Oxygen isotopes in ocean sediments provide a continuous record of climate changes over the past several hundred thousand years (see, for example, Reference Hays, Imbrie and ShackletonHays and others (1976) or Reference EmilianiEmiliani (1978). The ratio of 180 to 160 is measured in the calcium carbonate shells of small marine fossils and the isotope composition is expressed at i180, the deviation in parts per thousand of the isotope ratio of the sample compared with the isotope ratio of a convenient standard. For the most part, the δ180 record is similar in ocean sediment cores recovered from different parts of the world (Fig.1). It is generally believed that this record reflects the global total of glacial ice; 160 is preferentially deposited onto ice sheets so that higher values of δ180 in the ocean sediments indicate higher ice volume. In the following discussion we evaluate this interpretation and conclude that it is correct to “first order”, but that (1) effects other than ice volume may control part of the amplitude of the δ180 signal, and (2) even considering the effect of volume alone, the time record of the δl80 signal is probably distorted compared with the true ice volume record.
Originally it was believed that δ18O measures the temperature of the water in which the calcium carbonate shells were formed. An increase of roughly 0.2‰ takes place for each 1 K decrease in temperature (Reference Epstein, Buchsbaum, Lowenstam and UreyEpstein and others 1953). Note that this effect operates in the same “direction” as the effect of ice volume, so that colder climates mean higher δ180. The observed increase in δ180 between today’s conditions and those of a glacial maximum is in the range from 1.5 to 2.0‰ for the fossils of bottom-dwelling as well as surface–dwelling organisms (Reference ShackletonShackleton 1967). The inferred temperature change, over 7 K, is far too large for bottom waters and thus the temperature effect cannot be the prime contributor to δ180 variations, at least in bottom-dwelling organisms.
The ice volume effect can account for most of the amplitude of δ18O variations provided that there is enough isotopic fractionation between ocean water and glacial ice. From measurements of the isotopic composition of rain and snow at the present time and of ice from Greenland and Antarctica, it has been inferred that the great Pleistocene ice sheets were from about 30 to 40‰ lighter than ocean water (Reference OlaussonOlausson 1965, Reference Dansgaard and TauberDansgaard and Tauber 1969). Since the fraction of ocean water stored in the Pleistocene ice sheets was about 0.03, the ice volume effect would then account for a change of from roughly 0.9 to 1.2‰, or about two-thirds of the observed variation.
We have recently obtained results from a model of isotopic fractionation in evaporation and precipitation (Fig.2) which support this conclusion (Covey and HaagensonFootnote *). Results of the model depend strongly on (a) the degree to which non-equilibrium processes act in evaporation, (b) the height to which saturated air is raised after its formation, and (c) the temperature at which precipitation is formed. After obtaining representative values for these parameters by calibrating the model against isotope data from the present, we extend the calculations to predict the isotopic composition of precipitation onto the Laurentide ice sheet during the last glacial maximum. Our results (Fig.3) imply that near the ice divide, δ180 relative to ocean water should have been ~ 30‰. Since most of the ice in an equilibrium ice sheet originates near the ice divide, the conclusion is that the isotopic fractionation/ice volume effect is large enough to account for most of the δ180 signal in oceanic sediments.
It should be noted, however, that the sensitivity of isotope composition to the meteorological details of evaporation and precipitation does introduce significant uncertainties into the interpretation of a related paleoclimate proxy, namely the isotope composition of ice cores from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. The amount of 180 in ice is found to decrease during glacial periods; this has been interpreted as indicating colder temperatures at the 1ce sheet surface during these times (Reference Dansgaard, Johnsen, Clausen, Langway and TurekianDansgaard and others 1971). Our results (Fig.3) show that a lowering of δ180 may indeed be caused by a decrease in temperature, but it may also be caused by a shift in precipitation patterns, e.g. by Increased uplift of precipitating air masses independent of terrain elevation. Thus the ice-core data are more ambiguous than has been hitherto appreciated.
It is important to assess the ice volume effects of the Antarctic as well as the Pleistocene ice sheets. During a glacial maximum the exposure of the Antarctic continental shelf would allow the ice sheet to expand. An approximate 10% increase in ice volume results from a shelf exposure of 0.5° latitude. The change in volume is much less than the volume of the Pleistocene ice sheets though its effect on the δ180 record would be magnified by the fact that Antarctic ice is isotopically very light.
In addition to the temperature and ice volume effects, many other factors such as variations of isotope composition within the oceans, non-equilibrium incorporation of oxygen isotopes into marine animal shells, and preferential dissolution of isotopically lighter shells can influence the δ180 signal. Reference Berger and GardnerBerger and Gardner (1975) estimate that each of these effects could contribute up to 0.5‰. Surprisingly few laboratory studies have been performed on cultured foraminifera to quantify effects such as these (Reference Erez and LuzErez and Luz 1982).
Other effects may distort the time series of δ180 obtained from sediment cores away from the true ice volume record. Bioturbation preferentially diminishes the Record of higher-frequency fluctuations (Reference GoreauGoreau 1980, Reference Dalfes, Schneider, Thompson, Berger, Hays, Imbrie and SaltzmanDalfes and others in press), furthermore, we must consider the changing isotopic composition of the ice sheets themselves: the ice sheets were probably isotopically heavier (less negative δ180) at their inception than at their maximum extent (Reference OlaussonOlausson 1981). Thus the apparent record of ice growth inferred from ocean sediment δ180, which implicitly assumes a constant isotopic composition for the ice sheets, will lag the true ice volume record. Estimates based on simple Isotope budgets for the Pleistocene ice sheets indicate that this lag time could be as long as several thousand years; similar effects may create a lag between ice decay and its appearance in the δ180 record (Reference OlaussonOlausson 1981, Reference Mix and RuddimanMix and Ruddiman in press).
More detailed calculations with an ice-sheet/ice-flow model (Reference Covey, Schneider, Berger, Hays, Imbrie and SaltzmanCovey and Schneider in press) imply that the distortions between ice volume and δ180 record may be even greater because in a real ice sheet a large amount of the ice has a very long residence time. Covey and Schneider use a zonally symmetric ice-sheet model with power law creep and instant bedrock adjustment. δ180 of deposition is specified as a function of the height of the ice sheet, and isotopes are advected by the ice flow. Preliminary results for the Antarctic ice sheet are shown in Figure 4. Long after the ice sheet reaches an equilibrium height, a large amount of (relatively) isotopically heavy ice remains trapped below the bedrock level.
In summary, it is apparent that the δ180 record from ocean sediment cores primarily reflects the changing ice volume during the Pleistocene. The isotope record is probably good enough to identify the major cycles of glacial/interglacial variations, i.e. the cycle of 106 a and other “Milankovitch peaks”. But caution should be exercised in examining the details, particularly in interpreting phase lags between ice volume and other climatic variables such as temperature, and in “tuning” the results of climate models to correlate with δ180 series.
The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.