⁸ Blegen, C. W., Boulter, C., Caskey, J. L., and Rawson, M., Troy IV: Settlements VIIa, VIIb and VIII (Princeton, 1958), 142–4Google Scholar.

¹⁹ Dikaios, 131.

²⁰ Ibid., 136.

²¹ Sector E in the east is not included here as no stratigraphy and no LH III C pottery is published from this sector.

²² Dikaios, 148 n.126.

²³ Ibid., 6, 66.

²⁴ My survey of a large number of trays of LH III C material from Enkomi has shown that Dikaios has published examples of all representative decorated sherds from each lot.

²⁵ Dikaios, 137.

²⁶ Ibid., 139.

²⁷ Ibid.

²⁸ Ibid., 148.

²⁹ Ibid., 139.

³⁰ Ibid., 140.

³¹ Ibid., 149–50.

³² Ibid., 490.

³³ Ibid., 140–1.

³⁴ Ibid., 141.

³⁵ Ibid.

³⁶ Ibid., 150.

³⁷ Ibid., 144.

³⁸ Ibid., 142.

³⁹ Ibid., 114, 115.

⁴⁰ Ibid., 144.

⁴¹ Ibid., 115.

⁴² Ibid., 144.

⁴³ Ibid., 150–2.

⁴⁴ Ibid., 618.

⁴⁵ Ibid., 603.

⁴⁶ Ibid., 151.

⁴⁷ Ibid., 199–200.

⁴⁸ Ibid., 219, table.

⁴⁹ Ibid., 200.

⁵⁰ Ibid., 195–9.

⁵¹ Ibid., 194–5.

⁵² Ibid., 194.

⁵³ Ibid., 192–3.

⁵⁴ Ibid., 195–200, followed by Webb, 232.

⁵⁵ Dikaios, 210–11.

⁵⁶ Ibid., 201.

⁵⁷ Ibid., 489.

⁵⁸ Ibid., 206.

⁵⁹ Ibid., pls. 100. 33, 101. 5, 101. 23 respectively.

⁶⁰ Ibid., 206.

⁶¹ No depth is given for this floor.

⁶² Ibid., 207.

⁶³ Ibid., 190.

⁶⁴ Ibid., 207.

⁶⁵ No depth is given for Floor V in Room 41.

⁶⁶ Ibid., pl. 88. 26, 28.

⁶⁷ Ibid., 208.

⁶⁸ Construction of Floor IV at–12.64 and construction of Floor III at –12.40.

⁶⁹ Ibid., 203.

⁷⁰ Ibid., 204–5.

⁷¹ Ibid., 210.

⁷² In the orginal publication the drawings are at different scales; for ease of comparison they have been redrawn here at the same scale (1 : 3) as my drawings of the Enkomi (Dikaios), Kition, and Alaas pottery.

⁷³ See Mountjoy, ‘Dating’.

⁷⁴ Dikaios, 191–2.

⁷⁵ Ibid., 136–7.

⁷⁶ Ibid.

⁷⁷ Ibid.

⁷⁸ See n. 8 for the use of this term.

⁷⁹ Dikaios cites ibid., pl. 80. 31–40, pl. 81. 1–11.

⁸⁰ Ibid., 527–8.

⁸¹ S. Deger-Jalkotzy, in 11th Century, 23.

⁸² Webb, 227–8. She notes that the fusion of Near Eastern attributes with Aegean stylistic features is characteristic of LC II C–III A Cypriot iconography.

⁸³ Dikaios, 212–13, 492.

⁸⁴ Ibid., 219–20.

⁸⁵ Ibid., 492. The presence of several floors in Area III can no longer be used as a criterion of the length of Level III C, since these floors are Level III B Late.

⁸⁶ Ibid., 489.

⁸⁷ MDP 155–6.

⁸⁸ Dikaios, 489.

⁸⁹ Ibid., 490.

⁹⁰ Ibid., pl. 100.16. However, on pl. 306. 145 this sherd is assigned to an earlier phase of Level III A. The same is true of pl. 94. 33, assigned to the destruction of Floor IV Area I Room 14, but on pl. 306. 149 to an earlier phase.

⁹¹ Ibid., pl. 71. 23.

⁹² Ibid., pl. 78. 37.

⁹³ Ibid., pl. 81.

⁹⁴ Ibid., pl. 101. 35.

⁹⁵ Ibid., 490 n. 398.

⁹⁶ Ibid., 282.

⁹⁷ Furumark, ‘Pottery’, 216.

⁹⁸ Dikaios, 490.

