Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:06:38.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing basis risk in index-based longevity swap transactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2018

Jackie Li*
Affiliation:
Actuarial Studies and Business Analytics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
Johnny Siu-Hang Li
Affiliation:
Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1
Chong It Tan
Affiliation:
Actuarial Studies and Business Analytics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
Leonie Tickle
Affiliation:
Actuarial Studies and Business Analytics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
*
*Correspondence to: Jackie Li, Actuarial Studies and Business Analytics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. Tel: +612 98508576. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In this paper, we carry out an investigation on modelling basis risk and measuring risk reduction in a longevity hedge constructed by index-based longevity swaps. We derive the fitting procedures of the M7-M5 and common age effect+Cohorts models and define the level of longevity risk reduction. Based on a wide range of hedging scenarios of pension plans, we find that the risk reduction levels are often around 50%–80% for a large plan, while the risk reduction estimates are usually smaller than 50% for a small plan. Moreover, index-based hedging looks more effective under a more precise hedging scheme. We also perform a detailed sensitivity analysis on the hedging results. The most important modelling features are the behaviour of simulated future variability, portfolio size, speed of reaching coherence, data size and characteristics, simulation method, and mortality structural changes.

Type
Paper
Copyright
© Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brouhns, N., Denuit, M. & Vermunt, J.K. (2002). A Poisson log-bilinear regression approach to the construction of projected lifetables. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31, 373393.Google Scholar
Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D. & Dowd, K. (2006). A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: theory and calibration. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(4), 687718.Google Scholar
Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D. & Dowd, K. (2008). Modelling and management of mortality risk: a review. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2008(2–3), 79113.Google Scholar
Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G.D., Epstein, D., Ong, A. & Balevich, I. (2009). A quantitative comparison of stochastic mortality models using data from England and Wales and the United States. North American Actuarial Journal, 13(1), 135.Google Scholar
Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G.D. & Khalaf-Allah, M. (2011). Bayesian stochastic mortality modelling for two populations. ASTIN Bulletin, 41(1), 2959.Google Scholar
Carter, L.R. & Lee, R.D. (1992). Modeling and forecasting US sex differentials in mortality. International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 393411.Google Scholar
Comité Européen des Assurances. (2007). Solvency II Glossary. CEA Groupe Consultatif, Brussels.Google Scholar
Coughlan, G.D., Khalaf-Allah, M., Ye, Y., Kumar, S., Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D. & Dowd, K. (2011). Longevity hedging 101: a framework for longevity basis risk analysis and hedge effectiveness. North American Actuarial Journal, 15(2), 150176.Google Scholar
Dowd, K. & Blake, D. (2006). After VaR: the theory, estimation, and insurance applications of quantile-based risk measures. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(2), 193229.Google Scholar
Haberman, S., Kaishev, V., Millossovich, P., Villegas, A., Baxter, S., Gaches, A., Gunnlaugsson, S. & Sison, M. (2014). Longevity basis risk: a methodology for assessing basis risk. Cass Business School and Hymans Robertson LLP, Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) and Life and Longevity Markets Association (LLMA), London, UK.Google Scholar
Human Mortality Database (HMD) (2017). University of California, Berkeley (USA) and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany). Available online at the address www.mortality.org [accessed 6-Apr-2017].Google Scholar
Koissi, M.C., Shapiro, A.F. & Högnäs, G. (2006). Evaluating and extending the Lee-Carter model for mortality forecasting: bootstrap confidence interval. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38, 120.Google Scholar
Lee, R.D. & Carter, L.R. (1992). Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(419), 659671.Google Scholar
Li, J. (2014). A quantitative comparison of simulation strategies for mortality projection. Annals of Actuarial Science, 8(2), 281297.Google Scholar
Li, J. & Haberman, S. (2015). On the effectiveness of natural hedging for insurance companies and pension plans. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 61, 286297.Google Scholar
Li, J.S.H. & Hardy, M.R. (2011). Measuring basis risk in longevity hedges. North American Actuarial Journal, 15(2), 177200.Google Scholar
Li, N. & Lee, R. (2005). Coherent mortality forecasts for a group of populations: an extension of the Lee-Carter method. Demography, 42(3), 575594.Google Scholar
Tsai, J.T., Tzeng, L.Y. & Wang, J.L. (2011). Hedging longevity risk when interest rates are uncertain. North American Actuarial Journal, 15(2), 201211.Google Scholar
Tsay, R.S. (2002). Analysis of Financial Time Series. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Villegas, A.M., Haberman, S., Kaishev, V.K. & Millossovich, P. (2017). A comparative study of two-population models for the assessment of basis risk in longevity hedges. ASTIN Bulletin, 47(3), 631679.Google Scholar
Zhou, R., Li, J.S.H. & Tan, K.S. (2013). Pricing standardized mortality securitizations: a two-population model with transitory jump effects. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 80(3), 733774.Google Scholar