Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:19:59.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Social History

A Latecomer to the Global Turn?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2022

Richard Drayton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why did European history come so late to the global turn? Europe’s past had of course always been constructed relative to its Islamic or Mongol peripheries, and later its colonial offshore. But only recently has it been understood that European and extra-European history are in a dynamic relationship of reciprocal influence. Intellectual and economic history recognized this before social history, which in its post-1960 flowering took it for granted that European social forms were both more advanced and categorically different from others. During the 1970s and 1980s, however, a generation after political decolonization, new work began to explore the impact of peripheries on the European core, and to measure Europe from the outside. After 2000, a globalized European social history became visible. Its evasion of the constraints of the national paradigm has opened up striking new pan- and trans-European historical projects and methods. These are provoking new questions of how we might reconfigure European history in ways which understand eastern and central Europe in their own terms, rather than simply as the retarded extensions of “advanced” western European phenomena.

Résumé

Résumé

Pourquoi l’histoire européenne a-t-elle pris si tard le tournant global ? Si le passé de l’Europe s’est bien sûr toujours construit par rapport à ses périphéries islamiques ou mongoles, et plus tard par rapport à ses colonies, ce n’est que récemment que l’on a compris que l’histoire européenne et extra-européenne s’entremêlent dans une relation dynamique d’influences réciproques. L’histoire intellectuelle et économique l’a reconnu avant l’histoire sociale qui, dans son épanouissement à partir des années 1960, tenait pour acquis que les formes sociales européennes étaient à la fois plus avancées et catégoriquement différentes des autres. Dans les années 1970 et 1980 cependant, une génération après la décolonisation politique, de nouveaux travaux ont commencé à explorer l’influence des périphéries sur le noyau européen et à évaluer l’Europe de l’extérieur. Depuis le début du xxie siècle, on assiste à l’émergence d’une histoire sociale européenne globalisée. En sortant des contraintes du paradigme national, elle ouvre la voie à de nouveaux projets et méthodes historiques pan- et transeuropéens. Ceux-ci suscitent de nouvelles questions sur la façon dont nous pourrions reconfigurer l’histoire européenne de manière à comprendre l’Europe centrale et orientale selon leurs propres termes plutôt que comme de simples extensions retardées de phénomènes européens occidentaux « avancés ».

Type
Research Article
Information
Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales - English Edition , First View , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
© Éditions de l’EHESS 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 John Locke, Drafts for the Essay Concerning Human Understanding, and Other Philosophical Writings, vol. 1, Drafts A and B, ed. Peter H. Nidditch and G. A. J. Rogers (Oxford: Clarenden Press, 1990), 7.

2 Michael Wintroub, A Savage Mirror: Power, Identity, and Knowledge in Early Modern France (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006); Wintroub, The Voyage of Thought: Navigating Knowledge across the Sixteenth-Century World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017); Richard Drayton, Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain, and the “Improvement” of the World (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000); Drayton, “Empire and Knowledge,” in The Oxford History of the British Empire, vol. 2, The Eighteenth Century, ed. P. J. Marshall and Alaine Low (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 231–52; Nicholas Dew, “Vers la ligne: Circulating Measurements around the French Atlantic,” in Science and Empire in the Atlantic World, ed. James Delbourgo and Nicholas Dew (London: Routledge, 2008), 53–72; Miguel de Asúa and Roger French, A New World of Animals: Early Modern Europeans on the Creatures of Iberian America (London: Routledge, 2017); Brian Cowan, The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffee House (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005); Marcy Norton, “The Chicken and the Iegue: Human-Animal Relations and the Columbian Exchange,” American Historical Review 120, no. 1 (2015): 28–60.

3 For an earlier discussion of the importance of the implicit and tacit “global” in the construction of history at the scales of Europe and the nation, see Richard Drayton, “Where Does the World Historian Write From? Objectivity, Moral Conscience and the Past and Present of Imperialism,” Journal of Contemporary History 46, no. 3 (2011): 671–85.

4 Leopold von Ranke, History of the Latin and Teutonic Nations, from 1494 to 1514 [1824], trans. Philip A. Ashworth (London: George Bell and Sons, 1887), 1–19, here p. 19.

5 Percy Ernst Schramm, Hamburg, Deutschland und Die Welt. Leistung und Grenzen hanseatischen Bürgertums in der Zeit zwischen Napoleon I. und Bismarck: ein Kapitel deutscher Geschichte (Munich: Callwey, 1943); Huguette Chaunu and Pierre Chaunu, Séville et l’Atlantique, 1504–1650, 8 vols. (Paris: Armand Colin, 1955–1959).

6 Niall Ferguson, Civilization: The West and the Rest (London: Penguin, 2011); Ricardo Duchesne, The Uniqueness of Western Civilization (Leiden: Brill, 2011). On Ferguson, see Pankaj Mishra, “Watch This Man,” London Review of Books 33, no. 21, November 3, 2011, 10–12. In 2011 Duchesne’s book had the distinction of featuring on a list of “books recommended for White Nationalists” on the neo-Nazi website Stormfront: post by “Knight Ops,” December 8, 2011.

7 Richard Drayton and David Motadel, “The Futures of Global History,” Journal of Global History 13, no. 1 (2018): 1–21, here p. 5.

8 E. P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (New York: Vintage, 1963), 82, 214, 286, and 400. On the later global influence of Thompson’s history from below, see “The Global E. P. Thompson,” special issue, International Review of Social History 61, no. 1 (2016).

9 Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class, 382.

10 Charles Tilly, The Vendée: A Sociological Analysis of the Counter-Revolution of 1793 (London: Edward Arnold, 1964). For this view of the origins of the Haitian Revolution, see Antonio Jesús Pinto Tortosa, Santo Domingo. Una colonia en la encrucijada 1790–1820 (Madrid: Foro para el Estudio de la Historia Militar de España, 2017).

11 L’histoire sociale, sources et méthodes. Colloque de l’École normale supérieure de Saint-Cloud, 15–16 mai 1965 (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1967).

12 Christophe Charle, ed., Histoire sociale, histoire globale ? (Paris: Éd. de la MSH, 1993).

13 Hans-Ulrich Wehler, Bismarck under Imperialismus (Cologne: Kiepenheuer und Witsch, 1969); Wehler, “Sozialimperialismus,” in Imperialismus. Neue Wissenschaftliche Bibliothek, ed. Hans-Ulrich Wehler (Cologne: Kiepenheuer und Witsch, 1970), 86; Wehler, “Bismarck’s Imperialism 1862–1890,” Past & Present 48 (1970): 119–55; Wehler, Das Deutsche Kaiserreich, 1871–1918 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1973); Jürgen Kocka, Klassengesellschaft im Krieg. Deutsche Sozialgeschichte, 1914–1918 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1973).

14 Christopher Hill, The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution (London: Maurice Temple Smith, 1972), 46, 53, 115, 156, 214, 224, and 351. On the neo-Roman use of this concept, see Quentin Skinner, Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

15 Joan W. Scott, “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis,” American Historical Review 91, no. 5 (1986): 1053–75, here p. 1072.

16 Shula Marks, “History, the Nation and Empire: Sniping from the Periphery,” History Workshop Journal 29, no. 1 (1990): 111–19.

17 Florence Deprest, “Fernand Braudel et la géographie ‘algérienne’. Aux sources coloniales de l’histoire immobile de la Méditerranée ?” Matériaux pour l’histoire de notre temps 99, no. 3 (2010): 28–35; John Strachan, “The Colonial Cosmology of Fernand Braudel,” in The French Colonial Mind, vol. 1, Mental Maps of Empire and Colonial Encounters, ed. Martin Thomas (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2011), 72–95.

18 E. P. Thompson, “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism,” Past & Present 38 (1967): 56–97.

19 Robert Brenner, “Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe,” & Present 70 (1976): 30–75; Ellen Meiksins Wood, The Origin of Capitalism (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1999). For a penetrating discussion of Brenner and Meiksins Wood, see J. M. Blaut, Eight Eurocentric Historians (New York: Guilford Press, 2000).

20 See, for example, the oeuvre of David Landes or, more recently, Joel Mokyr, A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016).

21 C. L. R. James, The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution (London: Secker and Warburg, 1938).

22 Eric Williams, Capitalism and Slavery (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1944).

23 For an extension of this argument to include those East Europeans submitted to the “second serfdom” in the slave-capitalist complex, see Richard Drayton, “The Collaboration of Labour: Slaves, Empires and Globalizations in the Atlantic World, c. 1600–1850,” in Globalization in World History, ed. A. G. Hopkins (London: W. W. Norton, 2002), 98–114, here p. 102.

24 For a devastating critique of that resistance, see Cedric J. Robinson, “Capitalism, Slavery and Bourgeois Historiography,” History Workshop Journal 23 (1987): 122–40.

25 Eric Hobsbawm, Industry and Empire: From 1750 to the Present Day (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1968), xii.

26 Alvin Y. So, Social Change and Development: Modernization, Dependency, and World-Systems Theory (Newbury Park: Sage, 1990); J. F. J. Toye and Richard Toye, “The Origins and Interpretation of the Prebisch-Singer Thesis,” History of Political Economy 35, no. 3 (2003): 437–67; Paul Baran, The Political Economy of Growth (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1957).

27 Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World-System, vol. 1, Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Academic Press, 1974); vol. 2, Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750 (New York: Academic Press, 1980); vol. 3, The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy, 1730–1840s (San Diego: Academic Press, 1989); and vol. 4, Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789–1914 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011). For his expression of his debt to Fanon, see Wallerstein, “The Development of an Intellectual Position,” 2000, https://iwallerstein.com/intellectual-itinerary/.

28 Eric R. Wolf, Europe and the People without History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982).

29 For Hill’s guess that the subject deserved research, see The World Turned Upside Down, 255, note 120. First published in 1980, “Radical Pirates?” appears in Hill, Collected Essays, vol. 3, People and Ideas in 17th Century England (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1986), 161–87.

30 John M. Mackenzie, Propaganda and Empire: The Manipulation of British Public Opinion, 1880–1960 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984), and his “Studies in Imperialism” book series; C. A. Bayly, Imperial Meridian: The British Empire and the World, 1780–1830 (London: Routledge 1989); P. J. Cain and A. G Hopkins, British Imperialism, 1688–1990, 2 vols. (London: Longman, 1993).

31 Eugene D. Genovese, The World the Slaveholders Made: Two Essays in Interpretation (New York: Pantheon Books, 1969); Charles van Onselen, “The World the Mineowners Made: Social Themes in the Economic Transformation of the Witwatersrand, 1886–1914,” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 3, no. 2 (1979): 289–302; Richard J. Evans, Death in Hamburg: Society and Politics in the Cholera Years, 1830–1910 (1987; London: Penguin, 2006), 571–72.

32 Robert Brenner, Merchants and Revolution: Commercial Change, Political Conflict, and London’s Overseas Traders, 1550–1653 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).

33 Stuart Hall, “Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance,” in Sociological Theories: Race and Colonialism, ed. UNESCO (Paris: UNESCO, 1980), 305–45; Peter Fryer, Staying Power: The History of Black People in Britain (London: Pluto Press, 1984); David Dabydeen, Hogarth’s Blacks: Images of Blacks in Eighteenth-Century English Art (London: Dangaroo Press, 1985). On Hall’s enormous impact, see John Solomos, “Stuart Hall: Articulations of Race, Class and Identity,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 37, no. 10 (2014): 1667–75.

34 Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in 70s Britain (London: Routledge, 1982); Paul Gilroy, “There Ain’t No Black in the Union Jack”: The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation (London: Unwin Hyman, 1987); Bill Schwarz, “‘The Only White Man in There’: The Re-Racialisation of England, 1956–1968,” Race and Class 38, no. 1 (1996): 65–78.

35 The earliest article in this journal (founded in 1976) to explicitly address race is Jennifer Davis, “From ‘Rookeries’ to ‘Communities’: Race, Poverty and Policing in London, 1850–1985,” History Workshop Journal 27, no. 1 (1989): 66–85.

36 See Kathleen Wilson, ed., A New Imperial History: Culture, Identity and Modernity in Britain and the Empire, 1660–1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004); Catherine Hall, White, Male and Middle-Class: Explorations in Feminism and History (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992); Hall, Civilising Subjects: Metropole and Colony in the English Imagination, 1830–1867 (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002); Antoinette Burton, Burdens of History: British Feminists, Indian Women, and Imperial Culture, 1865–1915 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994); Burton, ed., At the Heart of the Empire: Indians and the Colonial Encounter in Late Victorian Britain (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998); and Burton, After the Imperial Turn: Thinking with and through the Nation (Durham: Duke University Press, 2003).

37 Joseph C. Miller, Way of Death: Merchant Capitalism and the Angolan Slave Trade, 1750–1830 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988); David Hancock, Citizens of the World: London Merchants and the Integration of the British Atlantic Community, 1735–1785 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).

38 Peter Linebaugh and Marcus Rediker, The Many-Headed Hydra: Sailors, Slaves, Commoners, and the Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic (Boston: Beacon Press, 2000).

39 Jürgen Osterhammel, The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014); Victor Lieberman, Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, c. 800–1830, vol. 1, Integration on the Mainland, and vol. 2, Mainland Mirrors: Europe, Japan, China, South Asia, and the Islands (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 and 2010).

40 David Motadel, “Qajar Shahs in Imperial Germany,” Past & Present 213 (2011): 191–235; A. Ricardo López-Pedreros and Barbara Weinstein, eds., The Making of the Middle Class: Toward a Transnational History (Durham: Duke University Press, 2012); Christof Dejung, David Motadel, and Jürgen Osterhammel, eds., The Global Bourgeoisie: The Rise of the Middle Classes in the Age of Empire (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019).

41 Marcel van der Linden, Workers of the World: Essays toward a Global Labor History (Leiden: Brill, 2008), 9. See also Holger Weiss, ed., International Communism and Transnational Solidarity: Radical Networks, Mass Movements and Global Politics, 1919–1939 (Leiden: Brill, 2016); John Donoghue and Evelyn P. Jennings, eds., Building the Atlantic Empires: Unfree Labor and Imperial States in the Political Economy of Capitalism, ca. 1500–1914 (Leiden: Brill, 2015); Fabrice Bensimon, Quentin Deluermoz, and Jeanne Moisand, eds., “Arise Ye Wretched of the Earth”: The First International in a Global Perspective (Leiden: Brill, 2018).

42 Merry E. Wiesner-Hanks, Mapping Gendered Routes and Spaces in the Early Modern World (London: Routledge, 2016); Wiesner-Hanks, ed., Women and Gender in the Early Modern World (London: Routledge, 2015); Joanne Miyang Cho and Douglas T. McGetchin, eds., Gendered Encounters between Germany and Asia: Transnational Perspectives since 1800 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017); Magaly Rodríguez García, Lex Heerma van Voss, and Elise van Nederveen Meerkerk, eds., Selling Sex in the City: A Global History of Prostitution, 1600s–2000s (Leiden: Brill, 2017); Imaobong D. Umoren, Race Women Internationalists: Activist-Intellectuals and Global Freedom Struggles (Oakland: University of California Press, 2018).

43 See Pap N’Diaye, “Pour une histoire des populations noires en France : préalables théoriques,” Le mouvement social 213, no. 4 (2005): 91–108; Wulf D. Hund, Christian Koller, and Moshe Zimmermann, eds., Racisms Made in Germany (Vienna: LIT Verlag, 2011).

44 Sven Beckert, Empire of Cotton: A Global History (New York: Vintage, 2014); Minkah Makalani, In the Cause of Freedom: Radical Black Internationalism from Harlem to London, 1917–1939 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2011); Michael Goebel, Anti-Imperial Metropolis: Interwar Paris and the Seeds of Third World Nationalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).

45 Patricia Purtschert and Harald Fischer-Tiné, eds., Colonial Switzerland: Rethinking Colonialism from the Margins (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).

46 For an example of what is possible from European historians sensitized to global and transnational history, see Christophe Charle, La crise des sociétés impériales. Allemagne, France, Grande-Bretagne (1900–1940). Essai d’histoire sociale comparée (Paris: Éd. du Seuil, 2001); and Christopher M. Clark, The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 (London: Allen Lane, 2012).

47 The reflections in this paragraph I owe to Christophe Charle’s response to an earlier draft of this essay, email of November 8, 2018.