Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:24:20.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphology and late Cenozoic (<5 Ma) glacial history of the area between David and Mawson Glaciers, Victoria Land, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Anja L.L.M. Verbers
Affiliation:
Bundesantstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (B.G.R.), P.O. Box 510153, D-30631 Hannover, Germany
Volkmar Damm
Affiliation:
Bundesantstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (B.G.R.), P.O. Box 510153, D-30631 Hannover, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glacio-geological field work and radar ice-thickness sounding were carried out in the area between David and Mawson Glaciers. A subglacial topographic map has been compiled from radio-echo-sounding data. The northern part of this map shows that the trench of David Glacier reaches a depth of more than 1000 m below sea level. The area south of David Glacier comprises a landscape of nunatak clusters dissected by glaciated valleys with ice thicknesses as much as 800 m. Subglacial cirques occur at the outer margins of the nunatak clusters. A model for the regional glacial history is proposed. It starts with a major deglaciation in the Pliocene, which results in marine transgression in basins west of the Transantarctic Mountains. During the late Pliocene, the ice advanced towards the northeast, depositing a thin layer of (Sirius Group) till containing reworked mid-Pliocene marine diatoms. Due to accelerated mountain uplift, the ice cut iIlto the pre-Pliocene peneplain, eroding broad valleys. A period of ice-sheet retreat followed to expose a landscape of large nunataks separated by wide valleys. During this period, local cirque glaciation occurred. When the ice sheet advanced again, another phase of uplift forced the glaciers to cut deeper into the valleys. Probably since the Last Glacial Maximum the ice surface has lowered by about 100 m.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1994

Introduction

During the sixth German Antarctic North Victoria Land Expedition (GANOVEX VI, 1990–91), a glacio-geological reconnaissance was carried out in the area between David and Mawson Glaciers (Reference Verbers, Wateren, vander, Yoshida, Kaminuma and ShiraishiVerbers and van der Wateren, 1992). Based on this reconnaissance, two principal hypotheses were developed:

This paper reports on new observations of the DavidGlacier region taken during GANOVEX VII, 1992–93. It advances a model of glacial retreats and advances together with episodic mountain uplift to account for the observed subglacial topography.

Ice-thickness measurements

The ice thickness of the area between David and Mawson Glaciers was determined using an airborne radio-echo-sounding system developed by the B.G.R. The antennas of the system were mounted on a bird which was suspended about 20 m beneath the helicopter, and 10–20 m above the ice surface. The reflections of the radar pulses in the band of 20–80 MHz were recorded on an analog system and later digitized for further computer analysis and to produce computer-generated contour maps. A Magellan GPS unit was used for positioning the reflection points. This is a C/A code receiver with an accuracy of about 100 m in the horizontal for a single measurement. The accuracy was improved by continuous measurements of the GPS unit during each flight (I position s-1 ) and by tracking many more than the minimum of four satellites. Because of the small scatter of GPS data along each flight path, we are confident that the accuracy is suitable for our purpose and could be estimated as an error of no more than 50 m. All calculations, i.e. geographic and elevation positioning as well as depth of reflections, were done during post-processing at the B.G.R. A wave velocity of 168 ms-1 through ice was assumed for all data. Along profiles of about 1500 km length and on an irregular grid (approx. 8000 km2 ), about 1000 reflections were recorded and included in the final interpretation. The position of each reflection point was recalculated using the continuously measured GPS data and the time of radar reflection which was stored for each measurement on a personal computer. The positions of data points were plotted on a map and the edges of all outcrops in the area were set with a zero ice thickness, based on the 1:250 000 USGS topographic maps “Mount Joyce” and “Relief Inlet” (Fig. 1). These data were used to generate an isopach map of the ice using the GEOSOFT software package (and the interpolation algorithm of kriging) (Fig. 2). To derive the subglacialtopography, the surface topography from the USGS maps was digitized and gridded using the same scheme. The ice-thickness grid was subtracted to obtain bottom elevations (Fig. 3).

Fig. 1 Research area.MwF, Mawson Fault; MrF, Murray Fault; AP, Ambalada Peak; BD, Burrage Dome; BP, Brimstone Peak; CV, Cirque Valley; GN, Griffin Nunatak; HB, Hughes Bluff; MB, Morris Basin; MN, McLea Nunatak; MtB, Mount Billing; Mt⁈, Mount ⁈oyce; MP, Mount Priestley; RH, Ricker Hills; RN, Richard Nunatak; TN, Trio Nunatak. (Map is based on Reference CarmignaniCarmignani and others (1988) and Reference Skinner and RickerSkinner and Ricker (1968))Nunataks are in black; flight lines are dotted.