⁹⁹ Ibid., 490–1 n. 401.

¹⁰⁰ An examination in the Larnaka depot of the sherd from Level III B Early Area I Room 14 Floors V–IV, ibid., pl. 96. 1, which Dikaios cites, ibid., 326, as the first appearance of wavy line, ascertained that it has not a wavy line but a loop.

¹⁰¹ Ibid., pl. 95. 8, 9.

¹⁰² Kling, 37; Ionas, 57, 58.

¹⁰³ Dikaios, 490–1.

¹⁰⁴ Ibid., 192–9.

¹⁰⁵ Ibid., 196–7.

¹⁰⁶ Ibid., pl. 95. 4.

¹⁰⁷ Ibid., pl. 95. 4. 338.

¹⁰⁸ For this type see Mountjoy, ‘Dating’.

¹⁰⁹ Dikaios, 369.

¹¹⁰ Ibid., pl. 95. 6, 7.

¹¹¹ There is some ambiguity about the existence of Floor II in Room 10. It is not mentioned in the description of Room 10, ibid., 197, but is shown in the table, ibid., 214, and mentioned in the description of Room 9, ibid., 197, and Rooms 9, 10, ibid., 212. It is on the section ibid., pl. 281. 1, but not on the section ibid., pl. 280. 6. In an earlier publication of the sanctuary the floor is present on the sections, P. Dikaios, AA 1962, 14, 16 figs. 8, 9, and is mentioned as being only a slight raising of Floor III, ibid., 23. Perhaps it was put down to cover flood damage. The Horned God, which was found in a pit set down from Floor I into Floor II in Room 10, was first worshipped on the earlier floor in Room 10, that is Floor III with the dumps of bowls.

¹¹² There is almost no real Level III B Late and Level III C pottery published from Area III, apart from a few sherds with wavy line; nearly all the pottery assigned stratigraphically to Level III C, Dikaios, pl. 85, is Level III B Early in date.

¹¹³ Ibid., Room 34 pl. 76. 16, Room 59 pl. 76.26, Room 92 pl. 76. 25.

¹¹⁴ These sherds have been seen by M. Iakovou; she agrees with their classification as PWP.

¹¹⁵ Ibid., 326–7.

¹¹⁶ MP 372–5.

¹¹⁷ The closest earlier examples of reduplicated wavy line come from the East Aegean–West Anatolian Interface; they date to LH III A2, Mountjoy, P. A., Anat. Stud. 48 (1998), 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar and 44 fig. 5 (Kos, Rhodes, Troy); also Iasos Benzi, M., B. d. A. Supp. 31–2 (1985), 33Google Scholar fig. 8 c; they have developed in turn from LB I–II Light-on-Dark and Dark-on-Light vases which were probably manufactured on Kos (Mountjoy, art. cit., 41 fig. 3. 3).

¹¹⁸ RMDP, Argolid nos. 438, 440.

¹¹⁹ Ibid., Argolid nos. 441, 448, Furumark, ‘Pottery’, 209 fig. 3. 10, 14, 211 fig. 4. 1A.

¹²⁰ Caskey, M., in MacGillivray, A. J. and Barber, R. L. N. (eds), The Prehistoric Cyclades (Edinburgh, 1984), 246Google Scholar fig. 4 e, 251 fig. 9 e.

¹²¹ RMDP, Naxos nos. 15, 24, 33, 71. Single undulating wavy lines are also common in the Naxian repertoire Naxos nos. 2–4, 26, 38–9, 55–6, 60, 64–5, 72–3. These vessels are dated stylistically to LH III C Middle as they represent unstratified tomb material, ibid., 939; however, a LH III C Late date cannot be ruled out.

¹²² Meriç, R. and Mountjoy, P. A., Ist Mitt. 52 (2002), 85Google Scholar fig. 3. 11.

¹²³ Kling 37, 81, 83; Ionas, 57–8.

¹²⁴ Dikaios, pl. 107. 1–34.

¹²⁵ See Ionas, 50–62 for the correlations.

¹²⁶ Enkomi-Alasia, 308–9.

¹²⁷ Ibid., 293, 312–14, 358.

¹²⁸ Ibid., 312–14.

¹²⁹ Ibid., 314.

¹³⁰ Ibid., 316.

¹³¹ Ibid., 317, 369.

¹³² Ibid., 363.

¹³³ Schaeffer, C. F. A., ‘Remarks and conclusions’, in Acts of the International Archaeological Symposium ‘The Mycenaeans in the Eastern Mediterranean’, Nicosia 27th March–2nd April 1972 (Nicosia, 1973), 287Google Scholar, states that wavy line was current on Sols IV–I, ‘if I am right’, but he is talking from memory summing up the conference.

