Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:19:05.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sheep breeding schemes utilising artificial insemination; large-scale simulation with a complex breeding goal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2010

L. S. Eikje ,
L. R. Schaeffer ,
T. Ådnøy  and
G. Klemetsdal
L. S. Eikje*
Affiliation:
The Norwegian Association of Sheep and Goat Breeders, P.O. Box 104, N-1431 Ås, Norway Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
L. R. Schaeffer
Affiliation:
Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
T. Ådnøy
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
G. Klemetsdal
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Alternative Norwegian sheep breeding schemes were evaluated by stochastic simulation of a breeding population with about 120 000 ewes, considering the gain for an aggregate genotype including nine traits and also the rate of inbreeding. The schemes were: a scheme where both young unproven rams (test rams) and proven rams (elite rams) are used in artificial insemination (AI scheme), a scheme with test rams in natural mating in ram circles and elite rams (from one and a half years of age) in AI across all flocks in the country (NMAI2 scheme), a scheme where, in addition to testing rams, the youngest elite rams (one and a half years of age) are also used in natural mating in ram circles, while older elite rams are used in AI (NMAI1 scheme), and a scheme, acting as a control, where both test and elite rams are used in natural mating (NM scheme). Within the NMAI- and AI-schemes, experimentation was performed for percent ewes inseminated to elite rams v. test rams (EM%), numbers of ewes inseminated per elite ram (EAIn), and numbers of ewes mated per test ram by natural service (TNMn) or by AI (TAIn), respectively. With a restriction on the rate of inbreeding (⩽0.8% per generation), the AI scheme gave similar gain to the NMAI2 scheme (and about 40% more than did the NM scheme). Less gain was generated by the NMAI1 scheme, but it was still considerably more than for the NM scheme (about 25%). In the AI scheme, relatively few ewes (200/300) should be inseminated to each test/elite ram, and a low EM% should be chosen (10%). In the NMAI schemes, TNMn should be relatively high (40 to 50), combined with average and somewhat larger than average EAIn (NMAI2: 700 ewes, NMAI1: 900 ewes), and EM% medium (30%).

Keywords

sheepbreeding schemegenetic gainrate of inbreedingstochastic simulation
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , March 2011 , pp. 367 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bijma, P 2000. Long-term genetic contributions: prediction of rates of inbreeding and genetic gain in selected populations. PhD. thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands. ISBN: 90-5808-241-5.Google Scholar
Eikje, LS, Ådnøy, T, Klemetsdal, G 2008. The Norwegian sheep breeding scheme: description, genetic and phenotypic change. Animal 2, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eikje, LS, Schaeffer, LR, Ådnøy, T, Klemetsdal, G, Ødegård, J 2010. Sampling of estimated breeding values, multi-trait, for use in large scale stochastic simulation. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics (Submitted).Google Scholar
Kennedy, BW, Trus, D 1993. Considerations on genetic connectedness between management units under an animal model. Journal of Animal Science 71, 2341–2352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, RM, Simm, G 2000. Selection strategies in sire referencing schemes in sheep. Livestock Production Science 67, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyngset, O, Lyngset, A 1967. Fruktbarhet hos sau [Fertility in sheep]. Medlemsblad for Den norske veterinærforening 19, 225–233.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, THE 1991. Expectation and variance of genetic gain in open and closed nucleus and progeny testing schemes. Animal Production 53, 133–141.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, THE, Woolliams, JA 1994. Response versus risk in breeding schemes. Proceedings of 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Guelph, Canada 18, 236–243pp.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, THE 1997. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 75, 934–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miraei Ashtiani, SR, James, JW 1991. Efficient use of link rams in Merino sire referencing schemes. Proceedings of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics 9, 388–391.Google Scholar
Miraei Ashtiani, SR, James, JW 1992. Optimum distribution of progeny in sire referencing schemes. Proceedings of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics 10, 476–479.Google Scholar
Nicholas, FW 1989. Incorporation of new reproductive technology in genetic improvement programs. In Evolution and animal breeding (ed. WG Hill and TFC Mackay), pp. 203–209. CAB International, Wallingford, England.Google Scholar
Norsk Sau og Geit [The Norwegian Association of Sheep and Goat Breeders] 2009. Kåringsstatistikk [Statistics from the ram approval system]. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://www.saueavl.nsg.no/karingsstatistikk_vraka_list_2006.cfmGoogle Scholar
Paulenz, H, Soderquist, L, Ådnøy, T, Fossen, OH, Andersen Berg, K 2003. Effect of milk- and TRIS-based extenders on the fertility of sheep inseminated vaginally once or twice with liquid semen. Theriogenology 60, 759–766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulenz, H, Ådnøy, T, Söderquist, L 2007. Comparison of fertility results after vaginal insemination using different thawing procedures and packages for frozen ram semen. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 49, 26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinton, M, Smith, C 1995. Comparison of evaluation-selection systems for maximixing genetic response at the same level of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2208–2212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sales, J, Hill, WG 1976. Effect of sampling errors on efficiency of selection indices. 2. Use of information on associated traits for improvement of a single important trait. Animal Production 23, 1–14.Google Scholar
Skjervold, H, Langholz, HJ 1964. Factors affecting the optimum structure of A.I. breeding in dairy cattle. Zeitschrift für Tierzuchtung & Zuchungsbiologi 80, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C 1983. Effects of changes in economic weights on the efficiency of index selection. Journal of Animal Science 56, 1057–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallin, E 2006. Tilslaget med frossen sæd er på tur oppover igjen [The non-return rate with use of frozen semen is increasing]. Sau og Geit 59, 56–57.Google Scholar
Wallin, E., Boman, IA, Blichfeldt, T 2007. Lammetallet i semin. In Husdyrforsøksmøtet 2007 (ed. LL Dille), pp. 399–402. Institutt for husdyr- og akvakulturvitenskap, UMB, Ås.Google Scholar