Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:10:50.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of the Pension Protection Fund in financial risk management of UK defined benefit pension sector: a multi-period economic capital study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2014

Wei Yang  and
Pradip Tapadar
Wei Yang
Affiliation:
School of Insurance and Collaborative Innovation Center of Financial Security, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China
Pradip Tapadar*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NF, UK
*
*Correspondence to: Pradip Tapadar, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1227 470219; Fax: +44 (0)1227 827932; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the advent of formal regulatory requirements for rigorous risk-based, or economic, capital quantification for the financial risk management of banking and insurance sectors, regulators and policy-makers are turning their attention to the pension sector, the other integral player in the financial markets. In this paper, we analyse the impact of applying economic capital techniques to defined benefit pension schemes in the United Kingdom. We propose two alternative economic capital quantification approaches, first, for individual defined benefit pension schemes on a stand-alone basis and then for the pension sector as a whole by quantifying economic capital of the UK’s Pension Protection Fund, which takes over eligible schemes with deficit, in the event of sponsor insolvency. We find that economic capital requirements for individual schemes are significantly high. However, we show that sharing risks through the Pension Protection Fund reduces the aggregate economic capital requirement of the entire sector.

Keywords

Pension Protection FundDefined benefit pension schemeEconomic capitalSolvencyFinancial risk management
Type
Papers
Information
Annals of Actuarial Science , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 134 - 166
Copyright
© Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, D., Cotter, J. & Dowd, K. (2007). Financial risks and the pension protection fund: can it survive them? Pensions: An International Journal, 12(3), 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boerger, M. (2010). Deterministic shock vs. stochastic value-at-risk – an analysis of the Solvency II standard model approach to longevity risk. Blatter DGVFM 31, 225–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G.D., Epstein, D., Ong, A. & Balevich, I. (2009). A quantitative comparison of stochastic mortality models using data from England and Wales and the United States. North American Actuarial Journal, 13(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaille, J.-P., Clarke, M.G., Harding, J., Hildebrand, C., Mckinlay, I.W., Rice, S.R. & Reynolds, P. (2013). Financial management of the UK Pension Protection Fund. British Actuarial Journal, 18, 345–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2010). Green Paper: Towards Adequate, Sustainable and Safe European Pension Systems. European Commission, Brussels. Available online at the address http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=5551&langId=en.Google Scholar
European Commission (2011). Call for advice from the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) for the review of Directive 2003/41/EC (IORP II). Available online at the address http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/pensions/docs/calls/042011_call_en.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission (2013). Results of the Quantitative Impact Study (QIS) on Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision. Available online at the address http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/pensions/docs/consultations/20130719-eiopa-final-qis_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Hari, N., De Waegenaere, A., Melenberg, B. & Nijman, T.E. (2008). Longevity risk in portfolios of pension annuities. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42, 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (2008). Methodology and assumptions used for CMI Self-Administered Pension Schemes mortality experience analyses. Continuous Mortality Investigation Working Paper No. 34, Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, London. Retrieved 13th November 2014 from http://www.actuaries.org.uk/research-and-resources/pages/continuous-mortality-investigation-working-papers.Google Scholar
Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (2013). The CMI Mortality Projections Model, CMI_2012. Continuous Mortality Investigation Working Paper No. 63, Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, London. Retrieved 13th November 2014 from http://www.actuaries.org.uk/research-and-resources/pages/continuous-mortality-investigation-working-papers.Google Scholar
Lauritzen, S. (1996). Graphical Models. Clarenden Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, D. & Neuberger, A. (2005 a). The Pension Protection Fund. Fiscal Studies, 26(2), 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, D. & Neuberger, A. (2005 b). Pricing pension insurance: the proposed levy structure for the Pension Protection Fund. Fiscal Studies, 26(4), 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, A.J., Frey, R. & Embrechts, P. (2005). Quantitative Risk Management – Concepts, T echniques and Tools. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2011). Population estimates by marital status, mid 2010. Available online at the address http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/pop-estimate/population-estimates-by-marital-status/mid-2010/index.html.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2012 a). Consumer price indices, March 2012. Available online at the address http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_262803.pdf.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2012 b). Annual survey of hours and earnings, 2012 provisional results. Available online at the address http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/ashe/annual-survey-of-hours-and-earnings/2012-provisional-results/stb-ashe-statistical-bulletin-2012.html.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2013 a). Labour market statistics, April 2013. Available online at the address http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_305051.pdf.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2013 b). Pension trends, chapter 6: private pensions, 2013 edition. Available online at the address http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/pensions/pension-trends/chapter-6--private-pensions--2013-edition/art-chp6-2013.html.Google Scholar
Olivieri, A. & Pitacco, E. (2008). Solvency requirements for life annuities: some comparisons, working paper. Retrieved 13th November 2014 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1266094).Google Scholar
The Pension Protection Fund and The Pensions Regulator (2012 a). Annual report and accounts 2011/12. Available online at the address http://www.pensionprotectionfund.org.uk/DocumentLibrary/Documents/ARA_1112.pdf.Google Scholar
The Pension Protection Fund and The Pensions Regulator (2012 b). The Purple Book 2012. The Pension Protection Fund and The Pensions Regulator, Surrey and Brighton. Available online at the address http://www.pensionprotectionfund.org.uk/Pages/ThePurpleBook.aspx.Google Scholar
The Pension Protection Fund and The Pensions Regulator (2012 c). Statement of investment principles. Available online at the address http://www.pensionprotectionfund.org.uk/DocumentLibrary/Documents/SIP_November_2012.pdf.Google Scholar
Porteous, B.T. & Tapadar, P. (2005). Economic Capital and Financial Risk Management for Financial Services Firms and Conglomerates. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Porteous, B.T. & Tapadar, P. (2008 a). The impact of capital structure on financial services firm economic capital and risk adjusted performance. Astin Bulletin, 38(1), 341–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porteous, B.T. & Tapadar, P. (2008 b). Asset allocation to optimise life insurance annuity firm economic capital and risk adjusted performance. Annals of Actuarial Science, 3, 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porteous, B.T., Tapadar, P. & Yang, W. (2012). Economic capital for defined benefit pension schemes: an application to the UK Universities Superannuation Scheme. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 11(4), 471–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Professional Pensions (2010). Top 100 pension schemes 2010. Available online at the address http://www.professionalpensions.com.Google Scholar
SAUL (2012). Scheme funding report of the actuarial valuation as at 31 March 2011. Available online at the address http://www.saul.org.uk/download/10d6aa3baa92be1d0e8057bd30fc794d/actuarial_valuation_2011.pdf.Google Scholar
Stevens, R., Waegenaere, A.D. & Melenberg, B. (2009). Longevity risk and natural hedge potential in portfolios of life insurance products: the effect of investment risk, working paper, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands. Retrieved 13th November 2014 from https://www.actuaries.org/Munich2009/papers/LIFE/Wed_11.15_LIFE_Stevens_Financial_markets_Paper.pdf.Google Scholar
Sweeting, P. (2006). Correlation and the Pension Protection Fund. Fiscal Studies, 27(2), 157–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeting, P. (2008). Stochastic Mortality Made Easy. Pensions Institute. Discussion paper PI-0822. Available online at the address http://www.pensions-institute.org/workingpapers/wp0822.pdfGoogle Scholar
USS (2012). Scheme funding report of the actuarial valuation as at 31 March 2011. Available online at the address http://www.uss.co.uk/HowUssIsRun/publications/Pages/ActuarialValuation.aspx.Google Scholar
Wilkie, A.D. (1995). More on a stochastic asset model for actuarial use. British Actuarial Journal, V, 777–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar