Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:38:45.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tax-Efficient Pension Choices in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2011

Paul Sweeting
Paul Sweeting
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NZ. :, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The special tax treatment of United Kingdom pensions means that the decision on how to use pension assets is particularly involved. In particular, the ability to take up to 25% of pension assets as a tax-free cash lump sum at retirement, offers retirees opportunities to enhance their pension above that possible through the purchase of a compulsory purchase annuity (“CPA”). The tax-free cash lump sum can be used to buy a tax-efficient purchased life annuity (“PLA”), or in a phased retirement strategy. Income withdrawal can also be used to defer the purchase of an annuity until age 75 and, potentially, to generate a higher income. In this paper I compare the options available to retirees using stochastic modelling. I compare the expected excess pension and expected shortfall, both relative to the alternative risk-free pension available, to assess the various options. I find that if the maximum amount of tax-free cash is available to be used to enhance retirement income, then phased retirement offers the best risk/reward trade off. The advantage is greatest for higher-rate tax payers. As the level of tax-free cash falls, income withdrawal becomes more attractive to those wishing to take greater risks.

Keywords

PensionsCompulsory Purchase AnnuityPurchased Life AnnuityStochastic ModellingIncome TaxIncome DrawdownPhased Retirement
Type
Papers
Information
Annals of Actuarial Science , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , September 2009 , pp. 177 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernheim, B.D. (1991). How strong are bequest motives? Evidence based on estimates for life insurance and annuities. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 899–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D., Cairns, A.J.G. & Dowd, K. (2003). Pensionmetrics 2: stochastic pension plan design during the distribution phase. Insurance Mathematics and Economics, 33, 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugiavini, A. (1993). Uncertainty resolution and the timing of annuity purchases. Journal of Public Economics, 50, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, E. & Tonks, I. (2006). Survey of annuity pricing — Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 318.Google Scholar
Dimson, E., Marsh, P. & Staunton, M. (2002). Triumph of the optimists: 101 years of global investment returns. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimson, E., Marsh, P. & Staunton, M. (2006). Global investment returns yearbook 2006. ABN Amro.Google Scholar
Fama, E. & French, K. (2002). The equity premium. Journal of Finance, 57, 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, A. & Poterba, J.M. (2002). Selection effects in the United Kingdom individual annuities market. Economic Journal, 112, 28–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, A. & Poterba, J.M. (2004). Adverse selection in insurance markets: policyholder evidence from the U.K. annuity market. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, B.M. & Warshawsky, M.J. (1990). The cost of annuities: implications for savings behavior and bequests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HMRC (2006). Insurance policyholder taxation manual.Google Scholar
Khorasanee, M.Z. (1996). Annuity choices for pensioners. Journal of Actuarial Practice, 4, 229–235.Google Scholar
Milevsky, M.A. (1998). Optimal asset allocation towards the end of the life cycle: to annuitize or not to annuitize? Journal of Risk and Insurance, 65, 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milevsky, M.A. (2001). Optimal annuitization policies: analysis of the options. North American Actuarial Journal, 5, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pensions Board (2006). GN9: Funding defined benefits — presentation of actuarial advice, Board for Actuarial Standards.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. (1958). Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. Review of Economic Studies, 67, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, I. (2000). Views of financial economists on the equity premium and on professional controversies. Journal of Business, 73, 501–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaari, M.E. (1965). Uncertain lifetime, life insurance and the theory of the consumer. Review of Economic Studies, 32, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar