Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:39:43.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A one-dimensional model of the evolution of snow-cover characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Takeshi Yamazaki
Affiliation:
Geophysical Institute, Tohoku University, Sendai 980, Japan
Junsei Kondo
Affiliation:
Geophysical Institute, Tohoku University, Sendai 980, Japan
Takashi Sakuraoka
Affiliation:
Daiwa Sohken, Tokyo 104, Japan
Toru Nakamura
Affiliation:
Japan Marine Science and Technology Center, Yokosuka 237, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A one-dimensional model has been developed to simulate the evolution of snow-cover characteristics using meteorological data. This model takes into account the heat balance at the snow surface and heat conduction in the snow cover as well as liquid water flow and densification. The basic variables of the model are snow temperature, liquid water content, snow density and the solid impurities density. With these four variables, the model can calculate albedo, thermal conductivity, liquid water flux, snow depth, water equivalent and the amount of runoff.

Diurnal variation of profiles of snow temperature, water content and snow density, and meteorological elements were observed at Mount Zao Bodaira, Yamagata Prefecture, Japan. Simulated diurnal variation patterns of each component by the model were in good agreement with the observations. Moreover, the snow-cover characteristics were simulated for three 90-day periods with meteorological data and snow pit observations at Sapporo. It was found that the model was able to simulate long-period variations of albedo, snow depth, snow water equivalent and the snow density profile.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1993

Introduction

The characteristics and structures of snow change continually and influence albedo and thermal conductivity, which are important for climate. Snow-cover characteristics are strongly influenced by meteorological conditions. Therefore, we propose a one-dimensional model using meteorological data to simulate the snow-cover characteristics for the purpose of clarifying the heat balance and water cycle at the Earth's surface.

There were few all-round snow metamorphism models after a pioneer model developed by Reference AndersonAnderson (1976). Recently, Reference Brun, Martin, Simon, Gendre and ColeouBrun and others (1989) proposed an energy and mass model for operational avalanche forecasting, and the model was advanced to take into account grain-size and type of snow (Reference Brun, David, Sudul and BrunotBrun and others, 1992). However, there are few models which can directly predict snow albedo including the effects of solid impurities and liquid water.

Basic Equations

Figure 1 shows the schematic of the physical processes in the model in this paper. All of the physical variables in this model are described by snow temperature T s, the amount of liquid water ρ1w, the dry snow density ρdry. and the solid impurities density ρ D for albedo.

• Snow temperature T s

For a snow surface

(1)

In a snow cover

(2)

C s: specific heat of snow; λ s: thermal conductivity of snow; l f: latent heat of fusion of ice; F: amount of snowmelt per unit time and volume; I = (1 − A s)S↓; A s: albedo; S↓: solar radiation; μ: extinction coefficient of solar radiation; z: depth from the snow surface; L↓: downward atmospheric radiation; T sfc; snow surface temperature; : emissivity of snow (= 0.97); σ: Stefan-Boltzmann constant; H: sensible heat flux; lE: latent heat flux.

• Amount of liquid water ρ1w ρ1w: mass of liquid water per unit volume; Q: downward liquid water flux (Reference ColbeckColbeck, 1978; Reference ShimizuShimizu, 1970).

(3)

• Dry snow density ρdry

(4)

W s: load; η compactive viscosity coefficient of snow.

• Solid impurities density ρD

(5)

ρD mass of solid impurities per unit volume of snow; fD: rate of impurities flow; ρ wet: wet snow density

(= ρdiy + ρ1w).

Fig. 1. Sckematic of the relation between the physical processes and snow-cover characteristics in this model.

In practice, Equations (1)-(5) are written in differential forms to calculate the profiles of the variables. (A simple version was described in the appendix inReference Kondo and Yamazaki Kondo and Yamazaki (1990).) The input data are solar and downward radiation, air temperature, specific humidity, wind speed and precipitation. Snowfall and rainfall are distinguished by air temperature (2°C) in the model. The density of new snow is assumed to be 70 kg m−3.

Albedo

The albedo of pure dry snow is obtained from profiles of dry snow density and the optical absorption coefficient of ice (Reference Kondo and YamazakiKondo and others, 1988). The multiple reflection is considered with an assumption that snow is constructed by ice plates and air layers(Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Schematic of snow albedo submodel.

The albedo, A s, is obtained by two-stream model as

(6)

where

and

Here, μ i is the extinction coefficient of solar radiation in i-th snow layer, r1 the reflectivity of ice (= 0.018), ρI the density of ice and kI the absorption coefficient of ice (assumed to be 10 m−1). The thickness of an ice layer l Ii is obtained as

(7)
(8)

where

is the specific surface area (the area of the surface of the ice particles in unit volume of snow) in i-th snow layer. The units of ρ dry,i and
are gem−3 and m2kg−1, respectively. Equation (8) is an experimental equation based on the data in Reference Kondo, Numata and YamazakiNarita (1971).

