Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:34:51.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An analysis of operational risk events in US and European Banks 2008–2014

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2017

Yifei Li
Affiliation:
Sydney Business School, University of Wollongong, Level 9, 1 Macquarie Place, Sydney 2000, Australia
Neil Allan
Affiliation:
Systems Centre, Bristol University, 4 Bridge Yard, Bradford on Avon, BA15 1NX, UK
John Evans*
Affiliation:
Centre for Analysis of Complex Financial Systems, PO Box 363, Summer Hill, Australia
*
*Correspondence to: John Evans, Centre for Analysis of Complex Financial Systems, PO Box 363, Summer Hill, Australia. Tel: +614 1464 3658. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper explores the characteristics of 2,141 operational risk events amongst European (EU) and US banks over the period 2008–2014. We have analysed the operational risk events using a method originating in biology for the study of interrelatedness of characteristics in a complex adaptive system. The methodology, called cladistics, provides insights into the relationships between characteristics of operational risk events in banks that is not available from the traditional statistical analysis. We have used cladistics to explore if there are consistent patterns of operational risk characteristics across banks in single and different geographic zones. One significant pattern emerged which indicates there are key, stable characteristics across both geographic zones and across banks in each zone. The results identify the characteristics that could then be managed by the banks to reduce operational risk losses. We also have analysed separately the characteristics of operational risk events for “big” banks and extreme events and these results indicate that big banks and small banks have similar key operational risk characteristics, but the characteristics of extreme operational risk events are different to those for the non-extreme events.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anghelache, G.-V., Cozmâncǎ, B.-O. & Radu, A.-N. (2011). Operational risk modelling and capital adequacy – are there any rewards in greater complexity? Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 14, 108131.Google Scholar
Arthur, W.B., et al. (1997). Introduction: Process and Emergence in the Economy. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II. W.B. Arthur, S. Durlauf and D.A. Lane. MA, Addison-Wesley. XXVII: 1–14.Google Scholar
The Banker (2013). Top 1000 World Banks (Ranked by Assets), pp.180–213, The Banker.Google Scholar
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2006). Basel II: International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework – Comprehensive Version. B. f. I. Settlements. Basel, Bank for International Settlements Press & Communications.Google Scholar
Benbya, H. & Mckelvey, B. (2006). Toward a complexity theory of information systems development. Information Technology & People, 19, 1234.Google Scholar
Berg, H. (2013). Transitions of Energy Regimes. Josef Eul Verlag GmbH, Köln.Google Scholar
Camin, J.H. & Sokal, R.R. (1965). A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution, 19, 311326.Google Scholar
Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Dahen, H., Dionne, G. & Zajdenweber, D. (2010). A practical application of extreme value theory to operational risk in banks. The Journal of Operational Risk, 5, 6378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooley, K. (1997). A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 1, 6997.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R. & Raven, P.H. (1964). Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution, 18, pp. 586–608.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. & Herbert, S.I. (2011). Complex adaptive systems (CAS): an overview of key elements, characteristics and application to management theory. Informatics in Primary Care, 19, 3337.Google ScholarPubMed
Embrechts, P., Furrer, H. & Kaufmann, R. (2003). Quantifying regulatory capital for operational risk. Derivatives Use, Trading & Regulation, 9, 217–233.Google Scholar
Farris, J.S. (1983). The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In Platnick, N.I. & Funk, V.A., (Eds.), Advances in Cladistics. Volume 2, Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the Willi Hennig Society (pp. 7–36). Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Goumagias, N., Cabras, I., Fernandes, K.J., Li, F., Nucciarelli, A., COWLING, P., Devlin, S. & Kudenko, D. (2014). A Phylogenetic Classification of the Video-Game Industry’s Business Model Ecosystem. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Gourier, E., Farkas, W. & Abbate, D. (2009). Operational risk quantification using extreme value theory and copulas: from theory to practice. The Journal of Operational Risk, 4, 326.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (2004). Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software. Scribner, New York.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S.A. (1993). The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kurtyka, J. (1999). The science of complexity: a new way to view industry change. Journal of Retail Banking Services, 21, pp.51–58.Google Scholar
Levin, S.A. (1998). Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems, 1, pp. 431–436.Google Scholar
Li, J., Feng, J. & Chen, J. (2009). A piecewise-defined severity distribution-based loss distribution approach to estimate operational risk: evidence from Chinese national commercial banks. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 8, 727747.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Allan, N., Evans, J. (2017). A Nonlinear Analysis of Operational Risk Events in Australian Banks. Journal of Operational Risk, January 2017, DOI: 10.21314/JOP.2017.185.Google Scholar
Mauboussin, M.J. (2002). Revisiting market efficiency: the stock market as a complex adaptive system. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14, 4755.Google Scholar
Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Complex Systems and Evolutionary Perspectives on Organisations: The Application of Complexity Theory to Organisations. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rexová, K., Bastin, Y. & Frynta, D. (2006). Cladistic analysis of Bantu languages: a new tree based on combined lexical and grammatical data. Die Naturwissenschaften, 93, 189194.Google Scholar
Santomero, A.M. (1997). Commercial bank risk management: an analysis of the process. Journal of Financial Services Research, 12, 83.Google Scholar
Shevchenko, P.V. (2010). Implementing loss distribution approach for operational risk. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 26, 277307.Google Scholar
Witt, U. & Schwesinger, G. (2013). Phylogenetic footprints in organizational behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, S33S44.Google Scholar