Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:24:58.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short- and long-term effects of high milking frequency during the first 21 days of lactation on production and reproductive performance in high-lactating cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2016

E. Shoshani ,
M. Cohen  and
J. J. Doekes
E. Shoshani*
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
M. Cohen
Affiliation:
Dairy farm, Kibbutz Izrael 19350, Israel
J. J. Doekes
Affiliation:
‘Hachaklait’ Mutual Society for Cattle Insurance & Veterinary Services Ltd, Bareket St. 20, Industrial area, Caesarea 3088900, Israel
*
† Present address: Kfar Hogla, D.N. Hefer 38880, Israel. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We examined short- and long-term effects of high milking frequency (HMF) for the first 21 days of lactation. The study included 122 Israeli Holstein cows – 32 pregnant heifers, 40 cows in second lactation and 50 cows in >second lactation. Heifers were paired according to predicted transmitting ability and cows according to energy-corrected milk (ECM) production, age, days in milk and expected calving date. Thin cows (body condition score <2.75) were not included. One cow from each pair was arbitrarily allocated to a control group milked three times daily (3× milking cows) and the counterpart to an experimental group milked six times daily for the first 21 days of lactation and then three times daily for the rest of the lactation (6× milking cows). During the first 21 days of lactation, 6× milking cows produced 9.3 kg more milk (26.5%) and 7.16 kg more ECM (19%) than the 3× milking cows. The higher milk production persisted throughout the entire lactation (305 days), as reflected by treatment×age interaction showing higher milk production for the first and second (7%) but not >second lactation cows relative to their control counterparts (−0.37%); ECM production was also higher in 6× milking first and second lactation (7.6% and 5%, respectively) but not for >second lactation cows. Furthermore, HMF had long-lasting effects, expressed as significantly higher milk production through the succeeding lactation in the previous first lactation cows (10%); a tendency toward significance in the second lactation cows relative to the controls (4.7%), but a deleterious effect on the >second lactation cows, reflected by lower milk production (−5.25%) than in controls; similar patterns were found for the ECM. For the entire 305 days of lactation, fat and protein yields were higher for first and second lactation cows, whereas protein yield for >second lactation cows was lower in the 6× milking v. control group. Given that HMF during the first 21 days of first or second lactation increases milk and ECM yields throughout the concurrent and successive lactation with no adverse effect on energy balance, mastitis, metabolic diseases or reproduction, it seems to be economically beneficial. However, caution should be paid for >second lactation cows due to absence of significant effect in the entire of the first HMF applied lactation and the deleterious effect in the succeeding lactation.

Keywords

frequent milkingmilk productionfertilitymetabolic status
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 91 - 100
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, DB, DePeters, EJ and Laben, RC 1986. Three times a day milking: effects on milk production, reproductive efficiency, and udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 1441–1446.Google Scholar
Bar-Peled, U, Maltz, E, Bruckental, I, Folman, Y, Kali, Y, Gacitua, H and Lehrer, AR 1995. Relationship between frequent milking or suckling in early lactation and milk production of high producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 2726–2736.Google Scholar
Butler, WR 1998. Review: effect of protein nutrition on ovarian and uterine physiology in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 2533–2539.Google Scholar
Campos, MS, Wilcox, CJ, Head, HH, Webb, DW and Hayen, J 1994. Effects on production of milking three times daily on first lactation Holsteins and Jerseys in Florida. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 770–773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capuco, AV, Wood, DL, Baldwin, R, McLeod, K and Paape, MJ 2001. Mammary cell number, proliferation, and apoptosis during a bovine lactation: relation to milk production and effect of bST. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 2177–2187.Google Scholar
Collier, RJ, Hernandez, LL and Horseman, ND 2012. Serotonin as a homeostatic regulator of lactation. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 43, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahl, GE, Wallace, RL, Shanks, RD and Lueking, D 2004. Hot topic: effects of frequent milking in early lactation on milk yield and udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 882–885.Google Scholar
Erdman, RA and Varner, M 1995. Fixed yield responses to increased milking frequency. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 1199–1203.Google Scholar
Eslamizad, M, Dehghan-Banadaky, M, Rezayazdi, K and Moradi-Shahrbabak, M 2010. Effects of 6 times daily milking during early versus full lactation of Holstein cows on milk production and blood metabolites. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 4054–4061.Google Scholar
Everitt, GC and Phillips, DS 1971. Calf rearing by multiple suckling and the effects on the lactation performance of the cow. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 31, 22–40.Google Scholar
Ferguson, JD, Galligan, T and Thomsen, N 1994. Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2695–2703.Google Scholar
Fernandez, J, Ryan, CM, Galton, DM and Overton, TR 2004. Effects of milking frequency during early lactation on performance and health of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82 (suppl. 1), 424. (Abstract).Google Scholar
Flamenbaum, I, Wolfenson, D, Mamen, M and Berman, A 1986. Cooling dairy cattle by a combination of sprinkling and forced ventilation and its implementation in the shelter system. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 3140–3147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsyth, IA 1996. The insulin-like growth factor and epidermal growth factor families in mammary cell growth in ruminants: action and interaction with hormones. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 1085–1096.Google Scholar
Hale, SA, Capuco, AV and Erdman, RA 2003. Milk yield and mammary growth effects due to increased milking frequency during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2061–2071.Google Scholar
Henderson, AJ and Peaker, M 1984. Feed-back control of milk secretion in the goat by a chemical in milk. The Journal of Physiology 351, 39–45.Google Scholar
Hillerton, JE, Knight, CH, Turvey, A, Wheatley, SD and Wilde, CW 1990. Milk yield and mammary function in dairy cows milked four times daily. Journal of Dairy Research 57, 285–294.Google Scholar
Knight, CH 2001. Overview of prolactin’s role in farm animal lactation. Livestock Production Science 70, 87–93.Google Scholar
Kruip, TAM, Stefanowska, J and Ouweltjes, W 2000. Robot milking and effect on reproduction in dairy cows: a preliminary study. Animal Reproduction Science 60–61, 443–447.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, S 2010. Assessing the association of the level of milk production with reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Journal of Reproduction and Development 56, S1–S7.Google Scholar
Lof, E, Gustafsson, H and Emanuelson, U 2007. Associations between herd characteristics and reproductive efficiency in dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4897–4907.Google Scholar
Lopez-Gatius, F, Garcia-Ispierto, I, Santolaria, P, Yaniz, J, Nogareda, C and Lopez-Bejar, M 2006. Screening for high fertility in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 65, 1678–1689.Google Scholar
Lucy, MC 2001. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1277–1293.Google Scholar
National Research Council 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Nørgaard, J, Sorensen, A, Sorensen, MT, Andersen, JB and Sejrsen, K 2005. Mammary cell turnover and enzyme activity in dairy cows: effects of milking frequency and diet energy density. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 975–982.Google Scholar
Phyn, CVC, Kay, JK, Rius, AG, Morgan, SR, Roach, CS, Grala, TM and Roche, JR 2011. Effect of temporary alterations to milking frequency during the early post-partum period on milk production and body condition score in grazing dairy cows. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 71, 45–49.Google Scholar
Plaut, K, Bauman, DE, Agergaard, N and Akers, RM 1987. Effect of exogenous prolactin administration on lactational performance of dairy cows. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 4, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plaut, K, Cohick, WS, Bauman, DE and Baxter, RC 1991. Evaluation of interference by insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) binding proteins in a radioimmunoassay for IGF-I in serum from dairy cows. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 8, 393–405.Google Scholar
Royal, MD, Darwash, AO, Flint, APE, Webb, R, Woolliams, JA and Lamming, GE 2000. Declining fertility in dairy cattle: changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of fertility. Animal Science 70, 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, AH 2000. The effects of six times a day milking in early lactation on milk yield, milk composition, body condition, and reproduction. MS thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.Google Scholar
SAS Institute 2002. User’s guide: statistical discovery software. Version 5. SAS Institute Incorporation, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Silanikove, N, Merin, U and Leitner, RG 2006. Physiological role of indigenous milk enzymes: an overview of an evolving picture. International Dairy Journal 16, 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soberon, F, Lukas, JL, Van Amburgh, E, Capuco, AV, Galton, DM and Overton, TR 2010. Effects of increased milking frequency on metabolism and mammary cell proliferation in Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 565–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soberon, F, Ryan, CM, Nydam, DV, Galton, DM and Overton, TR 2011. The effects of increased milking frequency during early lactation on milk yield and milk composition on commercial dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4398–4405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stelwagen, K, Phyn, CVC, Davis, SR, Guinard-Flament, J, Pomiès, D, Roche, JR and Kay, JK 2013. Invited review: reduced milking frequency: milk production and management implications. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 3401–3413.Google Scholar
Wall, EH, Crawford, HM, Ellis, SE, Dahl, GE and McFadden, TB 2006. Mammary response to exogenous prolactin or frequent milking during early lactation in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4640–4648.Google Scholar
Wall, EH and McFadden, TB 2007. The milk yield response to frequent milking in early lactation of dairy cows is locally regulated. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 716–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wall, EH and McFadden, TB 2008. Use it or lose it: enhancing milk production efficiency by frequent milking of dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 86, 27–36.Google Scholar
Wilde, CJ, Addey, CVP, Boddy, LM and Peaker, M 1995. Autocrine regulation of milk secretion by a protein in milk. Biochemical Journal 305, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilde, CJ, Henderson, AJ, Knight, CH, Blatchford, DR, Faulkner, A and Vernon, RG 1987. Effects of long-term thrice daily milking on mammary enzyme activity, cell population and milk yield in the goat. Journal of Animal Science 64, 533–539.Google Scholar