Fig. 2 Ice-thickness map

Fig. 3 Subglacial topography map

Interpretation

The northern part of the map shows a part of the subglacial trench of David Glacier (Fig. 3). David Glacier is an outlet glacier that drains an area of 224000 km2 east of Dome Circe in central Victoria Land, Antarctica (Reference ChinnChinn, 1988). The greatest measured ice thickness of David Glacier is 2530 m, just inland of the main icefall (Reference Steed, Drewry and CraddockSteed and Drewry, 1982). At this point, the glacier bed reaches 1630 m below sea level. Just north of Trio Nunatak, a depression followed by a sub glacial ridge was recognized in our measurements (Fig. 4). It coincides with the icefall north of Trio Nunatak. At this location, the ice thickness is 1500 m, and the depression reaches 300 m below sea level. This depression might extend to the northeast to meet the deep depression measured by Reference Steed, Drewry and CraddockSteed and Drewry (1982). This southwest-northeast running depression might follow a fault, which would fit in the fault system proposed below. In our measurements, David Glacier reaches its greatest depth of-1000 m m.s.l. at the narrowest point, between Hughes Bluff and Mount Priestley (Fig. 1)

Fig. 4 West-east cross-section of David Glacier, north of Trio Nunatak; for location see profile A-A' in Figure 1. Bedrock, dotted;ice, white.

The valley of David Glacier is deep in comparison with the valleys to the south. The latter divide the area into clusters of nunataks in a rectangular pattern. This rectangular pattern might reflect a fault system in the Bed rock. The presence of faults in the coastal area has already been suggested by Reference Gunn and WarrenGunn and Warren (1962) and Reference Skinner and RickerSkinner and Ricker (1968). The latter suggested that extensive block faulting took place, based on displacement of topographic features and reference surfaces (Fig. 1). Reference Stackebrandt, Watercn, van, Verbers and TessensohnStackebrandt (1994) proposed a late Cenozoic rectangular fault and fracture pattern with similarorientations for the area north of David Glacier. Reference Gunn and WarrenGunn and Warren (1962) suggested that David Glacier occupies a transverse fault. Fault patterns in relation to ice-filled valleys have also been described from Marie Byrd Land by Reference LeMasurier, Rex and CraddockLe Masurier and Rex (1982).

Closed sub glacial depressions occur in the central parts of the glacial valleys. They are about 200 m deeper the mean depth of the valleys. The depressions may be the result of glacial erosion along faults, as zones of weakness caused by the faulting enhances the depth of glacial erosion. Reference Orombelli, Baroni and DentonOrombelli and others (1991) suggested glacial valley formation by headward erosion. At this stage, we are unable to test which model applies.

Subglacial depressions also occur associated with the nunatak clusters. The depressions are bounded by nunatak walls but open to one side. The open side is separated from the main valley by a threshold, which can be 200 m high (Fig. 5). These depressions are taken to be subglacial cirques

Fig 5 Southwest-northeast cross-section of Mount Billing; for location see profile B-B' in Figure l.

Exposed topography

The area consists of a number of nunatak clusters surrounded by vast areas of ice. The bedrock geology is relatively simple. A Precambrian/Palacozoic meta-morphic/granitic basement is sub-horizontally and un-conformably overlain by Jurassic Ferrar Group basic volcanics with rafts of Palaeozoic and Mesozoic Beacon Supergroup sediments (Reference Skinner and RickerSkinner and Ricker, 1968; Reference WörnerWörner,1992).

The nunataks show four morphological units representing different phases of glaciation; summit plateaux, terraces, cirques and ice-cored moraines. At present, the nunataks expose shallow undulating summit plateaux. They rise in altitude from 1000 m near the coast to 2300 m in the westernmost, inland part of the area. The difference in elevation between the plateaux and the ice surface ranges between 400 and 800 m on the northeast side of the nunataks, while on the southwest sides this is between 50 and 500 m. Terraccs and glacially rounded ridges are situated between 150 and 400 m above the ice surface. They are assumed to have formed by glacial erosion and represent remnants of former glacial valley floors. Large cirques with a diameter up to 8 km are present at a number of nunataks. Ice-cored moraines are present on the north to northeast sides of all nunataks, and range between 0 and 50 m above the present ice surface. Based on their morphology, they consist of lateral moraines, shear moraines or dead-ice topography moraines. They might be Holocene to late Wisconsin in age (Reference Orombelli, Baroni and DentonOrombelli and others, 1991

Basement and Beacon Super group derived erratics arc absent on the summit plateaux. We suggest that the plateaux were formed before basement or Beacon Super group bedrock was exhumed and propose that the present-day plateaux are dissected remnants of a (glacial) erosion surface. The frequency of basement and Beacon Supergrouperratics increases towards landforms of lower elevation and towards the coast

Sirius Group till in which reworked Pliocene marine diatoms are present is found on the summit plateaux only, while it is absent on the terraces. The diatom Thalassiosiravulnifica indicates a mid-Pliocene age, while Thalassiosiralentiginosa is early Pliocene to recent in age (personal communication from D. M. Harwood, 1993)

The restricted occurrence of Sirius Group till on the plateaux suggests that glacial valleys were formed after deposition of the Sirius Group till. This valley erosion accounts for the absence of this type of till on the present-day terraces. The restricted occurrence of Sirius Group till also makes wind as the transport and deposition medium for these diatoms (Reference SugdenSugden, 1992) doubtful.

Former ice-flow directions can be detected on each morphological unit. On the summit plateaux, striations are absent, presumably because of weathering, but streamlined bedrock features and very shallow valleys indicate a former ice movement towards the northeast.

Terraces and glaciated ridges indicate a former flow direction to the northeast, concluded from striations and erratic dispersal (Reference Verbers, Wateren, vander, Yoshida, Kaminuma and ShiraishiVerbers and van der Wateren, 1992).

Cirques occur on all sides of the nunatak clusters but mostly on the northeast sides. This indicates that during their formation local ice caps were present on the nunatak clusters, draining the ice in each possible direction. At present, ice-free cirques are found at elevations between 800 and 1600 m a.s.l. Some of the cirque floors are even 100 m lower than the present regional ice surface, as the cirque lips prevent the ice from flowing into the cirque. During the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) the ice sheet partly intruded into the empty cirques. Since then the ice has retreated, leaving series of ice-cored end moraines behind. The ice surface has lowered about 100 m, exhuming fresh striations on the cirque lips.At presentthe ice flows in a northeast direction, funneled by the southwest-northeast running valleys, or flowing over topographic steps which are present between the nunataks

Discussion

Reference Tessensohn, Wateren, vander, Verbers and TessensohnTessensohn (1994) suggested that the Transantarctic Mountains consist of several fault blocks, each with a different history. We suggest that each block also has its own glacial history that is linked to the uplift of the block Reference Wateren F.M, Verbers and TessensohnVan der Wateren and others, 1994; van der Wateren and others, in press). We propose a regional glacial history model that is consistent with the observations. The model is separated into “ice-sheet retreat phases” (1,3 and 5) and “ice-sheet advance phases” (2 and 4). There are two age constraints: the present day and the presence of mid-Pliocene diatoms on the summit plateaux.

Reference Barrett, Hambrey, Robinson, Thomson, Crame and ThomsonBarrett and others (1991) and Reference Hambrey, Larsen and EhrmannHambrey and others ;(1989) observed that glaciation of Antarctica started in early Oligocene (≥36 Ma) times. We accept this and assume that an icc sheet occupied the area prior to the Pliocene.

Model

  • 1. During the earliest Pliocene (>5 Ma), the area between David and Mawson Glaciers comprised anundulating (glacial) erosion surface or peneplain. As a result of a major deglaciation of Antarctica, marine transgression occurred, via the DavidGlacier valley and other inlets, into basins west ofthe Transantarctic Mountains (Reference Webb, Harwood, McKelvey, Mercer and StottWebb and others,1984). The Wilkes sub glacial basin forms the hinterland of David Glacier, which at present hasa bedrock elevation as deep as -1000 m. If there bound to isostasy is taken into account, it reaches a maximum depth of about 0 mm.s.l. (Reference DrewryDrewry,1983). This presents a problem because marinetransgression would be hardly possible. Perhapsthere has been some minor tectonic uplift of centralAntarctica since Pliocene times, or there may be ashortcoming with the conventional models forrebound toward isostasy

  • 2. In the late Pliocene, the East Antarctic ice sheetadvanced, flowing towards the northeast, depositing a layer of Sirius Group till, containing recycledmid-Pliocene marine diatoms (personal communication from D. M. Harwood, 1993).

  • 2a Glacial dissection of the undulating peneplain took place. We suggest that formation of broad glacial valleys occurred along Emit lines and was induced by mountain uplift. Large amounts of debris were transported towards the northeast. Only small patches of Sirius Group till were preserved on the plateaux

  • 3 The icc sheet partly retreated, exposing a landscape of nunatak clusters dissected by wide valleys.

  • 3a A period of local cirque glaciation occurred, nunatak clusters were partly “eaten away” by these glaciers, producing the nunataks as they are today.

  • 4 The ice sheet advanced again with an average flowdirection to the northeast but generally followingthe glacial valleys

  • 4a Another phase of uplift accompanied by glacier erosion caused over deepening of the existing valleys. Presumably, uplift fractured rock and/or increased gradients that drive glacier motion and so made sub glacial erosion more effective. The remnants of the shallow valleys formed during phase 3 are the present-day terraces

  • 5 At present, the ice continues to drain to the northeast but, probably since the Last Glacial Maximum, the ice has retreated about 100 m inelevation

Conclusions

The glacial history model as proposed in this paper is based on regional data and is therefore restricted. It shows large ice-volume fluctuations and is to a large extent influenced by recent mountain uplift. The age constraints are limited, although the presence of mid-Pliocene marine diatoms in the summit-plateaux till gives a maximum age for the morphology of the area.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Bundesanstaltfur Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (B.G.R., Hannover) for the invitation to participate in and the very good logistic support during GAKOVEX VII. We specially thank J. Kothe, B. Staite and W. Bremmers. The research of the first author (A.L.L.M.V.) was supported by a European Community sectoral grant, while her travel expenses were supported by The Netherlands Marine Research Foundation (S.O.Z.) of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (N.W.O.).

Footnotes

The accuracy of references in the text and in this list is the responsibility of the author, to whom queries should be addressed