¹³⁴ Webb, 70–2.

¹³⁵ Courtois, 200 fig. 46.

¹³⁶ Also Ionas, 64–5, table 2/1–3.

¹³⁷ Courtois, 222 fig. 66.

¹³⁸ Ionas, 61.

¹³⁹ Kling, 38.

¹⁴⁰ Courtois, 220. Below Foyer IV in the South Court a first hearth is mentioned placed on a brown clay floor, which lies on the destruction layer of Sol V, Ibid., fig. 60: U = hearth, T = brown clay floor.

¹⁴¹ Mountjoy, ‘Dating’.

¹⁴² Webb, 76–8.

¹⁴³ Ionas, 61.

¹⁴⁴ Webb, 73; Courtois (n. 6), 166 fig. 15.

¹⁴⁵ Schaeffer, Alasia I, 525–33.

¹⁴⁶ Ionas, 61.

¹⁴⁷ Ibid., 62.

¹⁴⁸ Ibid.

¹⁴⁹ Dikaios, 536.

¹⁵⁰ Kition V, i. 266.

¹⁵¹ Kling, 70.

¹⁵² Ibid., 78.

¹⁵³ Ibid.

¹⁵⁴ Ibid., 79.

¹⁵⁵ Ibid.

¹⁵⁶ Ibid., 72.

¹⁵⁷ Kition V, i. 278.

¹⁵⁸ Ibid., 267.

¹⁵⁹ For an overview of the history of scholarship see Iakovou, 4–13.

¹⁶⁰ Gjerstad, E., ‘The initial date of the Cypriote Iron Age’, Op. Arch. 3 (1944), 73–106Google Scholar, esp. 73–7.

¹⁶¹ Ibid., 75.

¹⁶² Furumark, ‘Pottery’, 243.

¹⁶³ Id., ‘Sinda’, 99–111, 116 n. 3. On the chronological table, ibid., 115, Furumark has listed the appearance of PWP as taking place on Floor II at Enkomi; this floor has much Wavy Line Style pottery.

¹⁶⁴ See Iakovou, M., 11th Century, 152Google Scholar; ead., ‘Proto-White Painted Pottery: a classification of the ware’, in Barlow, J., Bolger, D., Kling, B. (eds), Cypriot Ceramics. Reading the Prehistoric Record (Philadelphia, Pa., 1991), 203Google Scholar.

¹⁶⁵ Furumark, ‘Sinda’, 114.

¹⁶⁶ Dikaios, 494–5.

¹⁶⁷ Gjerstad (n. 160), 92 fig. 5.

¹⁶⁸ Dikaios, 298.

¹⁶⁹ Ibid., 494.

¹⁷⁰ Iakovou, 8. Iakovou has not had access to the material from Sols III–I, apart from one or two pieces, such as the bicephalous figures. I thank M. Iakovou for this information.

¹⁷¹ Ibid., 9.

¹⁷² Kling, 174.

¹⁷³ Kition V, i. 266–7.

¹⁷⁴ e.g. Furumark, ‘Sinda’, 115, chronological table.

¹⁷⁵ Kling, 78, 79.

¹⁷⁶ Iakovou, 1 Section 6.

¹⁷⁷ The absolute dates given are those suggested by French, E., ‘The impact on correlations to the Levant of the recent stratigraphic evidence from the Argolid’, in Bietak, M. (ed.), The Synchronisation of Civilisations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Second Millenium BC: Proceedings of the Second Euro Conference of SCIEM 2000 held at the Austrian Academy in Vienna, May 28th to June 1st, 2003 (Vienna, in press)Google Scholar. The implications of the recently publicized provisional dendrochronological dating from Assiros for Protogeometric on the Greek Mainland are complex and have not been included. See K. Wardle et al., AEMTh, 2003, in press.

¹⁷⁸ Furumark, ‘Sinda’, 115–16.

¹⁷⁹ See Iakovou, 9 with references.

¹⁸⁰ Ionas himself preferred this correlation, Ionas, 62. In his discussion, ibid., 57–8, he has wavy line appearing in Dikaios's Level III B Early, but on his table I he marks ‘Granary Style’ correctly as appearing in Dikaios's Level III B Late.

¹⁸¹ For a definition of LH III C Middle Phase 1 (developed) and Phase 2 (advanced) see MDP 155–80 and, most recently, French, E., Mountjoy, P. A., and Schofield, E. in Deger-Jalkotzy, S. and Zavadil, M. (eds), LHIIIC Chronology and Synchronisms II (Vienna, in press)Google Scholar.

¹⁸² Study of this material was beyond the scope of my present project. Dikaios gave the plain domestic pottery to A. Pieridou, but her MS was not included in the publication for lack of space Dikaios, 825 n. 607.

¹⁸³ For example, Level III A: amphoriskos Dikaios, pl. 75. 37 Area III, feeding bottle pl. 72. 16 Area I, kalathos pl. 74. 2 Area III; Level III B Early: stirrup jar pl. 99. 18 Area I, kylix pl. 95. 10 a Area I; the latter is cited, Kling, 174, as having triangle on the rim typical of PWP, but an examination of the piece in the Larnaka depot showed it is in fact decorated with wavy line.

¹⁸⁴ Webb, 78.

¹⁸⁵ Iakovou, 8.

¹⁸⁶ Dikaios, pl. 82. 27.

¹⁸⁷ Compare, for example, with the ‘Close Style’ krater, ibid., pl. 100. 16.

¹⁸⁸ Asine II. 3, passim.

¹⁸⁹ Lefkandi I, passim.

¹⁹⁰ Mountjoy, P. A., JdI 103 (1988), 1–37Google Scholar.

¹⁹¹ Compare MDP, LH III C Late figs. 249, 254 with Submycenaean figs. 268–9.

¹⁹² The proportions of Subminoan deep bowls, another possible source of influence, are quite different, Coldstream, J. N. and Catling, H. W. (eds), Knossos North Cemetery: Early Greek Tombs (BSA Supp. 28; London, 1996)Google Scholar, ch. 5.

¹⁹³ Asine II. 3, figs. 9. 67–8, 22. 190.

¹⁹⁴ Ibid., figs. 19. 139 a, 36. 358, 56. 499–502.

¹⁹⁵ Ibid., figs. 16. 134–5, 21. 183.

¹⁹⁶ For example Hood, M. S. F., Huxley, G. L., and Sandars, N. K., ‘A Minoan cemetery on Upper Gypsadhes’, BSA 53–4 (1958–1959), 241–3Google Scholar figs. 27 vii. 5, 28 vi.A. 1, 2, 29 vii. 4.

¹⁹⁷ RMDP, Korinthia no. 217.

¹⁹⁸ Ibid., Kos no. 159.

¹⁹⁹ Alasia I, fig. 77.

²⁰⁰ For the attribution to sphinxes rather than centaurs see Webb, 75. M. Iakovou informs me that these figures are bichrome.

²⁰¹ Courtois, 298 fig. 126.

²⁰² RMDP, Attica no. 64.

²⁰³ Alaas, Tombs 16/5, 19/4.

²⁰⁴ Courtois, 293 fig. 123.

²⁰⁵ e.g. RMDP, Korinthia nos. 224–8, Messenia nos. 144, 148, Ithaka nos. 17–19, Attica no. 652, Euboea no. 119, Phthiotis no. 33.

²⁰⁶ e.g. Asine II.3, figs. 60–1.

²⁰⁷ Lefkandi I, pl. 99 T. a4. 1.

²⁰⁸ RMDP, Attica nos. 648–9.

²⁰⁹ Ibid., Attica no. 650.

²¹⁰ Ibid., Attica nos. 609–13.

²¹¹ Asine II. 3, fig. 57. 514.

²¹² Ibid., fig. 58.

²¹³ Ibid., fig. 16. 135.

²¹⁴ Ibid., fig. 35. 352, 353.

²¹⁵ Furumark, ‘Sinda’, 115, table, followed by Ionas, 59.

²¹⁶ Kition V, pl. cxxxix.

²¹⁷ Ibid., pl. xxix. 178/1.

²¹⁸ MDP 156.

²¹⁹ Alasia I, foldout II.

²²⁰ For example Kition V, Area I Floor I pl. lv. 98, lix. 266, Area II Floor II pl. cxlv. 103, 1775, Floors II–I pl. ccxx. 88, Floor I pl. ccxxiv. 181, 3666. All have panelled decoration, except 266, 103, 1775, which have lozenge chain.

²²¹ The interior of 37–8 is not described.

²²² See RMDP 818 and Phthiotis no. 34 for a parallel.

²²³ The handle decoration of 48 is not described.

²²⁴ Kition IV, pls.vi, xiii.

²²⁵ See Iakovou, 34 for this term.

²²⁶ Alasia I, fig. 102. 1010.

²²⁷ Lefkandi I, pl. 95 T. 15 b. 1.

²²⁸ Alasia I, foldout II.

²²⁹ Ibid., 166 fig. 16.

²³⁰ Ibid., 167.

²³¹ Ibid., fig. 40 and foldout II.

²³² Iakovou, 56 n. 6.

²³³ Alasia I, figs. 134, 136–8.

²³⁴ Ibid., fig. 139B.

²³⁵ ibid., fig. 140.

²³⁶ Iakovou, 31.

²³⁷ Ibid., cat. no. 11.

²³⁸ M. Iakovou has suggested to me that the low ring base of the vessel could belong to this shape.

²³⁹ Alaas, T. 15/1,5, T. 17/2,6, T. 19/2,14.

²⁴⁰ Ibid., pl. xii bottom right.

²⁴¹ Ibid. T. 17/25, T. 19/3, 4.

²⁴² MDP, fig. 236.

²⁴³ Mountjoy, P. A., JdI 103 (1988), 11Google Scholar fig. 8 Grave 15 = Kraiker, W. and Kübler, K., Kerameikos I: Die Nekropolen des 12. bis 10.Jahrhunderts (Berlin, 1939)Google Scholar, pl. 17. 432.

²⁴⁴ A second rim Alasia I, fig. 118A top centre has a straight collar neck.

²⁴⁵ Dikaios, pl. 80. 6.

²⁴⁶ Kling, 148.

²⁴⁷ Dikaios, 316.

²⁴⁸ Kling, 151.

²⁴⁹ Alasia I, fig. 102. 1010.

²⁵⁰ Ibid., on foldout II.

²⁵¹ Ibid., fig. 77. 1030.

²⁵² Kling, 160, 173.

²⁵³ Furumark, ‘Pottery’, 234–7.

²⁵⁴ Dikaios, pl. 215. 5.

²⁵⁵ Hadjisavvas, S., ‘LC IIC to LC IIIA without intruders: the case of Alassa-Pano Mandilaris’, in Barlow, et al. (n. 164), 173–80Google Scholar, T. 6. 2.

²⁵⁶ Dikaios, 283.

²⁵⁷ Kling, 15.

²⁵⁸ For the complete shape see later examples from Area II Floor II Kition V, pl. ccxi. 99, 4330.

²⁵⁹ Alasia I, fig. 18F 1069.

²⁶⁰ For a later version of the shape see Iakovou, figs. 90–2.

²⁶¹ Kanta, A., The Late Minoan III Period in Crete (SIMA 58; Göteborg, 1980), figs. 118. 2–5, 119. 1, 3, 5–6, 122. 5Google Scholar.

²⁶² Idalion, 189 fig. 46. 1.

²⁶³ Alasia I, fig. 1.

²⁶⁴ sketch, A., de La Ferté, E. Coche, Essai de classification de la céramique mycénienne d'Enkomi (campagne 1946 et 1947) (Paris, 1951)Google Scholar, pl. ix. 16, shows the type with deep conical shape and small rim diameter.

²⁶⁵ The interior decoration is not described.

²⁶⁶ Alasia I, 298 fig. 126.

²⁶⁷ Iakovou, cat. no. 19.

²⁶⁸ From the photograph Alasia I, fig. 107 the interior base seems to be reserved.

²⁶⁹ Idalion, 189 fig. 46. 2.

²⁷⁰ Alasia I, fig. 139B.

²⁷¹ Kition V, pl. ccxi. 1128.

²⁷² Ibid., pl. ccxxv. 723.

²⁷³ Alasia I, 166 fig. 15.

²⁷⁴ The pottery from Idalion-Ay. Georghios T. 2, Idalion, 185–99, should also be contemporary with that listed here.

²⁷⁵ Iakovou, 9.

²⁷⁶ Ionas, 62.

²⁷⁷ Dikaios, 298–9, 494–5.

²⁷⁸ Iakovou, 1. The fact that the bicephalous figures from Enkomi Sol II are also bichrome (information from M. Iakovou) is a further indication that some of the Alaas material correlates to this horizon at Enkomi.

²⁷⁹ e.g. the stirrup jars, Idalion, 191 fig. 47. 5–8, have the same motif all round the shoulder, whereas some of the Alaas stirrup jars have one motif between spout and handles and a different motif in the zone opposite the spout, Alaas, T. 17/24, T. 19/23, B5, B7, B9–10.

²⁸⁰ For the date see Mountjoy, ‘Dating’.

²⁸¹ Called shaft graves by Sjöqvist, E. S., Problems of the Late Cypriote Bronze Age (Stockholm, 1940), 24–6Google Scholar.