Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:00:23.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bronze Coinage and City Life in Central Greece circa A.D. 1000

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2013

Extract

In the decades around the millennium the issues of bronze coinage of the Byzantine Empire, except at Cherson, were exclusively ‘Rex Regnantium’ folles. In accordance with the theocratic political philosophy of the time, the portrait they bore was that not of the emperor but of Christ, ‘the King of those who Rule’. The inscriptions were analogous: Ἐμμανουήλ and Ἰησοῦς Χριστὸς Βασιλεὺς τῶν Βασιλευόντων. Some issues were similar in size and fabric to the earlier issues of the Macedonian dynasty, but others were large, heavy coins, superior to any that had been generally available since the days of Justinian the Great. Quite probably, indeed, they were modelled on the sixth-century folles, as those of Constantine IV certainly had been, with the intention of recalling the glories of the past. The intervening period had witnessed an almost total decline in the circulation of petty currency in the provinces. It is to be seen as evidence of a corresponding decline in city life, for which, in turn, a complex of causes is to be discerned—demographic decline; the Islamic expansion into the eastern provinces and into the coasts and islands of the Mediterranean; the pressure of the Avars, Slavs, and Bulgars in the north-west; the strain imposed on the Byzantine treasury by the military effort expended in containing these threats; provincial self-sufficiency, and lowered standards which necessarily followed from the impoverishment of the state and its peoples. The revival of the Empire's fortunes began in the ninth century, and reached a climax under Basil II (976–1025), who re-established Byzantine rule firmly over territories extending from the Adriatic coasts to the upper valley of the Euphrates. By the end of Basil's reign the use of petty currency, which during the ninth and tenth centuries had still been significantly restricted to a few cities of the Aegean and Black Sea coastlands, was spreading much more widely through the Balkans and Asia Minor. Also, the reconquest of Antioch and the cities of Cilicia added to the needs that the imperial coinage had to meet.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a most interesting discussion of the iconography and political philosophy, see Breckenridge, J. D., The Numismatic Iconography of Justinian II (685–695, 705–711 A.D.) (NNM, no. 144, New York, (1959))Google Scholar, passim.

2 Bellinger, A. R., ‘The Coins and Byzantine Imperial Policy’, Speculum xxxi (1956) 7081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar The issue of large folles by Constantine IV was, for some reason, abortive.

3 Lopez, R. S., ‘The Role of Trade in the Economic Readjustment of Byzantium in the Seventh Century’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers xiii (1959) 76 f. and 77, note 5Google Scholar; G. Ostrogorsky, ‘Byzantine Cities in the Early Middle Ages’, ibid. 45–66; H. B. and others, ‘ B IV—XII BB.’, XIIe Congrès international des études byzantines, Ochride, 1961, Rapports, I, (Belgrade–Ohrid (1961)) 1–44; ibid., Rapports complémentaires, 3–20.

4 Metcalf, D. M., Coinage in the Balkans, 820–1355 (Thessalonica, 1965), 45 f.Google Scholar

5 Bellinger, A. R., The Anonymous Byzantine Bronze Coinage (New York, 1928)Google Scholar.

6 The Athenian Agora II, Thompson, M., Coins from the Roman through the Venetian Period (Princeton, 1954), 73 f.Google Scholar

7 See, for example, Longuet, H., ‘Die uneditierten byzantinischen Münzen des Wiener Kabinettes’, Numismatische Zeitschrift lxxvii (1957) 2857.Google Scholar

8 See Ostrogorsky, G., trans. Hussey, J. M., History of the Byzantine State (Oxford, 1956) 276.Google Scholar

9 Wroth, W., ‘On the Study of Byzantine Coins’, Corolla Numismatica, Numismatic Essays in Honour of Barclay V. Head (Oxford, 1906) 325–35Google Scholar; Catalogue of the Imperial Byzantine Coins in the British Museum (London, 1908), ad loc.

10 M. Thompson, op. cit.

11 Dimian, E. I., ‘Cu privire la cronologia si atribuirea monedelor anonime bizantine de bronz’, Studii şi Cercetări de Numismatică iii (1960) 197221.Google Scholar

12 Whitting, P. D., ‘The Anonymous Byzantine Bronze’, NC 6 xv (1955) 8999.Google Scholar

13 Metcalf, D. M., ‘The Byzantine Bronze Coinage in the East Mediterranean World’, Congresso Internazionale di Numismatica, Roma, 11–16 settembre 1961, vol. ii, 521–30Google Scholar; id., ‘The Coinage of Thessaloniki, 829–1204, and its Place in Balkan Monetary History’, Balkan Studies iv (1963) 277–88.

14 The figure for die-output is a round figure based on researches communicated to meetings of the Royal Numismatic Society recently by B. H. I. H. Stewart and D. Sellwood.

15 Edwards, K. M., Corinth VI, Coins 1896–1929 (Cambridge, Mass., 1932).Google Scholar

16 I am grateful to Professor H. A. Thompson, the Field Director of the Athenian Agora Excavations, who most readily extended all facilities for work in Athens. The study was financed by a Research Award from the British Academy.

17 The coins from the excavations at Sucidava, which are to be published by Mr. B. Mitrea, and those from Thasos should make a useful addition to our knowledge; far more useful would be the full publication of those from Antioch.

18 I am indebted to Professor H. S. Robinson, the Field Director of the Corinth excavations, and to Professor O. Broneer, the excavator, for their permission to publish the hoard. My warmest thanks are owed to Mr. R. Stroud, formerly Secretary of the American School of Classical Studies, who most obligingly took for me the excellent photographs reproduced in the plates.

19 See The Athenian Agora, A Guide to the Excavations and Museum 2 (American School of Classical Studies at Athens) (Athens, 1962): Frantz, M. A., The Middle Ages in the Athenian Agora (Princeton, N.J., 1961)Google Scholar. More detail may be found in the following three articles, which form part of ‘The American Excavations in the Athenian Agora, First Report’, Hesperia ii (1933): E. Capps, ‘Foreword’, 89–95; J. P. Shear, ‘The Coins of Athens’, 231–78, especially 231–33; F. O. Waage III, ‘The Roman and Byzantine Pottery’, 279–328, especially 308–9.

20 M. Thompson, op. cit. 73.

21 The coins are stored in filing-cabinets, each coin in an envelope on which is written a reference and a brief description of the type. The reference, which it is necessary to know in order to be able to locate the coin in the cabinets, is to the place and date of finding; but there is also a systematic card-index.

22 This is widely true throughout the Agora. Although the numbering for this day runs to 52, there are not that number of coins in the Museum, because quite a few disintegrated in cleaning. Occasionally a find that had been given a number turned out not to be a coin at all. The coins conserved are listed with a brief description in the excavators' notebooks. The workmen were paid an extra drachma for each coin they found.

23 Shear, T. L., ‘The Campaign of 1936’, Hesperia vi (1937) 331–81, at 342.Google Scholar

24 The value of χ 2 is 30·2. I am indebted to Dr. Bulmer, of the Unit of Biometry, University of Oxford, who discussed the analysis of the problem and the application of statistical theory with me.

25 The view has found quite frequent expression; see the Guide: M. A. Frantz, The Middle Ages: and, as an example from excavation-reports, Hesperia xxvi (1957) 101.

26 Gregorovius, , Geschichte Athens im Mittelalter (Stuttgart, 1868)Google Scholar; Judeich, W., Topographie von Athen 2 (Munich, 1931) 106Google Scholar; Travlos, I. N., Πολεοδομικὴ ἐξέλιξις τῶν Ἀθηνῶν ἀπὸ τῶν προϊστορικῶν Χρόνων μέχρι τῶν ἀρχῶν τοῦ 19ου μ.Χ. αἰῶνος 19ου μ.Χ. αἰῶνος (Athens, 1960) 150Google Scholar, etc.

27 Scranton, R. L., Corinth XVI, Mediaeval Architecture in the Central Area of Corinth (Princeton, 1957) 135, n. 19.Google Scholar

28 Janin, R., Constantinople byzantine, développement urbain et répertoire topographique (Archives de l'Orient chrétien, IV) (Paris, 1950) 96100.Google Scholar

29 Cedrenus, ii. 475, 482. See Miller, W., Essays on the Latin Orient (Cambridge, 1921) 47.Google Scholar

30 Bellinger, A. R., Catalogue of the Coins Found at Corinth, 1925 (New Haven, 1930)Google Scholar.

31 Waage, D. M., Antioch-on-the-Orontes iv. 2, Greek, Roman, Byzantine, and Crusaders' Coins (Princeton, 1952) 166.Google Scholar

32 Dimian, E. I., ‘Cîteva descoperiri monetare pe teritoriul R.P.R.’, Studii şi Cercetări de Numismatică i (1957) 189216.Google Scholar

33 I am indebted to Mrs. Varoucha-Christodoulopoulou for permission to study the Drosaton hoard, which is now in the National Numismatic Museum at Athens.

34 Cook, J. M. and Nicholls, R. V., ‘Laconia’, BSA xlv (1950) 261–98Google Scholar; cf. BCH lxxv (1951) 105.