References

Barrett, P.J., Hambrey, M.J. and Robinson, P.R.. 1991. Cenozoic glacial and tectonic history from CIROS-1, McMurdo Sound. In Thomson, M.R.A., Crame, J.A. and Thomson, J.W., eds. Geological evolution of Antarctica. Cambridge, etc., Cambridge University Press, 651656.Google Scholar
Barrett, P.J., Adams, C.J., McIntosh, W.C., Swisher, C.C. III and Wilson, G.S.. 1992. Gcochronologica1 evidence supporting Antarctic deglaciation three million years ago. Nature. 359(6398), 816818.Google Scholar
Carmignani, L. and 7 others. 1988. Geological map of the area between David and :Mariner Glaciers, Victoria Land (Antarctica). Memoriedella società Geologica Italiana, 33.Google Scholar
Chinn, T.J.. 1988. The “dry valleys” of Victoria Land. U.S. Geol. Surv.Prof Pap. 1386-B, 3954.Google Scholar
Drewry, D.J., ed. 1983. Antarctica: glaciological and geophysical folio. Cambridge, University of Cambridge. Scott Polar Research In-stitute.Google Scholar
Gunn, B.M. and Warren, G.. 1962. Geology of Victoria Land between the Mawson and Mulock Glaciers, Antarctica. N. ʐ. Geol. Surv. Bull.,n.s., 71.Google Scholar
Hambrey, M.J., Larsen, B., Ehrmann, W.U. and ODP Leg 119 Shipboard Scientific Party. 1989. Forty million years of Antarctic glacial history yielded by Leg 119 of the Ocean Drilling Program. Polar Rec., 25(153), 99106.Google Scholar
LeMasurier, W.E. and Rex, D.C.. 1982. Migration of Cenozoic volcanic activity in Marie Byrd Land. In Craddock, C., ed. Antarctic geosciencc. Symposium on, Antarctic, Geology and, Geophysics Madison, Wisconsin.U.S.A., August 22-27, 1977. Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press, 11561160.Google Scholar
Orombelli, G., Baroni, C. and Denton, G.H.. 1991. Late Cenozoic glacial history of the Terra Nova Bay region, northern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Geogr.Fis. Din. Quat., 13(2), 1990,139163.Google Scholar
Skinner, D.N.B. and Ricker, J.. 1968. The geology of the region between the Mawson and Priestley Glaciers, north Victoria Land, Antarctica. Pan 2.Uppcr Paleozoic to Quaternary geology. N.ʐ. ⁈. Geol. Geophys., 11(4), 10411075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stackebrandt, W.. 1994. Some arguments for Cenozoic fault activities around Gondwana Station, Transantarctic Mountains. In Watercn, F.M. van, der, Verbers, A.L.L.M. and Tessensohn, F., eds. LIRA Workshop Landscape Evolution. A multidisciplinary approach to the relation of Cenozoic climate change and tectonics in the Ross Sea area) Antarctica. Haarlem, Rijks Geologische Dienst, 4952.Google Scholar
Steed, R.H.N. and Drewry, D.J.. 1982. Radio-echo sounding investigations of Wilkes Land, Antarctica. In Craddock, C., ed. Antarctic geoscience. Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press, 969975.Google Scholar
Sugden, D.. 1992. Antarctica ice sheet at risk? Nature, 359(6398), 775776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessensohn, F.. 1994. Structural evolution of the northern end of Transantarctic Mountains. In Wateren, F. vander, M, Verbers, A.L.L.M. and Tessensohn, F., eds. LIRA Workshop Landscape Evolulion.- A multidisciplinary approach to the relation of Cenozoic climate change and tectonics in the Ross Sea area, Antarctica. Haarlem, RijksGeologische Dienst, 5761.Google Scholar
Verbers, A.L.L.M. and Wateren, F. vander, M. 1992. A glacial geological reconnaissance of the southern Prince Albert Mountains,Victoria Land, Antarctica. In Yoshida, Y., Kaminuma, K. and Shiraishi, K., eds Recent progress in Antarctic earth science. Tokyo, TERRAPUB, 715719.Google Scholar
Wateren, F. vanders, M. and Verber, A.L.L.M.. 1992. Cenozoic glacialgeology and mountain uplift in north Victoria Land, Antarctica. In Yoshida, Y., Kaminuma, K. and Shiraishi, K., eds. Recent progress, in Antarctic earth science. Tokyo, TERRAPUB, 707714.Google Scholar
Wateren F.M, van der, Verbers, A.L.L.M. and Tessensohn, F., eds. 1994. LIRA Workshop Landscape Evolution.- A multidisciplinary approach to the relation of Cenozoic climate change and tectonics in the Ross Sea area,Antarctica. Haarlem, Rijks Geologische Dienst.Google Scholar
Wateren F.M, van der. Verbers, A.L.L.M., Höfle, C.H., Smith, C.H. and Luyendyk, B.P. In press. Glaciation and deglaciation of uplified margins of the Cenozoic West Antarctic rift system, Ross Sea, Antarctica. Geol.⁈ahrb.Google Scholar
Webb, P.-N. and Harwood, D.M.. 1991. Late Cenozoic glacial historyof the Ross embayment, Antarctica. Quat. Sci. Rev., 10(2-3), 215223.Google Scholar
Webb, P.-N., Harwood, D.M., McKelvey, H.C., Mercer, J.H. and Stott, L.D.. 1984. Cenozoic marine sedimentation and ice-volumevariation on the East Antarctic craton. Geology, 12(5), 287291.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wörner, G.. 1992. Kirkpatrick lavas, Exposure Hill Formation and Ferrar sills in the Prince Albert Mountains, Victoria Land, Antarctica. Polarforschung, 60(2), 8790.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Research area.MwF, Mawson Fault; MrF, Murray Fault; AP, Ambalada Peak; BD, Burrage Dome; BP, Brimstone Peak; CV, Cirque Valley; GN, Griffin Nunatak; HB, Hughes Bluff; MB, Morris Basin; MN, McLea Nunatak; MtB, Mount Billing; Mt⁈, Mount ⁈oyce; MP, Mount Priestley; RH, Ricker Hills; RN, Richard Nunatak; TN, Trio Nunatak. (Map is based on Carmignani and others (1988) and Skinner and Ricker (1968))Nunataks are in black; flight lines are dotted.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Ice-thickness map

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Subglacial topography map

Figure 3

Fig. 4 West-east cross-section of David Glacier, north of Trio Nunatak; for location see profile A-A' in Figure 1. Bedrock, dotted;ice, white.

Figure 4

Fig 5 Southwest-northeast cross-section of Mount Billing; for location see profile B-B' in Figure l.