Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T13:09:29.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

For an “Ambitious History”: A Reply to Our Critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

David Armitage  and
Jo Guldi
David Armitage
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Jo Guldi
Affiliation:
Brown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article responds to a variety of criticisms of our thesis that the longue durée is returning after a period of retreat, and that this return provides a necessary means to revive the discipline of history as a critical human science. We argue that the longue durée has different meanings in distinct historical traditions and that its importance for non-academic audiences will not be the same as for an academic readership. We also suggest that the longue durée should be combined with other historical time-scales (including those covered by microhistory), and that this combination can help us all to better understand the present in light of the past and then orient ourselves toward the future. In sum, we argue that the revenant longue durée can be one means, among others, to address the widespread “crisis of the humanities” that has been discerned by scholars around the world.

Type
Debating the Longue Durée
Information
Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales - English Edition , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 293 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Les Ȥitions de l’EHESS 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Braudel, Fernand, “History and the Social Sciences: The Longue Durée,” in Braudel, , On History, trans. Matthews, Sarah (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980), 25–54 Google Scholar. Originally published as “Histoire et sciences sociales. La longue durée,” Annales ESC 13, no. 4 (1958): 725–53 Google Scholar.

2. See, for example, Garsonnet, Eugène, Histoire des locations perpétuelles et des baux à longue durée (Paris: L. Larose, 1878)Google Scholar; Lemaitre, Victor, Considérations sur la paralysie générale de longue durée (Paris: A. Parent, 1879)Google Scholar; Imbert, Gaston, Des mouvements de longue durée Kondratieff, 3 vols. (Aix-en-Provence: Pensée universitaire, 1956)Google Scholar.

3. Braudel, “History and the Social Sciences,” 52.

4. Guldi, Jo and Armitage, David, The History Manifesto (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, http://historymanifesto.cambridge.org.

5. Rostow, Walt W., “Histoire et sciences sociales. La longue durée,” Annales ESC 14, no. 4 (1959): 710–18 Google Scholar; Kula, Witold, “Histoire et économie. La longue durée,” Annales ESC 15, no. 2 (1960): 294–313 Google Scholar.

6. For other French responses to The History Manifesto, see Paul Bertrand, “Autour de ‘History Manifesto,’” part 1, “Une affaire de ‘comm,’” part 2, “Caricaturer ou catalyser ?” and part 3, “Les données sont-elles ‘le pain de l’historien’ ?” Médiévizmes, December 15–17, 2014, http://www.medievizmes.org/document637.php, http://www.medievizmes.org/document641.php, and http://www.medievizmes.org/document642.php; Frédéric Clavert, “Jo Guldi, David Armitage, The History Manifesto,” Lectures, December 31, 2014, http://lectures.revues.org/16592; Gabriel Galvez-Behar, “La longue durée, arme de l’historien?” December 8, 2014, http://ggb.ouvaton.org/spip.php?article51; Lemercier, Claire, “La longue durée: une histoire sans histoire ?” and “L’histoire et ses publics: une question d’historiographie ou de modes de diffusion?” Devenir historien, December 1, 2014 Google Scholar, http://devhist.hypotheses.org/2729 and http://devhist.hypotheses.org/2763. For a complete listing of reviews and reactions to The History Manifesto, see http://scholar.harvard.edu/armitage/publications/history-manifesto.

7. Saunier, Pierre-Yves, Transnational History (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8. Lamouroux, Christian, “Chronological Depths and the Longue Durée,” Annales HSS (English Edition) 70, no. 2 (2015): 285–91, here pp. 285–86Google Scholar.

9. Compare Braudel’s, Fernand 1979 work, Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century, trans. Reynolds, Siân (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992)Google Scholar with his 1987 volume A History of Civilizations, trans. Mayne, Richard (New York: Penguin Books, 1995)Google Scholar.

10. Pomeranz, Kenneth, The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Pomeranz, , The Making of a Hinterland: State, Society and Economy in Inland North China, 1853–1937 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993)Google Scholar.

11. China Biographical Database Project, http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/cbdb; Bol, Peter K., “GIS, Prosopography, and History,” Annals of GIS 18, no. 1 (2012): 3–15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12. Lemercier, Claire, “A History Without the Social Sciences?” Annales HSS (English Edition) 70, no. 2 (2015): 271–83, here p. 271Google Scholar.

13. On the broader justification for open-access publication in the humanities and social sciences, see Eve, Martin Paul, Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?bid=CBO9781316161012.

14. Braudel, Fernand, preface to The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, vol. 1, trans. Reynolds, Siân (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), 22 Google Scholar [translation modified].

15. Edelstein, Dan, “Intellectual History and Digital Humanities,” Modern Intellectual History 12, no. 1 (2015)Google Scholar: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1479244314000833.

16. Lemercier, “A History Without the Social Sciences?” 277.

17. “The Proceedings of the Old Bailey, 1674–1913,” http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/.

18. “London Lives, 1690–1800,” http://www.londonlives.org/.

19. Lemercier, Claire and Zalc, Claire, “Le sens de la mesure: nouveaux usages de la quantification,” in À quoi pensent les historiens? Faire de l’histoire au XXIe siècle, ed. Granger, Christophe (Paris: Autrement, 2013), 135–48 Google Scholar.

20. Braudel, preface to The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World, 22.

21. Armitage, David and Guldi, Jo, “The Return of the Longue Durée: An Anglo-American Perspective,” Annales HSS (English Edition) 70, no. 2 (2015): 219–47 Google Scholar, here p. 245.

22. Braudel, “History and the Social Sciences,” 50.

23. For an earlier “crisis,” see Noiriel, Gérard, Sur la “crise” de l’histoire (Paris: Belin, 1996)Google Scholar.

24. Trivellato, Francesca, “A New Battle for History in the Twenty-First Century?” Annales HSS (English Edition) 70, no. 2 (2015): 261–70, here p. 263Google Scholar.

25. Fourcade, Marion, Ollion, Étienne, and Algan, Yann, “The Superiority of Economists,” MaxPo Discussion Paper 14, no 3, November 2014 Google Scholar, http://www.maxpo.eu/pub/maxpo_dp/maxpodp14-3.pdf.

26. Wolfers, Justin, “How Economists Came to Dominate the Conversation,” The Upshot (New York Times), January 23, 2015 Google Scholar, www.nytimes.com/2015/01/24/upshot/how-economists-came-to-dominate-the-conversation.html.

27. Peden, Knox, “What Is to Be Done?” Los Angeles Review of Books, Feburary 18, 2015 Google Scholar, http://lareviewofbooks.org/review/done/.

28. Guldi and Armitage, The History Manifesto, 28–29.

29. Armitage, David, Civil War: A History in Ideas (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2016)Google Scholar.

30. Gruzinski, Serge, L’histoire, pour quoi faire ? (Paris: Fayard, 2015)Google Scholar.

31. Hartog, François, Regimes of History: Presentism and Experiences of Time [2003], trans. Brown, Saskia (New York: Columbia University Press, 2015)Google Scholar.

32. Koselleck, Reinhart, “ Historia Magistra Vitae. Über die Auflösung des Topos im Horizontn euzeitlich bewegter Geschichte,” in Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1979), 38–66 Google Scholar.

33. White, Hayden, “The Burden of History,” History and Theory 5, no. 2 (1966): 111–34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 132.

34. For a thoughtful and practical discussion of the challenges and the opportunities from a British perspective, see Berridge, Virginia, “History Matters? History’s Role in Health Policy Making,” Medical History 52, no. 3 (2008): 311–26 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

35. The Australian historian Stretton, Hugh, quoted in Griffiths, Tom, “History and the Creative Imagination,” History Australia 8, no. 3 (2009): 1–16 Google Scholar, here p. 11.

36. Trivellato, “A New Battle for History,” 270.

37. Guldi and Armitage, The History Manifesto, 117–25.

38. Moatti, Claudia, “ E-Story, or the New Hollywood Myth,” Annales HSS (English Edition) 70, no. 2 (2015): 255–60 Google Scholar, here p. 258.

39. Braudel, preface to The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World, 22.

40. Hunt, Lynn, Writing History in the Global Era (New York: W. W. Norton, 2014)Google Scholar.

41. Hunt, , “Does History Need a Reset?” Annales HSS (English Edition) 70, no. 2 (2015): 249–54, here p. 254Google Scholar.

42. Nowviskie, Bethany, “Digital Humanities in the Anthropocene,” 2014 Google Scholar, http:// nowviskie.org/2014/anthropocene/.