Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:21:55.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Loss Coverage: Why Insurance Works Better with Some Adverse Selection, Edited by R. Guy Thomas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 274pp, ISBN: 978-1-107-49590-6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2018

Michael Hoy
Michael Hoy*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Annals of Actuarial Science , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , September 2019 , pp. 420 - 425
Copyright
© Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fleurbaey, M. (2010). Assessing risky social situations. Journal of Political Economy, 118(4), 649–680.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. (2018). Welfare economics, risk and uncertainty. Canadian Journal of Economics, 51(1), 5–40.Google Scholar
Gemmo, I., Browne, M.J. & Gründl, H. (2017). Transparency aversion and insurance market equilibria. ICIR Working Paper Series No. 25/17, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
Harrison, G.W. & Ng, J.M. (2016). Evaluating the expected welfare gain from insurance. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1), 91–120.Google Scholar
Hoy, M., Orsi, F., Eisinger, F. & Moatti, J. (2003). The impact of genetic testing on healthcare insurance. Geneva Papers on Risk & Insurance; Issues and Practice, 28(2), 203–221.Google Scholar
Hoy, M. & Lun, E. (2017). Adverse selection and insurance, eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Huang, R.J., Muermann, A. & Tzeng, L.Y. (2016). Hidden regret in insurance markets. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1), 181–216.Google Scholar
Kunreuther, H.C., Pauly, M.V. & McMorrow, S. (2013). Insurance and Behavioral Economics: Improving Decisions in the Most Misunderstood Industry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Macdonald, A.S. & Yu, F. (2011). The impact of genetic information on the insurance industry: conclusions from the “bottom-up” modelling programme. ASTIN Bulletin, 41, 343–376.Google Scholar
McCue, J.M. & Hall, A.M. (2015). Comparing individual health coverage on and off the affordable care act’s insurance coverages. The COMMONWEALTH FUND, 26, 1–8.Google Scholar
Mimra, W. & Wambach, A. (2014). New developments in the theory of adverse selection in competitive insurance. Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 39(2), 136–152.Google Scholar
Rees, R. & Wambach, A. (2008). The microeconomics of insurance. Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics, 4(1–2), 1–163.Google Scholar
Rothschild, M. & Stiglitz, J. (1976). Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4), 630–649.Google Scholar
Salanié, B. (2017). Equilibrium in insurance markets: an empiricist’s view. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 42(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. (1977). A model of insurance with incomplete information. Journal of Economic Theory, 16(2), 167–207.Google Scholar