^{page 108 note *} The last letter in the uncial text looked like Γ tilted a little forward; it has been represented as A by a mistake.

^{page 108 note †} The copy exaggerates the size of the letters in the first two lines; they are only slightly larger than the rest.

^{page 108 note ‡} Dittenberger, Hermes, vi. 310; S. Reinach, Traitié d'Epigr. Gr., p. 520.

^{page 109 note *} θιασώτης ὁ κοινωνὸς τῶν θυσιῶν ἐκαλοῦντο δὲ καὶ οὖτος ᾿Οργεῶνες Bekker's Anekdota, p. 264, 23. On the organisation of these associations see M. Foucart, Des Assoc. relig. chez les Grecs, p. 42 ff.

^{page 109 note †} Cp. for example, C. I. A. ii. 168, C. 1. G. 2271, &c. Others would, of course, be subsequently admitted. One of the distinctive features of such associations, however, was the admission of foreigners, as well as women, and even slaves, to membership.

^{page 109 note ‡} θήβων, θηβάδης, Εργων, Νεάρετος Οἰνάνθης and Φθόγγος are unknown to Pape-Benseler (last ed.), while Τμῶλος and Χάων occur only as heroic names.

^{page 110 note *} From Troizen it was carried to Halicarnassos and Myndos (Strabo, pp. 374, 656; Paus. ii. 30, 9; Steph. Byz., s. v. ῾Αλικαρνασσὸς and ᾿Αθῆναι and ᾿Αθῆναι Cp. C. I. G., 2655). It perhaps also existed at Anthana in Laconia (Steph. s. v.).

^{page 110 note †} Aristotle ap. Plut. Quast. Gr. 19 and Athen. I., p. 31 c; he gives the form ᾿Ανθηδονία while the oracle which he is explaining has ᾿Ανθηδών

^{page 110 note ‡} Ἐφ. Ἀρχ. 1892, p. 49 (dating ca. 278 B.c.), emended by Diels, Arch. Anz. in Jahrbuch, 1893, p. 138 (Cp. also Zft. f. d. ösi. Gymn., 1893, p. 1074).

^{page 110 note §} Paus, ix., 22, Steph., s. v.

^{page 110 note ║} See the excellent paper of Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, Die Amphiktionie von Kalaurea (in Nachrichten d. K. Gesell, d. Wiss. zu Gött., 1896, Heft 2). Starting from an inscription found during the Swedish excavations at Kalaureia (Ath. Mitth., 1895, p. 295), he gives the best explanation of this ἀμφικτιονία rightly rejecting the theory of a Mycenaean maritime league.

^{page 111 note *} At Halicarnassos ᾿Ανθεάδαι was the name of the family which held the priesthood of the Poseidon cult brought from Troizen (cp. C I. G. 2655).

^{page 111 note †} Thuc. viii. 10; Plut. Thes. c. 25.

^{page 111 note ‡} Herod, vi. 87, cp. C I. A., i. 196.

^{page 111 note §} C. I. A. 269, Paus. i. 37, 2.

^{page 111 note ║} This reference was given me by Mr. Cecil Smith. The entry immediately preceding is imperfect [. . . . . .]ῳ κριὸς Δ it would be worth while examining the stone to see if [Διῖ Κεραι]ῷ might be restored.

^{page 111 note ¶} Ποσειδῶνα (at Troizen)… ῷ καὶ καρπῶν ἀπἄρχονται καὶ τρίαιναν ἐπίσημον ἔχουσι τοῦ νομίσματος Plut. Thes. c. 6. On this cult, see Preller-Robert, Griech. Myth., p. 586.

^{page 111 note **} The form of the name varies between ᾿´Ανθας (Paus. ii. 30, ix. 22), ᾿´Ανθης (Strabo, pp. 374, 656; Plut. Quaest. Gr. 19 and Athen, i. p. 31c, where he is connected with the vine), ᾿´Ανθος (Plut. l.c.), and ᾿´Ανθιος (Schol, to Hom. Il. ii. 508).

^{page 111 note ††} Cp. Toepffer in Pauly-Wissowa, Real-Encyc. p. 2359, s.v. Antheadai.

^{page 111 note ‡‡} Cp. Amer. Journ. Arch., l.c. (and p. 214).

^{page 112 note *} They have now been published as an appendix to C.I.A. by Wünsch (1897).

^{page 113 note *} 408 B.C.—He points out that these may be enfranchised foreigners, as belonging to the deme Peiraeus.

^{page 114 note *} Cos (on coins of third cent, and inscrr., Paton-Hicks No. 10, &c); Rhodes (e.g. Ath. Mitth. 1877, 224); Delos (B. C. H. vii. 106); Carpathos (B. C. H. iv. 271, 276), &c.

^{page 114 note †} See Paton-Hicks, No. 10, &c. For Rhodes, Ath. Mitth., l.c., and Cauer's Delectus, No 195 (Amphora handles).

^{page 115 note *} Le Blant, Manuel d'épigraphie chrét., p. 27 ff.; Bayet, Revue Arch., 1876, ii. p. 287 f.; and Ramsay, Cit. and Bish. of Phrygia, Nos. 371, 653, 673.

^{page 115 note †} The inscr. of Eregli (Herakleia-Perinthos) in Thrace (Dumont, Inscr. et mon. fig. de la Thrace, p. 42 [Archives des miss, scient., 1876, p. 154]) which contains this monogram three times after each name, and was thought by De Rossi “to be of an epoch anterior to Constantine,” is probably to be assigned to the third century on account of the occurrence of the praenomen Aurelius in each of the three names, on the principle enunciated by Ramsay, J. H. S., 1883, p. 30, Cit. and Bish., vol. ii., No. 235. Cp. Dittenberger, Inschr. von Olympia, No. 110.

^{page 115 note ‡} E.g. Ramsay, op. cit. Nos. 445, 654, 655, 659, &c.

^{page 115 note §} Quoted by M. Bayet.

^{page 115 note ║} Οἰκος in B. C. H., 1883, 239 (Isauria); Kaibel, Ep. Gr. 262 (Corcyra); B. C. H., 1878, 610 (Cibyra); B. C. H., 1894. II (Magnesia), &c. οἶκος αἰώνιος in C. I. A. iii. 3510 (Athens); I. G. S. I., 1464 (Italy); Ath. Mitth. 1888, 246 (Laodiceia Combusta): cf. Kaibel, 321, οἶκος ἐναίδιος For domus and domus aeterna, see the references in Marquardt, Handbuch vii., p. 365, n. 5. The idea of deification, which sometimes occurs, is of course not excluded: οἶκος may mean “temple” as well as” house.”

^{page 116 note *} For some of these references I am indebted to M. Perdrizet.

^{page 116 note †} Κόπρος the name of an Attic deme belonging to the tribe Hippothontis (see Böckh on C. I. G. 145 = C. I. A. i., 185) is not connected with this class of names, though Aristophanes plays on it in Eq. 899, Eccl. 317. It is clearly connected with the hero Κοπρεύς (see Roscher's Lexicon, s.v.).

^{page 116 note ‡} Le Blant, M., Revue Arch., 1868, ii., p. 4 ff.Google Scholar; Inscr. Chrét. de la Gaule, ii., p. 66 ff.

^{page 116 note §} Ramsay, op. cit., p. 493, and Nos. 28, 412.

^{page 119 note *} An improved copy of this epigram, which I made in 1897, is published in J. H. S., 1898, p. 112.

^{page 120 note *} Κάρπος also ᾿Εφ.᾿Αρχ 1895, p. 172, C. I. A. iii. 3510, &c.