In the model, it is considered that albedo is decreased by the impurities and liquid water content in snow. As the density of the impurities increases, optical absorption coefficient increases. The increase of effective absorption coefficient due to impurities, k D, is assumed to be equal to the cross-section of the impurities per unit volume of ice. Based on a few assumptions for characteristics of impurities, the following equation can be obtained:

(9)

The units of k D and ρ D are m−1 and kgm−3, respectively. The amount of aerosol fallout is given by (3.14 × 10−8)β (kgm−2s−1), which is obtained from an assumption of the aerosol-size distribution, where β is the atmospheric turbidity defined byReference Yamamoto, Tanaka and Arao Yamamoto and others (1968).

The effect of liquid water on albedo is described through a decrease in the specific surface area. That is

(10)

where

(11)

ω is water content (= ρ1w/ρ wet) and γ = 1.9 (Yamazaki and others, 1991). The value of S*(ρ wet) is obtained from Equation (8) using p wet instead of ρ dry.

Sensible and Latent Heat Flux

Sensible heat H and latent heat lE are written as

(12)

and

(13)

Here, Cp and ρ are specific heat at constant pressure and density of air, respectively, and U T a and q a are wind speed, air temperature and specific humidity, respectively. The value q sat(T sfc) is the saturated specific humidity at surface temperature T sfc. Bulk coefficients C H and C E are set at 0.002 and 0.0021 at a reference height of 1 m, respectively (Reference Kondo and YamazakiKondo and Yamazawa, 1986).

Thermal Conductivity

The thermal conductivity is parameterized using porosity P (= 1 − ρ dry/ρI) as follows.

(14)

where λa is the thermal conductivity of the transverse structure piled by ice plates and air layers same as Figure 1 (the smallest theoretical conductivity), and λb is that of the longitudinal structure (the largest theoretical conductivity). They are written as

(15)

and

(16)

where

(17)

Here, λI is the thermal conductivity of ice (2.2 W m−1K−1), λA the thermal conductivity of air (2.14 × 10−2W m−1K−1), λ′ A the effective thermal conductivity of air corrected for vapor diffusion, L the latent heat of sublimation of ice (2.83 MJ kg−1), D v the diffusion coefficient of water vapor (6.5 × 10−5m2s−1) and C the saturated vapor density.

Compactive Viscosity

The compactive viscosity coefficient of wet snow is obtained from the equation for dry snow (Reference KojimaKojima, 1957; Reference ShinojimaShinojima, 1967) using a multiplicative factor which describes the decrease of the compactive viscosity coefficient due to liquid water. That is

(18)

where A(w) is assumed as

(19)

Here, η 0 (6.9 × 105 kg s m−2), K (2.1 × 10−3 m3 kg−1), α s(9.58 × 10−2 °C−1) and β s (= 18) are constants.

Short-Period Simulation

Diurnal variation of profiles of temperature, water content and snow density were simulated for the following observation. The detail of the observation has been described in Yamazaki and others (1991). Period: 23-28 February and 9-15 March 1989. Place: Mount Zao Bodaira, Yamagata Prefecture, Japan (a flat soil tennis court).

Observations: air temperature, humidity, wind speed, solar radiation, albedo, snow depth, snow type, snow temperature, water content, density and solid impurities density.

Solid impurities density was measured using a method of light absorption (Reference Kondo and YamazakiKondo and others, 1988). The impurity particles are almost mineral. The range of measured absorption coefficients, k D, in the top 5 cm of the snow cover is from 0.1 m−1 (26 February) to 9.8 m−1(15 March). Figure 3 displays the values of observed and calculated albedo.

Fig. 3. Comparison of calculated and observed snow albedo at Zao Bodaira. Δ: effcts of impurities or liquid water are not considered; ×: taking only impurities into account; O: effects of impurities and liquid water are considered.

Figure 4 shows the simulated and observed snow temperature profiles for 23 February. The snow temperature was measured using a thermistor thermometer. The solar radiation was shut off with a board at the moment of measurement. The initial profiles of this simulation are given at 0700 h. Diurnal variation patterns of water content are also in agreement with the observations (figure not shown)

Fig. 4. An example of calculated and observed snow temperature profiles.

Long-Period Simulation

Period: 1986–1988 (3 winters).

Place: Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

Data: Meteorological data and snow-pit observations at the Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University (e.g. Reference Endo, Aki and MizunoEndo and others, 1986; Reference Ishikawa and MotoyamaIshikawa and Motoyama, 1986) and meteorological data at Sapporo District Meteorological Observatory.

Figure 5 shows the time series of albedo in 1986. The values of important parameters are listed in Table 1. In this calculation it is assumed that the impurities do not flow out because the value of fD is set to zero for the snowmelt season. However, the estimated albedo is smaller than the observations (Reference Ishikawa and MotoyamaIshikawa and Motoyama, 1986) in the later period. The actual amount of aerosol fallout may be larger than the value which is used in this simulation. At the start of the season, the albedo is slightly underestimated. The reason for this is unclear, however, the observed values in this year are higher than usual.

Fig. 5. Comparison of calculated and observed snow albedo for 1986. The observed values are averaged from 1100 to 1200 h (wave length: 0.29-3.0 μm).

Table 1 The list of the main parameters

In Figures 6 and 7 the calculated snow depth and snow water equivalent are compared with the observations (Reference Ishikawa and MotoyamaIshikawa and Motoyama, 1986; Endo and others, 1986). The calculated values are overestimated in snowmelt season, because the albedo is large.

Fig. 6. Comparison of calculated and observed snow depth for 1986.

Fig. 7. Comparison of calculated and observed snow water equivalent for 1986.

Concluding Remarks

The evolution of snow-cover characteristics was simulated with a one-dimensional energy balance model. This model includes new parameterizations of the albedo, thermal conductivity and compactive viscosity. In particular, snow albedo was predicted taking into account the effects due to solid impurities and liquid water. The agreement between observed and calculated components was obtained for short- and long-period simulations. However, the handling of impurities requires much more study.

References

Anderson, E.A. 1976 A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover. NOAA Tech. Rep. NWS 19.Google Scholar
Brun, E. Martin, E. Simon, V. Gendre, C. Coleou, C. 1989 An energy and mass model of snow cover suitable for operational avalanche forecasting. J. Glaciol., 35(121), 333–342.Google Scholar
Brun, E. David, P. Sudul, M. Brunot, G. 1992 A numerical model to simulate snow–cover stratigraphy for operational avalanche forecasting. J. Glaciol., 38(128), 1322.Google Scholar
Colbeck, S.C. 1978 The physical aspects of water flow through snow. Adv. Hydrosci. 11, 165206.Google Scholar
Endo, Y. Aki, E. Mizuno, Y. 1986 Report of pit–wall observations of snow cover in Sapporo 1985–86. Low Temp. Sci., Ser. A 45, Data Rep., 110. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Ishikawa, N. Motoyama, H. 1986 Radiation measurements of snowy season in 1986 at Sapporo. Low Temp. Sci., Ser. A 45, Data Rep., 1723. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Kojima, K. 1957 Viscous compression of natural snow layers III. Low Temp. Sci., Ser. A 16, 167196. [In Japanese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Kondo, J. Yamazaki, T. 1990 A prediction model for snowmelt, snow surface temperature and freezing depth using a heat balance method. J. Appl Meteorol., 29(5), 375384.Google Scholar
Kondo, J. Yamazawa, H. 1986 Bulk transfer coefficient over a snow surface. Boundary–Layer Meteorol., 34(1–2), 123135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, J. Numata, Y. Yamazaki, T. 1988 Parameterization of snow albedo. Seppyo. Journal of the Japanese Society of Snow and Ice, 50(4), 216224. [In Japanese with English summary.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narita, H. 1971 Specific surface of deposited snow II. Low Temp. Sci., Ser. A 29, 6979. [In Japanese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Shimizu, H. 1970 Air permeability of deposited snow. Contrib. Inst. Low Temp. Sci., Ser. A 22. 132.Google Scholar
Shinojima, K. 1967 Study on the visco–elastic deformation of deposited snow. In Ōura H., ed. Physics of snow and ice. Sapporo, Hokkaido University. Institute of Low Temperature Science, 875907.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, G. Tanaka, M. Arao, K. 1968 Hemispherical distribution of turbidity coefficient as estimated from direct solar radiation measurements. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 46, 287300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamazaki, T. Sakuraoka, T. Nakamura, T. Kondo, J. 1991 A study of snow metamorphism. Seppyo. Journal of the Japanese Society of Snow and Ice, 53(2), 115133. [In Japanese with English summary.]Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sckematic of the relation between the physical processes and snow-cover characteristics in this model.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Schematic of snow albedo submodel.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Comparison of calculated and observed snow albedo at Zao Bodaira. Δ: effcts of impurities or liquid water are not considered; ×: taking only impurities into account; O: effects of impurities and liquid water are considered.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. An example of calculated and observed snow temperature profiles.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Comparison of calculated and observed snow albedo for 1986. The observed values are averaged from 1100 to 1200 h (wave length: 0.29-3.0 μm).

Figure 5

Table 1 The list of the main parameters

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Comparison of calculated and observed snow depth for 1986.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Comparison of calculated and observed snow water equivalent for 1986.