Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:54:10.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CHARIOT KRATERS AND HORSE–HUMAN RELATIONS IN LATE BRONZE AGE GREECE AND CYPRUS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2021

Laerke Recht Open the ORCID record for Laerke Recht [Opens in a new window]  and
Christine E. Morris Open the ORCID record for Christine E. Morris [Opens in a new window]
Laerke Recht*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Christine E. Morris
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper offers a new comprehensive catalogue and discussion of Late Helladic III chariot kraters, and explores what they reveal about horse–human relations in Greece and Cyprus in the Late Bronze Age. The nearly 400 known examples of chariot kraters were produced in mainland Greece and exported to Cyprus and the Levant. Although the vessels were surely adapted to local contexts, the motif of horses and chariot was part of the ‘international’ spirit of the Late Bronze Age and was meaningful throughout the eastern Mediterranean. Following a discussion of the chronological and geographical distribution of the kraters, alongside notes regarding changes in shape, we examine each of the elements of the characteristic horses-and-chariot motif in depth. This close analysis, supplemented by evidence from faunal remains, Linear B and other visual media, and combined with modern equine knowledge, allows us to understand some of the complexities of horse–human relations in ancient Greece and Cyprus. Through this, we see a co-becoming and mutual training of horse and human in the endeavour to become a successful chariot team; we can also recognise elements of ancient acknowledgement of equine agency and personhood. Horses and humans acted and reacted to each other, thereby living and learning together. The images on the chariot kraters reflect both ancient observation and knowledge of horses and caballine behaviour and artistic conventions and developments. Finally, horses were expensive animals to breed, keep and train (with accompanying expensive gear), and direct physical contact would have been for the fortunate few. The chariot kraters allowed a broader segment of the population to engage with horses and chariots, albeit indirectly.

Κρατήρες με εικονιστική παράσταση αρμάτων και η σχέση ίππου-ανθρώπου στην Ύστερη Εποχή του Χαλκού στην Ελλάδα και την Κύπρο

Η παρούσα μελέτη παρουσιάζει έναν νέο ολοκληρωμένο κατάλογο και συμβάλει στη συζήτηση για τους κρατήρες με εικονιστική παράσταση αρμάτων της Υστεροελλαδικής III, ενώ παράλληλα διερευνά όψεις της σχέσης ίππων και ανθρώπων στην Ελλάδα και την Κύπρο κατά την Ύστερη Εποχή του Χαλκού. Τα σχεδόν 400 γνωστά παραδείγματα κρατήρων με εικονιστική παράσταση αρμάτων κατασκευάστηκαν στον κυρίως ελλαδικό χώρο και εξήχθησαν στην Κύπρο και την Εγγύς Ανατολή. Τα εν λόγω κεραμικά αγγεία συνάδουν βεβαίως με τα τοπικά τους περιβάλλοντα, εντούτοις η απεικόνιση αρμάτων αποτέλεσε μέρος του «διεθνούς» πνεύματος της Ύστερης Εποχής του Χαλκού και είχε νόημα για τους λαούς ολόκληρης της Ανατολικής Μεσογείου. Κατόπιν της συζήτησης γύρω από τη χρονολογική και γεωγραφική κατανομή των κρατήρων και των αλλαγών του σχηματολογίου τους, ακολουθεί η ενδελεχής εξέταση χαρακτηριστικών παραστάσεων αρμάτων. Αυτή η λεπτομερής ανάλυση, η οποία συμπληρώνεται από άλλα δεδομένα, όπως τα οστεολογικά κατάλοιπα, η Γραμμική B και άλλα εικονιστικά τεκμήρια, καθώς και η σύγχρονη γνώση περί των ιπποειδών, μάς επιτρέπει την κατανόηση κάποιων από τις πολυπλοκότητες της σχέσης ίππων και ανθρώπων στην αρχαία Ελλάδα και την Κύπρο. Μέσα από την προσέγγιση αυτήν, είμαστε σε θέση να αντιληφθούμε καλύτερα τη συνύπαρξη και «συνεκπαίδευση» αλόγων και ανθρώπων στη διαδικασία ανάδειξής τους σε μία επιτυχημένη ομάδα άρματος, ενώ παράλληλα μπορούμε να αναγνωρίσουμε στοιχεία της αρχαίας επίγνωσης της προσωπικότητας των ίππων. Ίπποι και άνθρωποι συνυπάρχουν, συνδιαλέγονται και συνεκπαιδεύονται. Οι εικονιστικές παραστάσεις αρμάτων αντικατοπτρίζουν τόσο την αρχαία γνώση των ίππων και της συμπεριφοράς τους, όσο και τις σχετικές καλλιτεχνικές συμβάσεις και εξελίξεις. Τέλος, η εκτροφή, αναπαραγωγή και εκπαίδευση των ίππων (μαζί με τον σχετιζόμενο εξοπλισμό τους) υπήρξαν ιδιαίτερα δαπανηρές δραστηριότητες, ως εκ τούτου, η άμεση φυσική επαφή με την κατηγορία αυτή των ζώων ήταν μάλλον πλεονέκτημα των λίγων και ευνοούμενων. Οι κρατήρες με παραστάσεις αρμάτων επέτρεπαν, κατά κάποιον τρόπο, σε όλες τις πληθυσμιακές ομάδες την εξοικείωση με ίππους και άρματα, έστω και με έμμεσο τρόπο.

Type
Articles
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 116 , December 2021 , pp. 95 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Åkerström, Å. 1987. Berbati, vol. 2: The Pictorial Pottery (Stockholm).Google Scholar
Albright, W.F. 1930–1. ‘Mitannian maryannu, “chariot warriors”, and the Canaanite and Egyptian equivalents’, AfO 6, 217–21.Google Scholar
Argent, G. 2013. ‘Inked: human–horse apprenticeship, tattoos, and time in the Pazyryk world’, Society & Animals 21.2, 178–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argent, G. 2016. ‘Killing (constructed) horses – interspecies elders, empathy and emotion, and the Pazyryk horse sacrifices’, in Broderick, L.G. (ed.), People with Animals: Perspectives and Studies in Ethnozooarchaeology (Oxford and Philadelphia, PA), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong Oma, K. 2010. ‘Between trust and domination: social contracts between humans and animals’, WorldArch 42.2, 175–87.Google Scholar
Bar-Oz, G., Nahshoni, P., Motro, H. and Oren, E.D. 2013. ‘Symbolic metal bit and saddlebag fastenings in a Middle Bronze Age donkey burial’, PLoS ONE 8.3, e58648.Google Scholar
Bennet, J. 2017. ‘Prosilio – 2017’, Ministry of Culture & Sports Press, 9 November 2017.Google Scholar
Benzi, M. 1999. ‘Riti di passggio sulla larnax dalla Tomba 22 di Tanagra?’, in La Rosa, V., Palermo, D. and Vagnetti, L. (eds), ἐπὶ πόντον πλαζόμενοι: Simposio italiano di Studi Egei (Rome), 215–33.Google Scholar
Boessneck, J. and Driesch, A. von den, . 1984. ‘Die zoologische Dokumentation der Reste von vier Pferden und einem Hund aus einem mykenischen Schachtgrab in Kokla bei Argos (Peloponnes)’, Spixiana 7.3, 327–33.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. 2017. ‘Archaeology and human–animal relations: thinking through Anthropocentrism’, Annual Review of Anthropology 46.1, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, B. 2005. ‘Materialization of Mycenaean ideology and the Ayia Triada sarcophagus’, AJA 109.3, 403–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catling, H.W. and Karageorghis, V. 1960. ‘Minoika in Cyprus’, BSA 55, 108–27.Google Scholar
Chapin, A.P. 2004. ‘Power, privilege and landscape in Minoan art’, in Chapin, A.P. (ed.), ΧΑΡΙΣ: Essays in Honor of Sara A. Immerwahr (Hesperia Supplements 33; Princeton, NJ), 47–64.Google Scholar
Courtois, J.-C. 1984. Alasia III: Les Objets des niveaux stratifiés d'Enkomi (Mission Archéologique d'Alasia 6; Paris).Google Scholar
Croft, P.W. 2017. ‘The animal remains from Alassa’, in Hadjisavvas, S., Alassa: Excavations at the Late Bronze Age Sites of Pano Mantilaris and Paliotaverna 1984–2000 (Nicosia), 519–37.Google Scholar
Crouwel, J.H. 1981. Chariots and Other Means of Land Transport in Bronze Age Greece (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Crouwel, J.H. and Morris, C.E. 1985. ‘Mycenaean pictorial pottery from Tell Atchana (Alalakh)’, BSA 80, 85–98.Google Scholar
Crouwel, J.H. and Morris, C.E. 1995. ‘Pictorial pottery of Late Minoan II–III A2 Early from Knossos’, BSA 90, 157–82.Google Scholar
Crouwel, J.H. and Morris, C.E. 2015. ‘The Minoan amphoroid krater: from production to consumption’, BSA 110, 147–201.Google Scholar
Davis, J.L. and Stocker, S.R. 2016. ‘The Lord of the Gold Rings: the Griffin Warrior of Pylos’, Hesperia 85.4, 627–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, J. 2006. ‘Flower lovers? Reconsidering the gardens of Minoan Crete’, in Morel, J.-P., Juan, J.T. and Matamala, J.C. (eds), The Archaeology of Crop Fields and Gardens (Bari), 189–95.Google Scholar
Dikaios, P. 1971. Enkomi Excavations 1948–1958, vol. 2: Chronology, Summary and Conclusions, Catalogue, Appendices (Mainz am Rhein).Google Scholar
Dolce, R. 2014. ‘Equids as luxury gifts at the centre of interregional economic dynamics in the archaic urban cultures of the ancient Near East’, Syria 91, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driessen, J. 1996. ‘The arsenal of Knossos (Crete) and Mycenaean chariot forces’, in Lodewijckx, M. (ed.), Archaeological and Historical Aspects of West-European Societies: Album Amicorum André Van Doorselaer (Leuven), 481–98.Google Scholar
Driessen, J. 2008. ‘Chronology of the Linear B texts’, in Duhoux, Y. and Morpurgo Davies, A., A Companion to Linear B: Mycenaean Greek Texts and their World (Leuven), 69–79.Google Scholar
Feldman, M.H. and Sauvage, C. 2010. ‘Objects of prestige? Chariots in the Late Bronze Age eastern Mediterranean and Near East’, Egypt and the Levant 20, 67–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, P.M. and Bürge, T. 2014. ‘The New Swedish Cyprus Expedition 2013: excavations at Hala Sultan Tekke’, OpAthRom 7, 61–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, P.M. and Bürge, T. 2017. ‘Tombs and offering pits at the Late Bronze Age metropolis of Hala Sultan Tekke, Cyprus’, BASOR 378, 1–106.Google Scholar
Furtwängler, A. and Loeschke, G. 1886. Mykenische Vasen: Vorhellenische Thongefässe aus dem Gebiete des Mittelmeeres (Berlin).Google Scholar
Furumark, A. 1941. The Mycenaean Pottery: Analysis and Classification (Stockholm).Google Scholar
Güntner, W. 2000. Figürlich bemalte Mykenische Keramik aus Tiryns (Tiryns 12; Mainz am Rhein).Google Scholar
Güntner, W. 2006. ‘Mycenaean pictorial vase painters: a view from Tiryns’, in Rystedt, E. and Wells, B. (eds), Pictorial Pursuits: Figurative Painting on Mycenaean and Geometric Pottery (Stockholm), 51–61.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet (Minneapolis, MN).Google Scholar
Harding, A. 2005. ‘Horse-harness and the origins of the Mycenaean civilisation’, in Dakouri-Hild, A. and Sherratt, S. (eds), Autochthon: Papers Presented to O.T.P.K. Dickinson on the Occasion of his Retirement (Oxford), 296–300.Google Scholar
Harris, K. and Hamilakis, Y. 2014. ‘Beyond the wild, the feral and the domestic’, in Marvin, G. and McHugh, S. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Human–Animal Studies (London), 97–113.Google Scholar
Herva, V.-P. 2006. ‘Flower lovers, after all? Rethinking religion and human-environment relations in Minoan Crete’, WorldArch 38.4, 586–98.Google Scholar
Iacovou, M. 2006. ‘À contretemps: Late Helladic IIIC syntax and context of Early Iron Age pictorial pottery in Cyprus’, in Rystedt, E. and Wells, B. (eds), Pictorial Pursuits: Figurative Painting on Mycenaean and Geometric Pottery (Stockholm), 191–203.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, S.A. 1990. Aegean Painting in the Bronze Age (University Park, PA).Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 1988. ‘The animal in the study of humanity’, in Ingold, T. (ed.), What Is an Animal? (London), 84–99.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. 2017. ‘The fine and plain ware pottery from Alassa’, in Hadjisavvas, S., Alassa: Excavations at the Late Bronze Age Sites of Pano Mantilaris and Paliotaverna 1984–2000 (Nicosia), 386–450.Google Scholar
Jones, B.R. 2015. Ariadne's Threads: The Construction and Significance of Clothes in the Aegean Bronze Age (Aegaeum 38; Leuven and Liège).Google Scholar
Jonsson, L. 1983. ‘Animal and human bones from the Bronze Age settlement at Hala Sultan Tekke’, in Åström, P., Åström, E., Hatziantoniou, A., Niklasson, K. and Öbrink, U. (eds), Hala Sultan Tekke, vol. 8: Excavations 1971–1979 (Gothenburg), 222–46.Google Scholar
