¹ RhMus 57 (1902) 539–42, approved by Meyer, E.. Theopomps Hellenika (1909), 266 n.1.Google Scholar

² Mélanges Glotz I (1932), 1–6.

³ LSAG 197.

⁴ IG V. i. 213; DGE 12; Buck 71; LSAG 196–7, 201 n. 52, 407 n. 52. [The dedicatory distich is Hansen, Carmina Epigraphica Graeca I n. 378. The only available photograph of the relief is BSA xiii (1907–8) 174; IG V. i, pl. 2 and LSAG pl. 38. 52 are better for the lettering.]

⁵ Cf. LSAG 60.

⁶ Perhaps the reins were really slackened then, as their turn had to be wider.

⁷ [She noted ABV 369, Leagros Group nn.112–3. 112 was once on display at Sparta as a dedication to Athena Chalkioikos.]

⁸ This was first, as far as I can see, fixed by Tudeer, Die Tetradrachmenprägung von Syrakus (1913). He got it by postulating that the other Sicilian coinages copied Syracuse always, and fast; e.g., Leontinoi fell in 422 or later, and it is on her last issues. Eumenos, Sosion, Euainetos (or, at least, Euain-) went on to c. 414 (or later, if the ‘Assinaros issue’ should in fact be post-414). The dating is accepted by Jenkins, , Coins of Greek Sicily (1966), 19–20Google Scholar, and by Kraay, , Archaic and Classical Greek Coins (1976), 221–2.Google Scholar

⁹ BSA 62 (1967) 19–26.

¹⁰ [For individual Lakonian letter-forms, cf. LSAG, 183–4.]

¹¹ Once in γαιαFοχος, omitted in second reference to the name.

¹² [Cf. Lewis, , in Carradice, (ed.), Coinage and Administration in the Athenian and Persian Empires (1987), 58Google Scholar: ‘very unlike anything we know of from contemporary Laconia’.]

¹³ [For the later date and further discussion, see Cartledge, , LCM 1 (1976) 87–92Google Scholar; further references in SEG XXVIII 408, XXXII 398.]