Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:31:49.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Merging Schemes: An Economic Analysis of Defined Benefit Pension Scheme Merger Criteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2011

C. M. S. Sutcliffe
C. M. S. Sutcliffe
Affiliation:
The ICMA Centre, University of Reading, PO Box 242, Reading RG6 6BA, U.K.;, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The conditions under which pension schemes merge is an important issue which has been under-researched. Mergers can affect the strength of the sponsor's covenant and the balance of power between the trustees and the sponsor, as well as the deficit or the surplus of the receiving scheme and its funding ratio. This paper sets out two financial criteria to be met by any pension scheme merger: no profit or loss on merging with another scheme; and no dilution of the funding ratio. After defining a merger basis for valuing the assets and liabilities, and allowing for adjustments to the funding ratio via side receipts and payments; it is shown that, whether or not these criteria are met, depends on the state of the financial markets.

Keywords

Defined BenefitsMergersTakeoversSide PaymentsSide Receipts
Type
Papers
Information
Annals of Actuarial Science , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , September 2006 , pp. 203 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chapman, R.J. & Jagelman, R.J. (1980). Pension aspects of takeovers and mergers. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries Students' Society, 24, 1–32.Google Scholar
Chapman, R.J. & Jagelman, R.J. (1982). Company acquisitions in the U.K.: how important are pensions? Eighth Conference of the International Association of Consulting Actuaries, Stratford-upon-Avon, 2, 20–22.Google Scholar
GN16 (2005). Retirement benefit schemes — transfers without consent. Pensions Guidance Notes, Version 3.1, November, Faculty and Institute of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Greenstreet, I. (2002). Effective management of pension scheme mergers. Journal of Pensions Management, 7(3), 267–285.Google Scholar
Hammond, J.D. (1962). Pension financing in corporate consolidations. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 29(4), 503–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R., Geeson, P., Parlour, C., Cameron, L.A., Appavoo, S. & Love, C. (2005). The market value of pension liabilities: a research report. Punter Southall Transaction Services, October.Google Scholar
The Pensions Regulator (2005). Multi-employer withdrawal arrangements. Guidance from the Pensions Regulator, November.Google Scholar