Karageorghis, V. 1958. ‘Myth and epic in Mycenaean vase painting’, AJA 62.4, 383–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karo, G. 1930–3. Schachtgräber von Mykenai (Munich).Google Scholar
Keswani, P. 1989. ‘Mortuary ritual and social hierarchy in Bronze Age Cyprus’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Michigan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keswani, P. 2004. Mortuary Ritual and Society in Bronze Age Cyprus (London).Google Scholar
Knapp, A.B. 1986. Copper Production and Divine Protection: Archaeology, Ideology, and Social Complexity on Bronze Age Cyprus (Gothenburg).Google Scholar
Kosmetatou, E. 1993. ‘Horse sacrifices in Greece and Cyprus’, JPR 7, 31–41.Google Scholar
Langdon, S. 1989. ‘The return of the horse-leader’, AJA 93.2, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, A. 1994. An Index to the Late Bronze Age Aegean Pottery from Syria-Palestine (Jonsered).Google Scholar
Littauer, M.A. and Crouwel, J.H. 1979. Wheeled Vehicles and Ridden Animals in the Ancient Near East (Leiden).Google Scholar
Littauer, M.A. and Crouwel, J.H. 2002. Selected Writings on Chariots and Other Early Vehicles, Riding and Harness, ed. Raulwing, P. (Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, C.R. 1974. The Ayia Triadha Sarcophagus: A Study of Late Minoan and Mycenaean Funerary Practices and Beliefs (SIMA 41; Gothenburg).Google Scholar
Lorimer, H.L. 1950. Homer and the Monuments (London).Google Scholar
Maiuri, A. 1923–4. ‘Jalisos: scavi della missione archeologica italiana a Rodi’, ASAtene 6–8, 83–341.Google Scholar
Mommsen, H. and Maran, J. 2000–1. ‘Production places of some Mycenaean pictorial vessels: the contribution of chemical pottery analysis’, OpAth 25–6, 95–106.Google Scholar
Moran, W.L. 1992. The Amarna Letters (Baltimore, MD).Google Scholar
Morris, B. 2000. The Power of Animals: An Ethnography (Oxford and New York).Google Scholar
Morris, C.E. 1989. ‘The Mycenaean amphoroid krater: a study in form, design and function’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University College London).Google Scholar
Morris, C.E. 1990. ‘In pursuit of the white tusked boar: aspects of hunting in Mycenaean society’, in Hägg, R. and Nordquist, G. (eds), Celebrations of Death and Divinity in the Bronze Age Argolid (Stockholm), 149–56.Google Scholar
Morris, C.E. 1993. ‘Hands up for the individual: the role of attribution studies in Aegean prehistory’, CAJ 3.1, 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C.E. 2001. ‘The language of gesture in Minoan religion’, in Laffineur, R. and Hägg, R. (eds), Potnia: Deities and Religion in the Aegean Bronze Age. Proceedings of the 8th International Aegean Conference (Aegaeum 22; Liège), 245–51.Google Scholar
Morris, C.E. 2006. ‘Design element analysis of Mycenaean chariot kraters’, in Rystedt, E. and Wells, B. (eds), Pictorial Pursuits: Figurative Painting on Mycenaean and Geometric Pottery (Stockholm), 97–106.Google Scholar
Mountjoy, P.A. 1986. Mycenaean Decorated Pottery: A Guide to Identification (Gothenburg).Google Scholar
Mountjoy, P.A. 1999. Regional Mycenaean Decorated Pottery (Rahden).Google Scholar
Myres, J.L. 1914. Handbook of the Cesnola Collection of Antiquities from Cyprus (New York).Google Scholar
Oates, J. 2003. ‘A note on the early evidence for horse and the riding of equids in western Asia’, in Levine, M., Renfrew, C. and Boyle, K. (eds), Prehistoric Steppe Adaptation and the Horse (Cambridge), 115–25.Google Scholar
Overton, N.J. and Hamilakis, Y. 2013. ‘A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology: swans and other beings in the Mesolithic’, Archaeological Dialogues 20.2, 111–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palaima, T. 1992. ‘Mycenaean scribal aesthetics’, in Laffineur, R. and Crowley, J.L. (eds), EIKON. Aegean Bronze Age Iconography: Shaping a Methodology. Proceedings of the 4th International Aegean Conference, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, 6–9 April 1992 (Liège), 63–75.Google Scholar
Pappi, E. and Isaakidou, V. 2015. ‘On the significance of equids in the Late Bronze Age Aegean: new and old finds from the cemetery of Dendra in context’, in Schallin, A.-L. and Tournavitou, I. (eds), Mycenaeans up to Date: The Archaeology of the Northeastern Peloponnese – Current Concepts and New Directions (Stockholm), 469–81.Google Scholar
Paribeni, R. 1908. ‘Il sarcofago dipinto di Haghia Triada’, Monumenti antichi pubblicati per cura della reale accademia dei lincei 19, 5–86.Google Scholar
Payne, S. 1990. ‘Appendix: field report on the Dendra horses’, in Hägg, R. and Nordquist, G. (eds), Celebrations of Death and Divinity in the Bronze Age Argolid (Stockholm), 103–6.Google Scholar
Pilaar Birch, S.E. (ed.) 2018. Multispecies Archaeology (Abingdon and New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porada, E. 1988. ‘Relief friezes and seals from Maa-Palaeokastro’, in Karageorghis, V. and Demas, M., Excavations at Maa-Palaeokastro 1979–1986 (Nicosia), 301–14.Google Scholar
Preziosi, D. and Hitchcock, L. 1999. Aegean Art and Architecture (Oxford).Google Scholar
Proops, L., Grounds, K., Smith, A.V. and McComb, K. 2018. ‘Animals remember previous facial expressions that specific humans have exhibited’, Current Biology 28.9, 1428–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raulwing, P. 2000. Horses, Chariots and Indo-Europeans: Foundations and Methods of Chariotry Research from the Viewpoint of Comparative Indo-European Linguistics (Budapest).Google Scholar
Recht, L. 2018. ‘“Asses were buried with him”: equids as markers of sacred space in the third and second millennia bc in the eastern Mediterranean’, in Nebelsick, L.D., Wawrzeniuk, J. and Zeman-Wiśniewska, K. (eds), Sacred Space: Contributions to the Archaeology of Belief (Archaeologica Hereditas 13; Warsaw), 65–94.Google Scholar
Recht, L. 2019. ‘Animals as social actors: cases of equid resistance in the ancient Near East’, CAJ 29.4, 593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reese, D.S. 1995. ‘Equid sacrifices/burials in Greece and Cyprus: an addendum’, JPR 9, 35–42.Google Scholar
Reese, D.S. 2007. ‘Faunal remains from Hala Sultan Tekke tombs’, in Åström, P. and Nys, K. (eds), Hala Sultan Tekke 12: Tomb 24, Stone Anchors, Faunal Remains and Pottery Provenance (Sävedalen), 50–2.Google Scholar
Reese, D.S. 2018. ‘Faunal evidence: catalogues, worked bones, ivory, horn, shells’, in Fischer, P.M. and Bürge, T. (eds), Two Late Cypriot City Quarters at Hala Sultan Tekke: The Söderberg Expedition 2010–2017 (Uppsala), 493–563.Google Scholar
Reviv, H. 1972. ‘Some comments on the maryannu’, IEJ 22.4, 218–28.Google Scholar
Ritvo, H. 2004. ‘Animal planet’, Environmental History 9, 204–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodenwaldt, G. 1912. Tiryns: Die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen des Instituts (Athens).Google Scholar
Russell, N. (ed.) 2011. Social Zooarchaeology: Humans and Animals in Prehistory (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rystedt, E. 1987. ‘Oxhide ingots or camp stools? Notes on a motif in Mycenaean pictorial vase painting’, RDAC, 49–55.Google Scholar
Rystedt, E. 1990. ‘On distinguishing hands in Mycenaean pictorial vase painting’, OpAth 18, 167–76.Google Scholar
