Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:19:37.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Central Places and Major Roads in the Peloponnese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2013

G.D.R. Sanders  and
I.K. Whitbread
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The technique of Graph Theory is described and applied to the ancient road system of the Peloponnese, using the network described in the Peutinger Table, and compared with George Gennadius' map of 1822. The result demonstrates the relative importance of centres in the Peloponnese during the Roman period, and the modification to the pattern of road usage resulting from sea communications. Details of a computer programme for the necessary calculations are given in an appendix.

Type
Articles
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 85 , November 1990 , pp. 333 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 G. Gennadius, Map of the Balkan Peninsula 1822; Leake, W.M., Travels in the Morea I 1830Google Scholar, Frontice piece; Expedition Scientifique de la Morée Paris 1834; Pelet, General, Carte de la Morée, Paris 1832.Google Scholar

2 Haggett, P., Cliff, A.D. and Frey, A., Locational Analysis in Human Geography, Bristol, 1977Google Scholar, provide a useful introduction to Graph Theory and extensive basic bibliography.

3 Garrison, W.L., ‘Connectivity of the Interstate Highway System’, Papers and proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 6 (1960) 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Reed, W.E., ‘Indirect Connectivity and Hierarchies of Urban Dominance’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 60 (1970) 770–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Jones, G.A. et al. , ‘Some Discrete Distributions for Graphs with Applications to Regional Transport Networks’ Geographiska Annaler 52 (1970) 14–21.Google Scholar

6 Haggett, et al. op. cit. 315.

7 Kansky, K.J., ‘Structure of Transport Networks: Relationships between Network Geometry and Regional Characteristics’, University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research Papers 84 (1963) 28–29.Google Scholar

8 Ibid. 21–23.

9 Hu, T.C., Integer Planning and Network Flows. Reading, Mass. 1969 p. 157.Google Scholar For further reading see Potts, R.B. and Oliver, R.M., Flows in Transportation Networks, New York 1972 p. 49ff.Google Scholar

10 T.C. Hu, op. cit. 155.

11 For theories of distance-decay rates and centrality see von Thünen, J.H., Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie Hamburg (1826)Google Scholar and Christaller, W.Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland: Eine ökonomisch-geographische Untersuchung über die Gesetzmässigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischen Funktionen, Jena (1933).Google Scholar Note how accessibility declines with distance from the central point and how points 7, 12, 20, 24, 28 and 31, each two links from node 16, exert their own pull whereas 3, 6, 10, 19, 23 and 27, also two links from node 16, have a lower rank.

12 Stahl, W.H., ‘By their Maps you shall Know them’ Archaeology 8 (1955) 152–3.Google Scholar

13 Jones, A.H.M., The Later Roman Empire II Oxford (1964) 830–834.Google Scholar

14 Miller, K., Itineraria Romana, Stuttgart (1916) 559–571.Google Scholar

15 Pritchett, W.K., Studies in Ancient Topography, III Roads pp. 97–288.Google Scholar

16 Gell, W., Itinerary of the Morea London 1817, 234 for Mistra to KalamataGoogle Scholar; idem. 65–6 for Thuria to Kalamata, and Leake, W.M., Travels in the Morea London (1830) 366–7Google Scholar for Thuria to Mavromati.

17 Gell, op. cit. 60–1, 74–6, 213–20.

18 Pritchett, W.K., Studies in Ancient Greek Topography V Los Angeles 1985, 61–68Google Scholar makes the case for the existence of this route from Sparta to the Stenyklaros plain.

19 Leake, op. cit. I 194–5.

20 Pritchett, III 237–288.

21 Paus. VIII.27.4.

22 Plut. Kleo. 25, Paus. VIII.27.16.

23 Strabo 8.8.1, 16.1.5.

24 For a brief history see Gardner, E.A. et al. , Excavations at Megalopolis, London 1892, 1–5.Google Scholar

25 Paus. 8.45–54.

26 Bon, A.La Morée Franque Paris (1969) 522–25.Google Scholar

27 Williams, C.K., ‘The Refounding of Corinth: Some Religious Attitudes’ in Macready, S. and Thompson, F.H., eds. Roman Architecture in the Greek World, London, 1987 26–37.Google Scholar The politea of Corinth was ager publicus and consequently was worked. The working population and overseers evidently lived in Corinth.

28 Petsas, F. ‘Patrai’ in Stillwell, R. ed. The Princeton Encyclopedia of Classical Sites, New Jersey 1976 861–2.Google Scholar

29 Stahl, op. cit. 153–5. Levi, A.C. and Treil, B. ‘An Ancient Tourist Map’ Archaeology 17 (1964) 227–31Google Scholar however, consider that the vignettes show facilities available to travellers and were not used to identify important cities.

30 G.D.R. and J.M. Sanders, ‘George Finlay in Laconia and Arcadia’ Philolakon forthcoming.

31 Pritchett, III, 54–101 traces the ancient road from Argos to Hysiae and from Tegea to Hysiae. Except for minor details, it follows the same route as that taken by Leake and others.

32 K. Miller, op. cit. LXVII–III.

33 Ibid. 569, fig. 182; Pritchett, Ancient Topography III 257–8.

34 Father of the bibliophile after whom the Athenian library was named.

35 Leake, op. cit. III p.7.

36 Pouqueville, F.C., Travels in the Morea, Albania and Other Parts of the Ottoman Empire London (1813) 118.Google Scholar

37 Idem.Voyage V (1826) 277.

38 Idem.Travels 462–3.

39 Expedition Scientifique de la Morée, Paris 1834.

40 Finlay, G., A History of Greece VI 356–70, 398–400.Google Scholar