Sakellariou, A. 1964. Die minoischen und mykenischen Siegel des Nationalmuseums in Athen (CMS 1; Berlin).Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C.F.-A. 1936–7. ‘Sur un cratère mycénien de Ras Shamra’, BSA 37, 212–35.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C.F.-A. 1938. ‘Les Fouilles de Ras Shamra-Ugarit’, Syria 19.4, 313–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, C.F.-A. 1939. Ugaritica I (Mission de Ras Shamra 3; Paris).Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C.F.-A. (ed.) 1978. Ugaritica VII (Mission de Ras Shamra 18; Paris).Google Scholar
Schallin, A.-L. 1997. ‘The Late Bronze Age potter's workshop at Mastos in the Berbati valley’, in Gillis, C., Risberg, C. and Sjöberg, B. (eds), Trade and Production in Premonetary Greece: Acquisition and Distribution of Raw Materials and Finished Products, Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop (Jonsered), 73–88.Google Scholar
Schliemann, H. 1886. Tiryns. Der prähistorische Palast der Könige von Tiryns: Ergebnisse der neuesten Ausgrabungen (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Schon, R. 2007. ‘Chariots, industry, and elite power at Pylos’, in Galaty, M.L. and Parkinson, W.A. (eds), Rethinking Mycenaean Palaces II: Revised and Expanded Second Edition (Los Angeles, CA), 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapland, A. 2010. ‘Wild nature: human–animal relations on Neopalatial Crete’, CAJ 20.1, 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapland, A. 2013. ‘Shifting horizons and emerging ontologies in the Bronze Age Aegean’, in Watts, C. (ed.), Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things (London), 190–208.Google Scholar
Sherratt, S. 1999. ‘E pur si muove: pots, markets and values in the second millennium Mediterranean’, in Gillis, C., Risberg, C. and Sjöberg, B. (eds), The Complex Past of Pottery: Production, Circulation and Consumption of Mycenaean and Greek Pottery (Sixteenth to Early Fifth Centuries bc) (Amsterdam), 163–210.Google Scholar
Slenczka, E. 1974. Figürlich bemahlte Mykenische Keramik aus Tiryns (Tiryns 7; Mainz am Rhein).Google Scholar
Smith, A.V., Proops, L., Grounds, K., Wathan, J. and McCombs, K. 2016. ‘Functionally relevant responses to human facial expressions of emotion in the domestic horse (Equus caballus)’, Biology Letters 12.2, 1–4.Google Scholar
Spyropoulos, T.G. 2015. ‘Wall paintings from the Mycenaean palace of Boiotian Orchomenos’, in Brecoulaki, H., Davis, J.L. and Stocker, S.R. (eds), Mycenaean Wall Painting in Context: New Discoveries, Old Finds Reconsidered (Athens), 354–68.Google Scholar
Steel, L. 1998. ‘The social impact of Mycenaean imported pottery in Cyprus’, BSA 93, 285–96.Google Scholar
Steel, L. 2004. ‘A goodly feast … a cup of mellow wine: feasting in Bronze Age Cyprus’, Hesperia 73.2, 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, L. 2006. ‘Women in Mycenaean pictorial vase painting’, in Rystedt, E. and Wells, B. (eds), Pictorial Pursuits: Figurative Painting on Mycenaean and Geometric Pottery (Stockholm), 147–55.Google Scholar
Steel, L. 2020. ‘“Little women”: gender, performance, and gesture in Mycenaean female figurines’, JAnthArch 58, 1–18.Google Scholar
Thaler, U. and Vetters, M. 2018. ‘All the king's horses’, in Vlachopoulos, A.G. (ed.), Paintbrushes: Wall-Painting and Vase-Painting of the Second Millennium bc in Dialogue (Athens), 465–93.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. and Wedde, M. 2001. ‘Desperately seeking Potnia’, in Laffineur, R. and Hägg, R. (eds), Potnia: Deities and Religion in the Aegean Bronze Age. Proceedings of the 8th International Aegean Conference (Aegaeum 22; Liège), 3–14.Google Scholar
Tournavitou, I. 2015. ‘Sport, prestige, and ritual outside the palaces: pictorial frescoes from the West House at Mycenae’, in Brecoulaki, H., Davis, J.L. and Stocker, S.R. (eds), Mycenaean Wall Painting in Context: New Discoveries, Old Finds Reconsidered (Athens), 144–69.Google Scholar
Tournavitou, I. and Brecoulaki, H. 2015. ‘The Mycenaean wall paintings from Argos: a preliminary presentation’, in Brecoulaki, H., Davis, J.L. and Stocker, S.R. (eds), Mycenaean Wall Painting in Context: New Discoveries, Old Finds Reconsidered (Athens), 212–45.Google Scholar
Vandenabeele, F. and Olivier, J.-P. 1979. Les Idéogrammes archéologiques du Linéaire B (Paris).Google Scholar
Ventris, M. and Chadwick, J. 1973. Documents in Mycenaean Greek, 2nd edn (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Vermeule, E. 1964. Greece in the Bronze Age (Chicago, IL).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeule, E. and Karageorghis, V. 1982. Mycenaean Pictorial Vase Painting (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Vlachopoulos, A. 2015. ‘Detecting “Mycenaean” elements in the “Minoan” wall paintings of a “Cycladic” settlement: the wall paintings at Akrotiri, Thera within their iconographic koine’, in Brecoulaki, H., Davis, J.L. and Stocker, S.R. (eds), Mycenaean Wall Painting in Context: New Discoveries, Old Finds Reconsidered (Athens), 36–65.Google Scholar
Wachsmann, S. 2009. Seagoing Ships and Seamanship in the Bronze Age Levant (College Station, TX).Google Scholar
Waring, G. 2003. Horse Behavior, 2nd edn (Norwich, NY).Google Scholar
Way, K. 2010. ‘Assessing sacred asses: Bronze Age donkey burial in the Near East’, Levant 42.2, 210–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, J. 2008. ‘Elite equids: redefining equid burials of the mid- to late 3rd millennium bc from Umm el-Marra, Syria’, in Vila, E., Gourichon, L., Choyke, A.M. and Buitenhuis, H. (eds), Archaeozoology of the Near East VIII: actes des huitièmes Rencontres internationales d'Archéozoologie de l'Asie du Sud-Ouest et des régions adjacentes (Lyon), 499–519.Google Scholar
Weber, J. 2017. ‘Elite equids 2: seeing the dead’, in Mashkour, M. and Beech, M.J. (eds), Archaeozoology of the Near East IX: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Aswa (AA) Working Group: Archaeozoology of Southwest Asia and Adjacent Areas (Oxford), 340–62.Google Scholar
Wedde, M. 1999. ‘Talking hands: a study of Minoan and Mycenaean ritual gesture – some preliminary notes’, in Betancourt, P.P., Karageorghis, V., Laffineur, R. and Niemeier, W.-D. (eds), Meletemata: Studies in Aegean Archaeology Presented to Malcolm H. Wiener as he Enters his 65th Year (Aegaeum 20; Liège and Austin, TX), 911–20.Google Scholar
Wiesner, J. 1959. ‘Die Hochzeit des Polypus’, JdI 74, 35–51.Google Scholar
Wijngaarden, G. J. van. 2002. Use and Appreciation of Mycenaean Pottery in the Levant, Cyprus and Italy (1600–1200 bc) (Amsterdam).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willerslev, R. 2007. Soul Hunters: Hunting, Animism, and Personhood among the Siberian Yukaghirs (Berkeley, CA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J.C. 2014. ‘Sport in the Aegean Bronze Age’, in Christesen, P. and Kyle, D.G. (eds), A Companion to Sport and Spectacle in Greek and Roman Antiquity (Oxford), 36–52.Google Scholar
Zarins, J. 1986. ‘Equids associated with human burials in third millennium bc Mesopotamia: two complementary facets’, in Meadow, R.H. and Uerpmann, H.-P. (eds), Equids in the Ancient World (Wiesbaden), 164–93.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Recht and Morris supplementary material

Recht and Morris supplementary material

Download Recht and Morris supplementary material(File)
File 118 KB